Grace W Pien1, Lichuan Ye2, Brendan T Keenan3, Greg Maislin3, Erla Björnsdóttir4,5, Erna Sif Arnardottir4,5, Bryndis Benediktsdottir4,5, Thorarinn Gislason4,5, Allan I Pack3,6. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 2. Bouve College of Health Sciences School of Nursing, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 3. Center for Sleep and Circadian Neurobiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Sleep, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 5. Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 6. Division of Sleep Medicine or Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
Study Objectives: Distinct clinical phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been identified: Disturbed Sleep, Minimally Symptomatic, and Sleepy. Determining whether these phenotypes respond differently to standard treatment helps us to create a foundation for personalized therapies. We compared responses to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in these clinical OSA phenotypes. Methods: The study sample included 706 patients from the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort with moderate-to-severe OSA who were prescribed PAP. Linear and logistic mixed models were used to compare 2-year changes in demographics, comorbid diseases, and sleep-related health issues within and across OSA clinical phenotypes. Relationships between changes in symptoms and PAP adherence were also examined. Results: Overall, effect sizes were moderate to large when comparing sleepiness, insomnia-related, and apneic symptom changes in the Sleepy group with changes in other two groups, especially those in the Minimally Symptomatic group. Within the Disturbed Sleep group, PAP users and nonusers demonstrated similar changes in insomnia-related symptoms. The Minimally Symptomatic group remained relatively asymptomatic, but reported significant decreases in daytime sleepiness and physical fatigue; PAP users generally had larger improvements. The Sleepy group had reductions in nearly all measured symptoms, including large reductions in drowsy driving; almost all of these improvements were greater among PAP users than nonusers. Conclusions: OSA treatment response patterns differed by initial clinical phenotype and PAP adherence. Individuals with insomnia-related symptoms may require additional targeted therapy for these complaints. These findings underscore the need for a personalized approach to management that recognizes patients with a range of OSA presentations.
Study Objectives: Distinct clinical phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been identified: Disturbed Sleep, Minimally Symptomatic, and Sleepy. Determining whether these phenotypes respond differently to standard treatment helps us to create a foundation for personalized therapies. We compared responses to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in these clinical OSA phenotypes. Methods: The study sample included 706 patients from the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort with moderate-to-severe OSA who were prescribed PAP. Linear and logistic mixed models were used to compare 2-year changes in demographics, comorbid diseases, and sleep-related health issues within and across OSA clinical phenotypes. Relationships between changes in symptoms and PAP adherence were also examined. Results: Overall, effect sizes were moderate to large when comparing sleepiness, insomnia-related, and apneic symptom changes in the Sleepy group with changes in other two groups, especially those in the Minimally Symptomatic group. Within the Disturbed Sleep group, PAP users and nonusers demonstrated similar changes in insomnia-related symptoms. The Minimally Symptomatic group remained relatively asymptomatic, but reported significant decreases in daytime sleepiness and physical fatigue; PAP users generally had larger improvements. The Sleepy group had reductions in nearly all measured symptoms, including large reductions in drowsy driving; almost all of these improvements were greater among PAP users than nonusers. Conclusions: OSA treatment response patterns differed by initial clinical phenotype and PAP adherence. Individuals with insomnia-related symptoms may require additional targeted therapy for these complaints. These findings underscore the need for a personalized approach to management that recognizes patients with a range of OSA presentations.
Authors: Erla Björnsdóttir; Christer Janson; Jón F Sigurdsson; Philip Gehrman; Michael Perlis; Sigurdur Juliusson; Erna S Arnardottir; Samuel T Kuna; Allan I Pack; Thorarinn Gislason; Bryndis Benediktsdóttir Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Terri E Weaver; Cristina Mancini; Greg Maislin; Jacqueline Cater; Bethany Staley; J Richard Landis; Kathleen A Ferguson; Charles F P George; David A Schulman; Harly Greenberg; David M Rapoport; Joyce A Walsleben; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Indira Gurubhagavatula; Samuel T Kuna Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Terri E Weaver; Greg Maislin; David F Dinges; Thomas Bloxham; Charles F P George; Harly Greenberg; Gihan Kader; Mark Mahowald; Joel Younger; Allan I Pack Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Tarja Saaresranta; Jan Hedner; Maria R Bonsignore; Renata L Riha; Walter T McNicholas; Thomas Penzel; Ulla Anttalainen; John Arthur Kvamme; Martin Pretl; Pawel Sliwinski; Johan Verbraecken; Ludger Grote Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E S Arnardottir; G Maislin; N Jackson; R J Schwab; B Benediktsdottir; K Teff; S Juliusson; A I Pack; T Gislason Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Lucas M Donovan; Aditi Shah; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; Ferran Barbé; Najib T Ayas; Vishesh K Kapur Journal: Chest Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Lucas M Donovan; Lan Yu; Suzanne M Bertisch; Daniel J Buysse; Michael Rueschman; Sanjay R Patel Journal: Chest Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Emerson M Wickwire; Sarah E Tom; Aparna Vadlamani; Montserrat Diaz-Abad; Liesl M Cooper; Abree M Johnson; Steven M Scharf; Jennifer S Albrecht Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.062