Bin Tang1,2, Jin-Guo Zhang3, Hong-Yong Tan1, Xi-Qing Wei1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, China. 2. Department of Medicine, Shandong University Medical College, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, China jgzhang_med@126.com.
Abstract
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is the end-stage of many cardiovascular diseases and severely affects the patients' lifespan. Inhibiting ventricular remodeling is thus a primary treatment target for CHF patients. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) can improve cardiac function and protect myocardial cells. The study aims to investigate the effects of AS-IV on ventricular remodeling and explore its role in regulating energy metabolism using a rat CHF model. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n=20 per group): CHF + benazepril hydrochloride (Benazepril HCL), CHF + low-dose (30 mg.kg-1day-1) AS-IV, CHF + high-dose (60 mg.kg-1day-1) AS-IV, and a sham control group. After 8 weeks of treatment, the cardiac structure and functional parameters were measured. Morphological changes in the myocardial tissue in five groups were evaluated. Protein and mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD), and muscle carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (MCPT1) were also analyzed. Our results showed that the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), collagen volume fraction (CVF), and free fatty acid (FFA) concentration of CHF group rats increased when compared with sham control group, while the protein and mRNA expressions of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 decreased in CHF. Importantly, treatment with AS-IV (CHF + AS-IV group) showed improved heart function and structure, increased expression of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 and improved FFA utilization in comparison with CHF group. In conclusion, our study shows that AS-IV inhibits ventricular remodeling, improves cardiac function, and decreases FFA concentration of CHF model rats. Our findings suggest a therapeutic potential of using AS-IV in CHF.
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is the end-stage of many cardiovascular diseases and severely affects the patients' lifespan. Inhibiting ventricular remodeling is thus a primary treatment target for CHFpatients. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) can improve cardiac function and protect myocardial cells. The study aims to investigate the effects of AS-IV on ventricular remodeling and explore its role in regulating energy metabolism using a ratCHF model. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n=20 per group): CHF + benazepril hydrochloride (Benazepril HCL), CHF + low-dose (30 mg.kg-1day-1) AS-IV, CHF + high-dose (60 mg.kg-1day-1) AS-IV, and a sham control group. After 8 weeks of treatment, the cardiac structure and functional parameters were measured. Morphological changes in the myocardial tissue in five groups were evaluated. Protein and mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD), and muscle carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (MCPT1) were also analyzed. Our results showed that the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), collagen volume fraction (CVF), and free fatty acid (FFA) concentration of CHF group rats increased when compared with sham control group, while the protein and mRNA expressions of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 decreased in CHF. Importantly, treatment with AS-IV (CHF + AS-IV group) showed improved heart function and structure, increased expression of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 and improved FFA utilization in comparison with CHF group. In conclusion, our study shows that AS-IV inhibits ventricular remodeling, improves cardiac function, and decreases FFA concentration of CHF model rats. Our findings suggest a therapeutic potential of using AS-IV in CHF.
Chronic heart failure (CHF), which severely affects the patients’ lifespan and quality of life, is the end-stage of many cardiovascular diseases and is a major public health problem [1-3]. According to epidemiological data, there are more than 5.8 million CHFpatients in America and over 23 million CHFpatients worldwide [4,5]. A 5- and 10-year survival rate of CHFpatients is estimated to be 50 and 10%, respectively, and is even lower in developing countries [6,7]. Ventricular remodeling, including ventricular wall thickening, ventricle dilation, and collagen fiber proliferation, is an important pathological feature of CHF and contributes to ventricular dysfunction, and increase in oxygen consumption, and even cardiac death [8,9]. Inhibiting ventricular remodeling is thus a primary treatment target for CHFpatients and a large number of studies have been carried out to achieve this objective [10].Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) is an extract from the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Astragalus and has many pharmacological functions. AS-IV improves cardiac function, protects myocardial cells, amongst its other cardiovascular protective effects [11]. Many drugs containing AS-IV have been widely used in clinics for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including coronary heart disease and heart failure, but the mechanism of its action remains unclear. Some studies have suggested that the protective effects of AS-IV on cardiac hypertrophy are associated with the regulation of cardiac-related signaling pathways [12-14]. In addition, AS-IV has been shown to reduce the number of apoptotic myocytes in rats [15]. AS-IV protects against ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion injury by initiating energy metabolism [16]. AS-IV also attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction by down-regulating inflammatory signaling in mice [17].In the failing heart, cardiac function impairment is associated with alterations in energy substrate metabolism [18]. It has been previously elucidated that energy substrate of the hypertrophic myocardial cell shifts from free fatty acid (FFA) to glucose due to up- or down-regulation of mRNA and enzymes involved in energy substrate metabolism [19,20]. The key enzymes involved in FFA oxidation are medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) and muscle carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (MCPT-1), and expression of these enzymes is controlled by nuclear factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) [21]. Thus, improving energy metabolism to treat heart failure may be a potential new treatment approach.The present study was designed to examine the effects of AS-IV on CHFrats by assessing cardiac function and structure, hemodynamics and myocardial tissue morphology, and by exploring the mechanisms from an energy metabolism aspect. Considering that Benazepril hydrochloride (Benazepril HCL) is a type of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) usually used to decrease cardiac after-load and inhibit ventricular remodeling [22-24], we incorporated a ‘Benazepril HCL group’ as a standard control group to compare the effect of AS-IV. We hypothesized that the cardiovascular protective effects of AS-IV may be due to the up-regulation of gene and enzyme expression related to FFA metabolism to improve energy metabolism in myocardial cells.
Materials and methods
Antibodies and reagents
AS-IV was purchased from Nanjing Spring and Autumn Biological Engineering (Nanjing, China). Benazepril HCL was purchased from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Beijing, China). Polyclonal antibodies against PPARα, MCAD, glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and MCPT-1, and secondary antibodies were purchased from Boster Biological Engineering (Wuhan, China). Total RNA extraction kit and the cDNA synthesis kit were purchased from TIANGEN Biotechnology (Beijing, China). The primers for PPARα, MCAD, GAPDH, and MCPT-1 were designed and synthesized by Sangon Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The Masson’s trichrome staining kit was purchased from Nanjing SenBeiJia Biological Technology (Nanjing, China). The FFA detection kit was purchased from ShangHai Chaoyan Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The EP50 tube was purchased from BDTar BioTech (Shanghai, China).
Animals and treatment
One-hundred male Sprague–Dawley rats (Experimental Animal Centre, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, China; certificate number: SCXJ20150001) of SPF grade weighing 240 ± 10 g, were housed in a controlled environment (23 ± 2°C, 45 ± 5% humidity, and a 12-h dark/12-h light cycle). The experiments were conducted according to the principles approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University.
CHF model establishment
Rats were divided into five groups (n=20 per group) in accordance with the random number table. The groups included a CHF group, a CHF + Benazepril HCL group, CHF + low-dose AS-IV, CHF+ high-dose groups, and a control sham operation group. CHF was induced by an abdominal aortic constriction (AAC) as described previously after assessing the baseline situation [25]. AAC was established using a 7-0 suture tied around the abdominal aorta in which a 20-gauge needle was inserted. The needle was then retracted yielding a 70% constriction with an outer aortic diameter of approximately 0.9 mm. In the sham operation group, the same surgery was performed as described above except that the aorta was not constricted. All animals had free access to water and a standard rodent chow.
Evaluation of CHF model rats and drug treatment
The results of the model establishment were evaluated by ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) after 6 weeks of the surgery. Serum FFA concentration was measured in all groups. All animals received drug/placebo treatment for 8 consecutive weeks after we confirmed that the CHF model was successfully established. The rats in CHF + low-dose and high-dose AS-IV groups were administered AS-IV through an intragastric gavage at 30 and 60 mg.kg−1.day−1 dissolved in 1 ml of 1% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), respectively. Rats in the CHF + Benazepril HCL group were administered the drug through an intragastric gavage at 10 mg. kg−1.day−1 dissolved in 1 ml CMC. Rats in the sham operation and CHF group were administered CMC at 1 ml/day through an intragastric gavage as a placebo control.
Post-treatment examination of cardiac structure and function
After 8 weeks of treatment, all five groups were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane, and the cardiac structural and functional parameters, including the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), the left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), the left ventricular posterior wall depth (LVPWD), the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), and the isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) were determined noninvasively by echocardiography imaging using a Vevo 2100 high-resolution imaging system equipped with a transducer with center frequencies ranging from 13 to 24 MHz (MS250; Visual Sonics, Toronto, Canada).
