Literature DB >> 29300245

SPRINT in context: meta-analysis of trials with baseline normotension and low levels of previous cardiovascular disease.

Mattias Brunström1, Bo Carlberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of antihypertensive treatment in trials with baseline normotension and low levels of previous cardiovascular disease. To test if the results from SPRINT are compatible with those from other trials, and test the impact of SPRINT results on overall effect estimates.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with at least 1000 patient-years of follow-up, comparing antihypertensive treatment versus placebo, or different blood pressure goals against each other. Trials with at least 50% previous cardiovascular disease were excluded.
RESULTS: Sixteen trials, including 66 816 participants, were included in the meta-analyses. Mean baseline SBP was 138 mmHg, and mean difference between treatment arms was 5.5 mmHg. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with a neutral effect on all-cause mortality [relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.05] and major cardiovascular events (0.97, 0.91-1.03). Results from SPRINT differed significantly from those of other trials (P = 0.012 for all-cause mortality; P = 0.016 for major cardiovascular events), but overall effect estimates were similar when SPRINT was excluded (1.01, 0.95-1.06 for all-cause mortality; 0.98, 0.93-1.03 for major cardiovascular events). Treatment was associated with reduced risk of secondary outcomes stroke (0.84, 0.71-1.00) and heart failure (0.88, 0.78-0.98), although heterogeneity was high in the stroke analysis (I = 54%).
CONCLUSION: SPRINT results are not representative for trials with baseline normotension and low levels of previous cardiovascular disease. Antihypertensive treatment does not protect against death or major cardiovascular events in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29300245     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  1 in total

1.  New guidelines with few takers: will the new American guidelines ever be accepted?

Authors:  Sunil K Nadar; Michael Stowasser
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.012

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.