STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the serologic marker CA19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients suspected of having a pancreatic disorder. DESIGN: Blinded study of frozen pedigreed serum samples collected at time of diagnostic evaluation with follow-up review at a mean of 8 years. SETTING: A general university teaching hospital serving both primary and referral patient populations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sera collected prospectively from 1978 to 1980 from 261 patients undergoing imaging studies of the pancreas (ultrasound, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) for a variety of symptoms were assayed for CA19-9 levels, and the results were compared with earlier determinations of other potential markers for pancreatic cancer. In 54 patients ultimately shown to have pancreatic cancer, the CA19-9 assay showed a sensitivity of 70% with a median value of 349 u/mL (normal less than 70 u/mL) and range, 7.3 to 2,859,964 u/mL, whereas specificity of the marker in this population was 87%. The positive predictive value was 59%, and the negative predictive value was 92%. Results of CA19-9 testing in the small group of patients with definitive staging information showed no difference in sensitivity between patients with local/regional disease (n = 6) and those with distant metastases (n = 14), 50% compared with 71% (P = 0.613). CONCLUSION: CA19-9 was found to be a more sensitive and specific marker of pancreatic cancer than other serologic markers and should be a useful test in the patient with suspected pancreatic disease.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the serologic marker CA19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients suspected of having a pancreatic disorder. DESIGN: Blinded study of frozen pedigreed serum samples collected at time of diagnostic evaluation with follow-up review at a mean of 8 years. SETTING: A general university teaching hospital serving both primary and referral patient populations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sera collected prospectively from 1978 to 1980 from 261 patients undergoing imaging studies of the pancreas (ultrasound, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) for a variety of symptoms were assayed for CA19-9 levels, and the results were compared with earlier determinations of other potential markers for pancreatic cancer. In 54 patients ultimately shown to have pancreatic cancer, the CA19-9 assay showed a sensitivity of 70% with a median value of 349 u/mL (normal less than 70 u/mL) and range, 7.3 to 2,859,964 u/mL, whereas specificity of the marker in this population was 87%. The positive predictive value was 59%, and the negative predictive value was 92%. Results of CA19-9 testing in the small group of patients with definitive staging information showed no difference in sensitivity between patients with local/regional disease (n = 6) and those with distant metastases (n = 14), 50% compared with 71% (P = 0.613). CONCLUSION: CA19-9 was found to be a more sensitive and specific marker of pancreatic cancer than other serologic markers and should be a useful test in the patient with suspected pancreatic disease.
Authors: Tingting Yue; Katie Partyka; Kevin A Maupin; Mary Hurley; Philip Andrews; Karen Kaul; A James Moser; Herbert Zeh; Randall E Brand; Brian B Haab Journal: Proteomics Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Sheng Pan; Ru Chen; David A Crispin; Damon May; Tyler Stevens; Martin W McIntosh; Mary P Bronner; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Colin M Court; Jacob S Ankeny; Shuang Hou; Hsian-Rong Tseng; James S Tomlinson Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 5.225
Authors: Lei Zhang; James J Farrell; Hui Zhou; David Elashoff; David Akin; No-Hee Park; David Chia; David T Wong Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Katherine E Poruk; D Z Gay; K Brown; J D Mulvihill; K M Boucher; C L Scaife; M A Firpo; S J Mulvihill Journal: Curr Mol Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.222