Evaluation of cardiac hemodynamic parameters
After conducting echocardiography, all groups underwent left ventricular intubation to confirm cardiac function examination. Rats were anesthetized with 20% urethane (0.5 ml/100 g, i.p.) and fixed on an operation table, and the EP50 tube, connected with a pressure transducer, was inserted into the left ventricle from the right common carotid artery. After connecting the pressure sensor with the physiological signals collection system, the hemodynamic parameters, including the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), the left ventricular end-systolic pressure (LVESP) and the maximal rate of the increase/decrease in the left ventricular pressure (±dp/dt) were monitored.
Detection of serum and myocardium FFA concentration and ventricular remodeling parameters
After left ventricular intubation, rats were killed by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg), and blood samples were collected to detect the FFA concentration. Hearts were removed and the weight of the left ventricle and whole heart were measured with an automatic analytical balance to calculate the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (the ratio of the left ventricular weight to the body weight) and the heart mass index (HMI) (the ratio of the heart weight to the body weight). Part of the left ventricle was homogenized to detect the FFA concentration in the myocardium, and part of left ventricle was preserved in a −80°C freezer for Western blot and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analyses. Remaining left ventricle was fixed in formalin for histological examinations.
Histological examinations
After fixation for 72 h, the myocardial tissue was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin and samples were sliced into pathological sections (4 μm). Pathological sections from the same rat were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and Masson’s trichrome. The H&E stained sections were observed under a light microscope (Olympus Medical Systems Corp, Tokyo, Japan), and the myocyte cross-sectional area of different groups was measured to confirm whether there was a difference amongst five experimental groups in the myocardial morphology. Sections were stained with a Masson’s trichrome kit. We calculated collagen volume fraction (CVF) using image analysis system IPP 6.0, and compared the differences amongst groups.
Western blot analysis
Heart tissue was lysed in RIPA buffer containing a mixture of protease inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, U.S.A.) to extract proteins. The protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Fifty micrograms of protein samples were electrophoresed and separated by SDS/PAGE (10% gel), and transferred to PVDF membranes (Boster, Wuhan, China). After incubating the membranes for 1 h with blocking buffer at 37°C, blots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C for 12 h. Membranes were washed with TBST buffer and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. ECL kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China) and the gel imaging system (Shanghai Furi Co, Shanghai, China) were used for immune complex detection. GAPDH was used as the loading control. The bands were analyzed by densitometry.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from heart tissue using total RNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were determined using optical density measurements at 260 nm on a spectrophotometer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 20 μl reaction mixtures containing SYBR green, RNase-free water, a forward primer, a reverse primer, and cDNA were established to detect the relative mRNA expression of the genes according to the manufacturers’ instruction. Primers used in the study are listed in Table 1. The PCR program was performed at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 60°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min. Melting curves were used to ensure only the correct product was amplified. Fold change difference compared with sham control group was calculated using 2–ΔΔt method. Values were normalized against GAPDH values.
Data are presented as mean ± S.D., and SPSS 13.0 statistical software was used for data processing. Unpaired Student’s t test was used for comparison of sham operation group and CHF model group. Comparisons between different doses of AS-IV and the CHF model group were made using ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons using Dunnett’’s test to evaluate the cardiovascular protective effects of AS-IV, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Mortality of the experimental rats
Two rats died in CHF model group and one rat died in CHF + low-dose AS-IV group. No rats died in CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose AS-IV group. Cause of death may have been associated with heart failure, postoperative infection, or respiratory failure. Prior to AS-IV administration, rats in CHF model group, CHF + low-dose AS-IV group, and CHF + high-dose AS-IV group presented CHF symptoms like tachypnea, loss of appetite, and less activity 3 weeks after the AAC operation. These symptoms were relieved gradually after treatment with AS-IV. The rats in sham operation group did not present CHF symptoms.
