Literature DB >> 29301626

Temporal Trends of De Novo Malignancy Development After Heart Transplantation.

Jong-Chan Youn1, Josef Stehlik2, Amber R Wilk3, Wida Cherikh3, In-Cheol Kim4, Gyeong-Hun Park5, Lars H Lund6, Howard J Eisen7, Do Young Kim8, Sun Ki Lee8, Suk-Won Choi8, Seongwoo Han8, Kyu-Hyung Ryu8, Seok-Min Kang9, Jon A Kobashigawa10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignancy is a concern in cardiac transplant recipients, but the temporal trends of de novo malignancy development are unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the temporal trends of the incidence, types, and predictors of de novo malignancy in cardiac transplant recipients.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the temporal trends of post-transplant incidence, types, and predictors of malignancy using 17,587 primary adult heart-only transplant recipients from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry. The main study outcomes included the incidence of, types of, and time to de novo malignancy.
RESULTS: The risk of any de novo solid malignancy between years 1 and 5 after transplantation was 10.7%. The cumulative incidence by malignancy type was: skin cancer (7.0%), non-skin solid cancer (4.0%), and lymphoproliferative disorders (0.9%). There was no temporal difference in the time to development according to malignancy type. However, the cumulative incidence of de novo solid malignancy increased from 2000 to 2005 vs. 2006 to 2011 (10.0% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Survival in patients after de novo malignancy was markedly lower than in patients without malignancy (p < 0.0001). Older recipients and patients who underwent transplantation in the recent era had a higher risk of de novo malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 10% of adult heart transplant recipients developed de novo malignancy between years 1 and 5 after transplantation, and this outcome was associated with increased mortality. The incidence of post-transplant de novo solid malignancy increased temporally, with the largest increase in skin cancer. Individualized immunosuppression strategies and enhanced cancer screening should be studied to determine whether they can reduce the adverse outcomes of post-transplantation malignancy.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart transplantation; immunosuppression; malignancy; prognosis; temporal trends

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29301626     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  17 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults.

Authors:  Sai Bhagra; Jayan Parameshwar
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-15

2.  Incidence of Neoplasia in Pigs and Its Relevance to Clinical Organ Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Jagdale; Hayato Iwase; Edwin C Klein; David Kc Cooper
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Immunosuppression and Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Nilay Sutaria; Lynne Sylvia; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Heart Transplant Immunosuppression Strategies at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Authors:  David H Chang; Jong-Chan Youn; Deanna Dilibero; Jignesh K Patel; Jon A Kobashigawa
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Editorial: Cardiovascular service innovation, intersectionality, and the challenges of COVID-19.

Authors:  James M Beattie
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.302

6.  Influence of renal insufficiency pre-heart transplantation on malignancy risk post-heart transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan Roest; Christianne Struijk; Alina A Constantinescu; Kadir Caliskan; Elsemieke I Plasmeijer; Eric Boersma; Jasper J Brugts; Olivier C Manintveld
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-28

7.  Risk prediction model for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in adult cardiac allograft recipients.

Authors:  Nandini Nair; Zhiyong Hu; Dongping Du; Enrique Gongora
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Mesenchymal stem cells transfected with anti-miRNA-204-3p inhibit acute rejection after heart transplantation by targeting C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) in vitro.

Authors:  Lei Tuo; Hao Song; Detian Jiang; Xiao Bai; Guangmin Song
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Current Status of Malignant Tumors after Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Bairu Shen; Zhuofei Cen; Minghua Tan; Changshan Song; Xuhui Wu; Jiaqing Wang; Minqian Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  The Past, Present and Future of Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  In Cheol Kim; Jong Chan Youn; Jon A Kobashigawa
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.