Literature DB >> 2930031

Turbinate perimeter ratio as an indicator of conchal atrophy for diagnosis of atrophic rhinitis in pigs.

M T Collins1, L R Bäckström, T A Brim.   

Abstract

Transverse sections of snouts from 171 cross-bred (principally Yorkshire X American Landrace) pigs were evaluated for evidence of turbinate atrophy by use of conventional (atrophic rhinitis [AR] score) and morphometric methods. Of the 171 pigs, 35 were clinically normal (AR score, 0), 65 had mild AR (AR score, 1), 41 had moderate AR (AR score, 2), and 30 had severe AR (AR score, 3). Turbinate cross-sectional area (TA) and the ratio of TA to nostril cross-sectional area, called turbinate area ratio (TAR), had the lowest correlations (r = 0.24 to 0.55) with conventional AR score. Among clinically normal pigs, TA was greater in older pigs as expected, but the TAR values also were significantly (P less than 0.0001) different between 15-week-old pigs (55 kg) and 22-week-old pigs (100 kg). Turbinate perimeter and turbinate perimeter ratio (TPR) were not influenced by pig age or source. The TPR values were closely correlated with subjective visual AR scores (r = 0.73), with AR scores derived by measuring the space between the ventral portion of the scroll and the floor of the nasal cavity (r = 0.72), and the actual size of this space in millimeters (r = 0.71). Mean TPR values for pigs assigned visual AR scores of 0, 1, 2, or 3 were 1.54, 1.25, 0.97, and 0.73, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals around these mean TPR values were discreet and did not overlap. Turbinate perimeter ratio, therefore, may be a more reliable morphometric measure of atrophic rhinitis and also provides parametric data suitable for quantitative analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2930031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  7 in total

1.  Computed axial tomography of the porcine nasal cavity and a morphometric comparison of the nasal turbinates with other visualization techniques.

Authors:  T R Shryock; J M Losonsky; W C Smith; C L Gatlin; C J Francisco; I V Kuriashkin; R B Clarkson; W H Jordan
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  The quantitation of turbinate atrophy in pigs to measure the severity of induced atrophic rhinitis.

Authors:  C L Gatlin; W H Jordan; T R Shryock; W C Smith
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Field trials with a new genetically engineered vaccine for protection against progressive atrophic rhinitis in pigs.

Authors:  A Bording; K Nymark; E Smidt
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Experimental model of atrophic rhinitis in gnotobiotic pigs.

Authors:  M R Ackermann; R B Rimler; J R Thurston
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  An epidemiologic and economic study of respiratory diseases in two conventional Danish swine herds. II: Associations between lesions present at slaughter and mean daily gains during specific intervals of the growth period.

Authors:  L G Paisley; L Vraa-Andersen; L Dybkjaer; K Møller; G Christensen; J Mousing; J F Agger
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  An epidemiologic and economic study of respiratory diseases in two conventional Danish swine herds. I: Prevalence of respiratory lesions at slaughter and their effects on growth.

Authors:  L G Paisley; L Vraa-Andersen; L Dybkjaer; K Møller; G Christensen; J Mousing; J F Agger
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Vaccination against progressive atrophic rhinitis with a recombinant Pasteurella multocida toxin derivative.

Authors:  J P Nielsen; N T Foged; V Sørensen; K Barfod; A Bording; S K Petersen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.