Baseline of the five experimental groups rats before the experiment
To ensure comparability, UCG was conducted in all the rats in the five groups, and there was no difference amongst groups (P>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2
The baseline of the five experimental group(s)
Group
n
Weeks old (w)
Body weight (g)
LVEDD (mm)
LVESD (mm)
LVPWD (mm)
LVEF (%)
Benazepril HCL
20
8
249 ± 5.5
5.05 ± 0.66
2.39 ± 0.72
1.02 ± 0.10
80.1 ± 3.29
Sham operation
20
8
243 ± 6.1
5.08 ± 0.70
2.41 ± 0.66
0.99 ± 0.12
81.1 ± 3.55
CHF model
20
8
247 ± 5.8
5.06 ± 0.63
2.43 ± 0.65
1.01 ± 0.15
78.9 ± 4.00
Low-dose
20
8
245 ± 5.9
5.03 ± 0.69
2.38 ± 0.68
1.04 ± 0.16
79.6 ± 4.13
High-dose
20
8
250 ± 5.3
5.09 ± 0.65
2.45 ± 0.71
1.03 ± 0.09
80.8 ± 3.60
LVFS (%)
E (m/s)
A (m/s)
E/A
HR (bpm)
IVRT (ms)
IVRT/HR
FFA (mol/l)
49.10 ± 10.69
0.839 ± 0.07
0.575 ± 0.05
1.459 ± 0.10
331 ± 21
26.31 ± 5.86
0.0795 ± 0.010
322.5 ± 43.1
52.81 ± 9.56
0.855 ± 0.08
0.580 ± 0.06
1.474 ± 0.15
340 ± 26
24.99 ± 5.29
0.0735 ± 0.013
346.7 ± 40.9
50.06 ± 11.51
0.878 ± 0.09
0.583 ± 0.05
1.506 ± 0.12
327 ± 17
25.01 ± 5.51
0.0765 ± 0.015
339.1 ± 45.2
48.09 ± 11.70
0.845 ± 0.06
0.571 ± 0.06
1.480 ± 0.14
339 ± 25
25.95 ± 5.68
0.0766 ± 0.011
350.1 ± 49.2
53.05 ± 12.66
0.871 ± 0.07
0.590 ± 0.04
1.476 ± 0.11
329 ± 19
24.29 ± 5.38
0.0738 ± 0.014
343.5 ± 46.9
Abbreviations: A, mitral valve late diastolic flow propagation velocity; E, mitral valve early diastolic flow propagation velocity; E/A, the ratio of E value to A value; HR, heart rate; IVRT/HR, the ratio of IVRT value to HR value.
Abbreviations: A, mitral valve late diastolic flow propagation velocity; E, mitral valve early diastolic flow propagation velocity; E/A, the ratio of E value to A value; HR, heart rate; IVRT/HR, the ratio of IVRT value to HR value.
Evaluation of the establishment of the CHF model
Six weeks after AAC operation, UCG was performed for all rats to ensure that CHF model was successfully established. Serum FFA concentrations were also measured. Compared with the sham operation group, rats that underwent AAC operation showed an increase in LVEDD, LVESD, LVPWD, and IVRT and a decrease in LVEF and LVFS indicating that CHF model was successfully established (Figure 1A–C,E,F). Moreover, FFA concentration was higher in AAC operated rats than in sham operated rats. (Figure 1D). There was no statistical difference in these parameters amongst the four groups of rats that received the AAC operation. This basically satisfied the experimental animal CHF standard introduced by Bishop [26].
Figure 1
The UCG result of the sham operation rats and the AAC rats (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF+low-dose group)
(A–C) Compared with the sham operation rats, the LVEDD, LVESD, LVPWD, and IVRT of the AAC rats increased, while the LVEF, LVFS, and E/A of the AAC rats decreased. bP<0.05 compared with sham operation rats, cP<0.01 compared with sham operation rats. (D) The serum FFA concentration of the AAC rats increased compared with the sham operation rats. (E,F) Representative M-mode LV echocardiographs and mitral velocity profiles of the five groups of rats.
The UCG result of the sham operation rats and the AAC rats (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF+low-dose group)
(A–C) Compared with the sham operation rats, the LVEDD, LVESD, LVPWD, and IVRT of the AAC rats increased, while the LVEF, LVFS, and E/A of the AAC rats decreased. bP<0.05 compared with sham operation rats, cP<0.01 compared with sham operation rats. (D) The serum FFA concentration of the AAC rats increased compared with the sham operation rats. (E,F) Representative M-mode LV echocardiographs and mitral velocity profiles of the five groups of rats.
