Literature DB >> 29301644

Sex-Specific Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3 Valve: Insights From the PARTNER II S3 High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Cohorts.

Molly Szerlip1, Sarah Gualano2, Elizabeth Holper2, John J Squiers2, Jonathon M White3, Darshan Doshi4, Mathew R Williams5, Rebecca T Hahn4, John G Webb6, Lars G Svensson3, Ajay J Kirtane4, David J Cohen7, Pamela S Douglas8, Maria C Alu4, Aaron Crowley9, E Murat Tuzcu3, Raj R Makkar10, Howard C Herrmann11, Vasilis Babaliaros12, Vinod H Thourani12, Martin B Leon4, Susheel K Kodali4, Michael J Mack2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify sex-specific outcomes of intermediate risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 valve.
BACKGROUND: A survival difference has been observed in women as compared with men in inoperable and high-risk patients receiving early-generation balloon-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Whether a sex-specific outcome difference persists with newer-generation valves and in lower-risk patients is unknown.
METHODS: The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) II S3 trial included high-risk (HR) (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score >8% or heart team determination) and intermediate-risk (IR) (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 4% to 8% or heart team determination) patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who were treated with TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared by sex.
RESULTS: Between October 2013 and December 2014, 1,661 patients were enrolled: 583 were HR (338 men, 245 women) and 1,078 were IR (666 men, 412 women). In both cohorts, women were more likely than men to be frail (22% vs. 13%; p < 0.001), but less likely to have comorbid conditions of renal insufficiency, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Women were more likely to receive ≤23-mm valves (74.1% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive 29-mm valves (1.4% vs. 35.1%; p < 0.001). In the combined cohorts, there was no difference in mortality for women compared with men at 30 days (2.0% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.20) or 1 year (9.3% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.59). There were no differences in disabling stroke or any stroke at 30 days or 1 year; however, women had an increased rate of minor stroke at 30 days (2.1% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01). Female sex was associated with increased major vascular complications (7.9% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.003), but not with moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation. Notably, similar outcomes regarding sex-specific outcomes were obtained within stratified analyses of the HR and IR cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found no apparent sex-specific differences in survival or stroke in this trial of TAVR. This may reflect the changing demographic of patients enrolled, use of newer-generation valves with more sizes available, and more accurate valve sizing techniques.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVR; aortic stenosis; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29301644     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  6 in total

Review 1.  Vascular Access-Related Complications in Women: Temporal Trends, Emerging Data, and the Current State of Interventional Cardiology Practice.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Rushi V Parikh; Jennifer A Tremmel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: What Really Matters for Women?

Authors:  R David Fish
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 3.  Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Sheila L Klassen; Evin Yucel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 4.  Sex Differences and Similarities in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline T DesJardin; Joanna Chikwe; Rebecca T Hahn; Judy W Hung; Francesca N Delling
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in women.

Authors:  Dipti Itchhaporia
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis across Europe.

Authors:  Richard Paul Steeds; David Messika-Zeitoun; Jeetendra Thambyrajah; Antonio Serra; Eberhard Schulz; Jiri Maly; Marco Aiello; Tanja K Rudolph; Guy Lloyd; Alessandro Santo Bortone; Alberto Clerici; Georg Delle-Karth; Johannes Rieber; Ciro Indolfi; Massimo Mancone; Loic Belle; Alexander Lauten; Martin Arnold; Berto J Bouma; Matthias Lutz; Cornelia Deutsch; Jana Kurucova; Martin Thoenes; Peter Bramlage; Norbert Frey
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.