| Literature DB >> 29301175 |
Chang Hyun Oh1, Seung Hwan Yoon2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pfirrmann disc grade is a useful scoring tool for evaluating disc degeneration, but normal values according to aging process has not been elucidated. This study was conducted to identify the prevalence and pattern of whole spine disc degeneration according to ages and gender differences.Entities:
Keywords: Age; Decades; Disc degeneration; Pfirrmann disc grades; Spine
Year: 2017 PMID: 29301175 PMCID: PMC5769942 DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2017.14.4.148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Spine ISSN: 1738-2262
Fig. 1Whole spine sagittal T2-weighted image was analyzed to check the Pfirrmann disc grade.
The classification of Pfirrmann disc degeneration grade
| Grade | Structure | Distinction of nucleus and anulus | Signal intensity | Height of Intervertebral disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homogeneous, bright white | Clear | Hyperintense, isointense to cerebrospinal fluid | Normal |
| 2 | Inhomogeneous with or without horizontal bands | Clear | Hyperintense, isointense to cerebrospinal fluid | Normal |
| 3 | Inhomogeneous, gray | Unclear | Intermediate | Normal to slightly decreased |
| 4 | Inhomogeneous, gray to black | Lost | Intermediate to hypointense | Normal to moderately decreased |
| 5 | Inhomogeneous, black | Lost | Hypointense | Collapsed |
Grade 1, normal shape, no horizontal bands, clear distinction of nucleus and annulus; grade 2, nonhomogeneous shape with horizontal bands, some blurring between nucleus and annulus; grade 3, nonhomogeneous shape with blurring between nucleus and annulus, annulus shape still recognizable; grade 4, nonhomogeneous shape with hypointensity, annulus shape not intact and distinction between nucleus and annulus impossible, disc height usually decreased; grade 5, same as grade 4 but with collapsed disc space.
All Pfirrmann grades of disc degeneration at each disc levels
| Level | Grade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| C2–3 | 6 (0.9) | 54 (8.3) | 318 (48.7) | 269 (41.2) | 6 (0.9) |
| C3–4 | 1 (0.2) | 49 (7.5) | 317 (48.5) | 279 (42.7) | 7 (1.1) |
| C4–5 | 3 (0.5) | 60 (9.2) | 312 (47.8) | 265 (40.6) | 13 (2.0) |
| C5–6 | 2 (0.3) | 45 (6.9) | 270 (41.3) | 275 (42.1) | 61 (9.3) |
| C6–7 | 3 (0.5) | 93 (14.2) | 262 (40.1) | 259 (39.7) | 36 (5.5) |
| C7–T1 | 6 (0.9) | 167 (25.6) | 303 (46.4) | 170 (26.0) | 7 (1.1) |
| T1–2 | 2 (0.3) | 148 (22.7) | 346 (53.0) | 150 (23.0) | 7 (1.1) |
| T2–3 | 1 (0.2) | 144 (22.1) | 344 (52.7) | 161 (24.7) | 3 (0.5) |
| T3–4 | 1 (0.2) | 126 (19.3) | 340 (52.1) | 179 (27.4) | 7 (1.1) |
| T4–5 | 1 (0.2) | 128 (19.6) | 319 (48.9) | 193 (29.6) | 12 (1.8) |
| T5–6 | 1 (0.2) | 125 (19.1) | 315 (48.2) | 201 (30.8) | 11 (1.7) |
| T6–7 | 0 (0) | 139 (21.3) | 315 (48.2) | 192 (29.4) | 7 (1.1) |
| T7–8 | 0 (0) | 139 (21.3) | 344 (52.7) | 161 (24.7) | 3 (0.5) |
| T8–9 | 1 (0.2) | 155 (23.7) | 354 (54.2) | 137 (21.0) | 5 (0.8) |
| T9–10 | 1 (0.2) | 170 (26.0) | 359 (55.0) | 120 (18.4) | 7 (1.1) |
| T10–11 | 2 (0.3) | 184 (28.2) | 359 (55.0) | 101 (15.5) | 3 (0.5) |
| T11–12 | 2 (0.3) | 216 (33.1) | 354 (54.2) | 76 (11.6) | 6 (0.9) |
| T12–L1 | 1 (0.2) | 227 (34.8) | 366 (56.0) | 56 (8.6) | 9 (1.4) |
| L1–2 | 0 (0) | 222 (34.0) | 333 (31.0) | 78 (11.9) | 20 (3.1) |
| L2–3 | 0 (0) | 197 (29.7) | 307 (47.0) | 122 (18.7) | 30 (4.6) |
| L3–4 | 0 (0) | 160 (24.5) | 284 (43.5) | 187 (28.6) | 22 (3.4) |
| L4–5 | 0 (0) | 82 (12.6) | 202 (30.9) | 302 (46.2) | 67 (10.3) |
| L5–S1 | 0 (0) | 71 (10.9) | 201 (30.8) | 313 (47.9) | 68 (10.4) |
Values are presented as number (%)
Grade 1, normal shape, no horizontal bands, clear distinction of nucleus and annulus; grade 2, nonhomogeneous shape with horizontal bands, some blurring between nucleus and annulus; grade 3, nonhomogeneous shape with blurring between nucleus and annulus, annulus shape still recognizable; grade 4, nonhomogeneous shape with hypointensity, annulus shape not intact and distinction between nucleus and annulus impossible, disc height usually decreased; grade 5, same as grade 4 but with collapsed disc space.
Fig. 2Pfirrmann grade distribution by age at cervical (A), thoracic (B, C), lumbar levels and whole spine (D).
Comparison of Pfirrmann degeneration between sexes at each disc level in all age decades
| Level | p-value |
|---|---|
| C2–3 | 0.046 |
| C3–4 | 0.782 |
| C4–5 | 0.349 |
| C5–6 | 0.667 |
| C6–7 | 0.678 |
| C7–T1 | 0.742 |
| T1–2 | 0.665 |
| T2–3 | 0.987 |
| T3–4 | 0.787 |
| T4–5 | 0.639 |
| T5–6 | 0.084 |
| T6–7 | 0.050 |
| T7–8 | 0.316 |
| T8–9 | 0.835 |
| T9–10 | 0.268 |
| T10–11 | 0.139 |
| T11–12 | 0.278 |
| T12–L1 | 0.358 |
| L1–2 | 0.783 |
| L2–3 | 0.315 |
| L3–4 | 0.713 |
| L4–5 | 0.008 |
| L5–S1 | 0.179 |
Mann-Whitney U-test
Fig. 3Pfirrmann grade distribution (PfDD) by sex. YO, years old. *** indicated statistically significant difference.
Fig. 4Pfirrmann grade distribution by sex and age. YO, years old. *** indicated statistically significant difference.