Improvement of left ventricular function and structure after AS-IV intervention
To determine the effects of AS-IV on cardiac function and structure, all five groups underwent UCG and left ventricular intubation after different interventions lasting 8 weeks. From the aspect of cardiac function, the AS-IV treated rats showed an improvement in left ventricular function parameters, including an increased LVEF, LVFS, E/A, and ±dp/dtmax and a decreased IVRT. From the aspect of the left ventricular structure, the AS-IV treated rats showed a decrease in LVEDD, LVESD, and LVPWD compared with the CHF group. Hemodynamically, AS-IV-treated rats showed a decrease in LVEDP and LVESP and an increase in ±dp/dtmax compared with CHF model rats which indicated an improvement in left ventricular function after AS-IV treatment (Tables 3 and 4). This result indicates that AS-IV attenuated cardiac remodeling and improves left ventricular function (Figure 2A–C).
Table 3
The UCG result of all of the rats after intervention
Group
n
LVEDD (mm)
LVESD (mm)
LVPWD (mm)
LVEF (%)
LVFS (%)
Benazepril HCL
20
6.15 ± 0.61
3.03 ± 0.70
1.62 ± 0.10
67.8 ± 3.89
40.07 ± 5.23
Sham operation
20
6.01 ± 0.99
2.82 ± 0.61
1.59 ± 0.33
79.2 ± 3.55
49.89 ± 6.98
CHF model
181
6.77 ± 0.702
3.49 ± 0.673
1.99 ± 0.263
52.5 ± 5.623
29.01 ± 5.883
Low-dose
191
6.25 ± 0.604
3.08 ± 0.504
1.79 ± 0.194
57.91 ± 6.554
36.56 ± 4.985
High-dose
20
6.19 ± 0.654
3.02 ± 0.714
1.62 ± 0.395
61.8 ± 4.395
41.29 ± 4.565
E (m/s)
A (m/s)
E/A
HR (bpm)
IVRT (ms)
IVRT/HR
0.659 ± 0.09
0.605 ± 0.07
1.082 ± 0.13
331 ± 26
37.31 ± 5.86
0.1127 ± 0.018
0.839 ± 0.10
0.566 ± 0.09
1.482 ± 0.16
320 ± 30
26.99 ± 6.06
0.0843 ± 0.015
0.540 ± 0.063
0.697 ± 0.053
0.775 ± 0.143
397 ± 193
51.01 ± 7.013
0.1284 ± 0.0173
0.597 ± 0.074
0.595 ± 0.045
1.003 ± 0.105
379 ± 264
45.95 ± 4.684
0.1212 ± 0.010
0.671 ± 0.115
0.583 ± 0.085
1.151 ± 0.125
368 ± 195
33.29 ± 5.385
0.0994 ± 0.0155
Abbreviations: A, mitral valve late diastolic flow propagation velocity; E, mitral valve early diastolic flow propagation velocity; E/A, the ratio of E value to A value; HR, heart rate; IVRT/HR, the ratio of IVRT value to HR value.
1Two rats died in the CHF model group, and one rat died in the CHF + low-dose AS-IV group. The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D.
2P<0.05.
3P<0.01 compared with the sham operation.
4P<0.05.
5P<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Table 4
The hemodynamic parameters examined by left ventricular intubation in all the rats after intervention
Group
n
Body weight (g)
LVEDP (mmHg)
LVESP (mmHg)
+dp/dt max (mmHg/s)
−dp/dt max (mmHg/s)
Benazepril HCL
20
370.1 ± 36.9
16.21 ± 1.95
145.21 ± 4.41
5055 ± 389
5019 ± 489
Sham operation
20
386.5 ± 40.1
5.23 ± 0.82
129.63 ± 4.33
6010 ± 367
6401 ± 609
CHF model
181
360.0 ± 25.3
36.25 ± 1.452
169.86 ± 6.692
4668 ± 3592
4023 ± 6542
Low-dose
191
375.2 ± 20.1
18.12 ± 1.653
146.15 ± 5.233
4956 ± 4543
4401 ± 4213
High-dose
20
379.2 ± 30.5
8.82 ± 1.623
120.53 ± 6.013
5339 ± 4013
4989 ± 4553
The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D. Abbreviations: +dp/dtmax, LV maximal first derivative of pressure rising over time; –dp/dtmax, LV maximal first derivative of pressure dropping over time.
