Literature DB >> 29300970

Patients' knowledge and attitudes regarding living with implantable electronic devices: results of a multicentre, multinational patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Kristina Hermann Haugaa1,2, Tatjana S Potpara3,4, Serge Boveda5, Jean-Claude Deharo6, Jian Chen7,8, Dan Dobreanu9, Stefano Fumagalli10, Radoslaw Lenarczyk11, Antonio Hernandez Madrid12, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen13, Elena Sciarrafia14, Milos Taborsky15, Roland Richard Tilz16, Paolo Pieragnoli17, Andrzej Przybylski18,19, Nikolaos Dagres20.   

Abstract

The purpose of this patient survey was to analyse the knowledge, experiences, and attitudes regarding cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in patients with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), or cardiac resynchronization devices. Of the 1644 patients with CIEDs from seven European countries, 88% were over 50 years of age. Most patients (90%) knew what device they were implanted with and felt sufficiently informed about the indications for therapy. As many as 42% of patients needed additional information on the battery replacement and limitations in physical activity. The self-reported incidence of complications was 9%, and among these, a quarter of the respondents felt insufficiently informed about the possibility of complications and their management. The majority of patients (83%) were followed by face-to-face visits, which was the most commonly preferred follow-up strategy by the patients. Nearly 75% of the patients reported improved quality of life after device implantation, but about 40% had worries about their device. Less than 20% had discussed with their physician or thought about device handling in the end-of-life circumstances or end-stage disease. Notably, almost 20% of the ICD patients did not wish to answer the question regarding what they wanted to be done with their ICD in case of end-stage disease, indicating the challenges in approaching these issues. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Complications; EHRA survey; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Pacemaker; Patient knowledge; Patient preference

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29300970     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

1.  The first survey on patient needs for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic device in South Korea.

Authors:  You Mi Hwang; Ji-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: What is the best practice?

Authors:  Nikolaos Dagres; Tze-Fan Chao; Guilherme Fenelon; Luis Aguinaga; Daniel Benhayon; Emelia J Benjamin; T Jared Bunch; Lin Yee Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Francisco Darrieux; Angelo de Paola; Laurent Fauchier; Andreas Goette; Jonathan Kalman; Lalit Kalra; Young-Hoon Kim; Deirdre A Lane; Gregory Y H Lip; Steven A Lubitz; Manlio F Márquez; Tatjana Potpara; Domingo Luis Pozzer; Jeremy N Ruskin; Irina Savelieva; Wee Siong Teo; Hung-Fat Tse; Atul Verma; Shu Zhang; Mina K Chung; William-Fernando Bautista-Vargas; Chern-En Chiang; Alejandro Cuesta; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; David S Frankel; Yutao Guo; Robert Hatala; Young Soo Lee; Yuji Murakawa; Cara N Pellegrini; Claudio Pinho; David J Milan; Daniel P Morin; Elenir Nadalin; George Ntaios; Mukund A Prabhu; Marco Proietti; Lena Rivard; Mariana Valentino; Alena Shantsila
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-03-23

3.  Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.

Authors:  Remedios López-Liria; Antonio López-Villegas; César Leal-Costa; Salvador Peiró; Emilio Robles-Musso; Rafael Bautista-Mesa; Patricia Rocamora-Pérez; Knut Tore Lappegård; Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?

Authors:  Knut Tore Lappegård; Frode Moe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A prospective longitudinal study of health-related quality of life and psychological wellbeing after an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with genetic heart diseases.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Tanya Sarina; Joanna Sweeting; Laura Yeates; Kezia Bates; Catherine Spinks; Catherine O'Donnell; Samuel F Sears; Kevin McGeechan; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Involving patients as key stakeholders in the design of cardiovascular implantable electronic device data dashboards: Implications for patient care.

Authors:  Carly Daley; Romisa Rohani Ghahari; Michelle Drouin; Ryan Ahmed; Shauna Wagner; Lauren Reining; Amanda Coupe; Tammy Toscos; Michael Mirro
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-05-11

7.  Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.

Authors:  Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa; Antonio Lopez-Villegas; Salvador Peiro; Daniel Catalan-Matamoros; Emilio Robles-Musso; Remedios Lopez-Liria; Cesar Leal-Costa
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.