1Two rats died in the CHF model group, and one rat died in the CHF + low-dose AS-IV group.
2P<0.01 compared with the sham operation.
3P<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Figure 2
The results after AS-IV intervention.
Representative M-mode LV echocardiographs (A), mitral velocity profiles (B), and left ventricular pressure waveform (C) of the five experimental groups after intervention (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group).
The results after AS-IV intervention.
Representative M-mode LV echocardiographs (A), mitral velocity profiles (B), and left ventricular pressure waveform (C) of the five experimental groups after intervention (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group).Abbreviations: A, mitral valve late diastolic flow propagation velocity; E, mitral valve early diastolic flow propagation velocity; E/A, the ratio of E value to A value; HR, heart rate; IVRT/HR, the ratio of IVRT value to HR value.1Two rats died in the CHF model group, and one rat died in the CHF + low-dose AS-IV group. The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D.2P<0.05.3P<0.01 compared with the sham operation.4P<0.05.5P<0.01 compared with the CHF model.The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D. Abbreviations: +dp/dtmax, LV maximal first derivative of pressure rising over time; –dp/dtmax, LV maximal first derivative of pressure dropping over time.1Two rats died in the CHF model group, and one rat died in the CHF + low-dose AS-IV group.2P<0.01 compared with the sham operation.3P<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Gross morphology and LVMI and HMI
Rats in all groups were killed painlessly after left ventricular intubation and whole hearts were taken to measure the size and weight of left ventricle and whole heart. Compared with hearts from the sham operation group, cardiac volume of CHF model group was grossly enlarged, and weight of the left ventricle and whole heart also increased (P<0.01), which was proven by LVMI and HMI (Figure 3). Compared with hearts from CHF model group, the cardiac volume of CHF + low-dose and CHF + high-dose AS-IV group rats were grossly narrow, and the weight of left ventricle and whole heart was also decreased (P<0.05/0.01) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
LVMI and HMI and Grossmorphology.
The results of the LVMI (A) and HMI (B) measurement after different interventions (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group, and n=19 for CHF + low-dose group). Representative gross morphology of the whole hearts (C) and the corresponding transverse cross-sections at the mid-ventricle level (D). cP<0.01 comapred with the sham operation, eP<0.05 compared with the CHF model, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
LVMI and HMI and Grossmorphology.
The results of the LVMI (A) and HMI (B) measurement after different interventions (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group, and n=19 for CHF + low-dose group). Representative gross morphology of the whole hearts (C) and the corresponding transverse cross-sections at the mid-ventricle level (D). cP<0.01 comapred with the sham operation, eP<0.05 compared with the CHF model, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Serum and myocardium FFA concentrations
To investigate the effect of AS-IV on FFA metabolism of CHFrats, we determined the serum and myocardium FFA concentrations. The results showed significantly higher levels of serum and myocardium FFA in CHF model group when compared with the sham operation rats (P<0.01). In contrast, the serum and myocardium FFA concentration was reduced in AS-IV-treated rats in comparison with CHF model rats (P<0.01) (Figure 4). These results indicate that AS-IV improved FFA utilization in CHFrats.
Figure 4
The serum and myocardium FFA concentration.
Serum FFA concentration (A) and myocardium FFA concentration (B) of the five experimental groups. The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D. (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group); cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation, eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
The serum and myocardium FFA concentration.
Serum FFA concentration (A) and myocardium FFA concentration (B) of the five experimental groups. The quantitative data are shown as the means ± S.D. (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group); cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation, eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Histological examination
To determine the histological changes induced by different interventions, we stained the pathological sections using two methods, H&E staining to observe the myocardial cell morphology, and Masson’s trichrome staining to determine the volume of the collagen fibers, which were stained blue (Figure 5A,B).
Figure 5
Representative staining sections of the five experimental groups after the interventions (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group)
The sections were visualized at 200× magnification. (A) The sections were stained with H&E. (B) The sections were stained using Masson’s trichrome. Red indicates the muscle fibers and blue indicates collagen. (C) Myocyte cross-sectional area date. (D) CVF of the quantitative data. cP <0.01 compared with the sham operation, eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Representative staining sections of the five experimental groups after the interventions (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group)
The sections were visualized at 200× magnification. (A) The sections were stained with H&E. (B) The sections were stained using Masson’s trichrome. Red indicates the muscle fibers and blue indicates collagen. (C) Myocyte cross-sectional area date. (D) CVF of the quantitative data. cP <0.01 compared with the sham operation, eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.Compared with the sections in sham operation group, the sections of CHF model group exhibited hypertrophy of the myocardial cells, disorders of cardiomyocyte arrangement, proliferation of collagen fibers, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Treatment with AS-IV reversed these effects in CHF + low-dose and the CHF + high-dose AS-IV group (Figure 5A). The cross-sectional area of myocytes in CHF model rats was higher than that in sham operation rats and AS-IV-treatment reduced this parameter (Figure 5C). Compared with the sections of sham operation group, the CVF of CHF model group sections increased significantly as shown by the Masson’s trichrome staining (P<0.01). The CVF of CHF + low-dose and CHF + high-dose AS-IV group sections decreased significantly when compared with CHF group (P<0.05/0.01) (Figure 5B,D).
Western blot examination
To investigate the impact of AS-IV on FFA metabolism of myocardial cells, we analyzed the expression of key enzymes involved in FFA metabolism (Figure 6A). Compared with the sham operation group, the protein expression of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 in CHF model group was significantly decreased (P<0.01). Importantly, these effects were reversed in CHF + low-dose and the CHF + high-dose AS-IV group rats (P<0.05/0.01) (Figure 6B).
Figure 6
Expression analysis of key enzymes involved in FFA metabolism.
Representative blots of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 (A) and the intensity normalized against GAPDH (B) in the LV myocardium of the five groups (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group). The quantitative data are given as the means ± S.D. cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation; eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.
Expression analysis of key enzymes involved in FFA metabolism.
Representative blots of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 (A) and the intensity normalized against GAPDH (B) in the LV myocardium of the five groups (n=20 for the CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group). The quantitative data are given as the means ± S.D. cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation; eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model.We also analyzed the mRNA levels of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 and found that gene expression of these proteins was significantly decreased in CHF model group when compared with the sham operation group (P<0.01). Treatment with AS-IV (in CHF + low-dose and CHF + high-dose AS-IV groups) overcame the inhibitory effects of CHF (Figure 7). The high AS-IV dose almost rescued PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 expression to the control level (P>0.05), while it was only partially rescued in the low-dose group (P<0.05 compared with sham control group). These results were consistent with the Western blot data.
Figure 7
Relative quantitation of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 mRNA by RT-qPCR in the myocardia of the five groups of rats (n=20 for CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group)
The quantitative data are given as the means ± S.D. cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation; eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model. Please note that compared with the sham operation group, CHF + low-dose group was still statistically significant (P<0.05); however, the difference in the CHF + high-dose group compared with the sham control group was not significant (P>0.05).
Relative quantitation of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 mRNA by RT-qPCR in the myocardia of the five groups of rats (n=20 for CHF + Benazepril HCL group, the sham operation group, and the CHF + high-dose group, n=18 for the CHF model group and n=19 for the CHF + low-dose group)
The quantitative data are given as the means ± S.D. cP<0.01 compared with the sham operation; eP<0.05, fP<0.01 compared with the CHF model. Please note that compared with the sham operation group, CHF + low-dose group was still statistically significant (P<0.05); however, the difference in the CHF + high-dose group compared with the sham control group was not significant (P>0.05).
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrated the cardiovascular protective effect of AS-IV on CHFrats in by measuring four outcomes. Structurally, we proved that AS-IV inhibits ventricular hypertrophy. Functionally, we demonstrated that AS-IV improves left ventricular function. In addition, by gross morphology, we confirmed that AS-IV inhibits ventricular remodeling, proliferation of collagen fibers, and hypertrophy of myocardial cells. The preventive effects of AS-IV on CHF have been proven in many similar studies. Our results are consistent with other studies. Zhang et al. [12] reported that AS-IV protected against cardiac hypertrophy by reducing left intraventricular pressure of rats induced by isoproterenol. In another study, Zhang et al. [27] found that AS-IV improved post-ischemic heart function and ameliorated reperfusion arrhythmias in rat hearts in vitro. AS-IV was also found to improve ventricular remodeling in myocardial infarction (MI) and pressure overload (transverse aortic constriction) mouse models [28]. Zhao et al. [17] found that AS-IV attenuated LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction and improved cardiac LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume and the LV end-systolic volume. Zhao et al. [15] reported that AS-IV improved the cardiac functions of congestive heart failurerats induced by ligation of the left coronary artery.The energy substrates of the heart mainly include FFA and glucose, but in the failing heart, the energy substrates shift from FFA to glucose [29,30]. This is due to the down-regulation of key enzymes in FFA metabolism [31-33]. The key enzymes regulating FFA metabolism include MCPT1 and MCAD, both of which are controlled by the nuclear factor PPARα [34]. MCPT1 is responsible for conversion into fatty acyl carnitine and its uptake by the mitochondria [35]. MCAD regulates the first step in the reaction of fatty acid β-oxidation, namely conversion of acyl-coenzyme A into trans-enoyl-CoA [36]. The synthesis of MCPT1 and MCAD is regulated by nuclear factor PPARα the activation of which promotes the expression of downstream genes, namely, the MCPT1 and MCAD [37].Next, we investigated whether the use of AS-IV will affect the energy substrates of the heart in CHFrats. First, we examined the serum and myocardium FFA concentrations of the different experimental groups. The result showed that the serum FFA concentration of the CHFrats increased obviously compared with the sham operation rats, while the serum and myocardium FFA concentrations in the CHF + AS-IV-treated rats were reduced compared with the CHF model group rats. The consequence is consistent with many other studies, which show that, in the failing heart, the fatty acid concentration often increases [38,39]. Then, we found that the protein of PPARα, MCPT1, and MCAD was increased by Western blot analysis after treatment with AS-IV in contrast with the CHF model rats. This result indicated that AS-IV improves the FFA utilization of the myocardial cell. To confirm this indication, we further detected the mRNA levels of PPARα, MCPT1, and MCAD by RT-qPCR. The data showed that the mRNA levels of PPARα, MCPT1, and MCAD also increased in the CHF + AS-IV-treated rats compared with the CHF model rats. These data are consistent with the Western blot result AVE8134, a PPARα agonist, attenuates the progression of heart failure and increases survival in rats [40]. Fenofibrate, another PPARα agonist, regresses left ventricular hypertrophy and increases the myocardium PPARα expression in spontaneously hypertensiverats [41]. Fenofibrate also inhibits the left ventricle fibrosis of pressure-overload rats induced by abdominal aortic banding [42]. Based on these reports, we rationalized that the activation of PPARα may attenuate the progression of heart failure. In our study, we found that AS-IV inhibited ventricular remodeling, improved the cardiac function, and caused FFA utilization in CHFrats. Our findings suggest that the protective effects of AS-IV on cardiac structure and function are correlated with the activation of PPARα. One potential limitation of the current study is that we have not elucidated the detailed underlying mechanisms by which low- or high-dose of AS-IV causes metabolic reprogramming and how it rescues expression of PPARα, MCAD, and MCPT1 leading to improved FFA utilization. Another limitation of our study is that we did not study the effect of AS-IV on glucose metabolism in CHF model rats. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between improved lipid utilization and the cardiac function caused by AS-IV.In summary, our study shows that AS-IV inhibits ventricular remodeling, improves cardiac function, and decreases FFA concentration of CHF model rats. Our findings suggest a therapeutic potential of using AS-IV in CHF.
Authors: Vanessa Xanthakis; Danielle M Enserro; Martin G Larson; Kai C Wollert; James L Januzzi; Daniel Levy; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Susan Cheng; Thomas J Wang; Gary F Mitchell; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Lisa de las Fuentes; Pablo F Soto; Brian P Cupps; Michael K Pasque; Pilar Herrero; Robert J Gropler; Alan D Waggoner; Victor G Dávila-Román Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Bijoy K Kundu; Min Zhong; Shiraj Sen; Giovanni Davogustto; Susanna R Keller; Heinrich Taegtmeyer Journal: Cardiology Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 1.869
Authors: Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Richard Franklin; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jixiang Ma; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321