| Literature DB >> 29299530 |
Stéphanie Hallée1, Justin A Boddey2,3, Alan F Cowman2,3, Dave Richard1.
Abstract
The rhoptry organelle is critical for the invasion of an erythrocyte by the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Despite their critical roles, the mechanisms behind their biogenesis are still poorly defined. Our earlier work had suggested that the interaction between the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored rhoptry-associated membrane antigen (RAMA) and the soluble rhoptry-associated protein 1 was involved in the transport of the latter from the Golgi apparatus to the rhoptry. However, how this protein complex could interact with the intracellular trafficking machinery was unknown at this stage. Here we show that the P. falciparum homologue of the transmembrane protein sortilin-VPS10 interacts with regions of RAMA that are sufficient to target a fluorescent reporter to the rhoptries. These results suggest that P. falciparum sortilin (PfSortilin) could potentially act as the escorter for the transport of rhoptry-destined cargo. IMPORTANCE The malaria parasite is a massive burden in several parts of the world. Worryingly, the parasite has become resistant to several of the drugs commonly used to treat the disease, and at this time, there is no commercial vaccine. It is therefore critical to identify new targets for the development of antimalarials. To survive in the human body, the malaria parasite needs to invade red blood cells. For this, it uses a variety of effectors stored in organelles forming a structure called the apical complex. The mechanisms behind how the parasite generates the apical complex are poorly understood. In this study, we present evidence that a transmembrane protein called sortilin potentially acts as an escorter to transport proteins from the Golgi apparatus to the rhoptries, a component of the apical complex. Our study provides new insight into the biogenesis of a critical structure of the malaria parasite.Entities:
Keywords: malaria; protein trafficking; sortilin
Year: 2018 PMID: 29299530 PMCID: PMC5750388 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00551-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1 Generation of the 3HA-tagged PfSortilin line. (A) Schematic of the knock-in strategy and Southern blot showing proper integration of the plasmid and the disappearance of the WT allele. Pf3D7, P. falciparum 3D7. (B) Western blot showing a specific band at the expected size of around 100 kDa for PfSortilin-3HA. αHA, anti-HA antibody. (C) Time course of expression of PfSortilin-3HA. HSP70 and RON4 are used as staging controls. e. troph, early trophozoites; l. troph, late trophozoites; schiz, schizonts. (D) IFA showing that PfSortilin-3HA is expressed throughout the erythrocytic cycle and partially overlaps with the ER marker BiP in rings and trophozoites. (E) IFA showing extensive colocalization between PfSortilin-3HA and the cis-Golgi marker ERD2 at all stages. (F) IFA showing extensive colocalization between PfSortilin-3HA and the trans-Golgi marker GFP-Rab6 at all stages.
FIG 2 Plasmodium falciparum sortilin localizes to the cis region of the Golgi apparatus. (A) IFA showing extensive colocalization between PfSortilin-3HA and the cis-Golgi marker ERD2. Some overlap is also seen with the trans-Golgi marker GFP-Rab6, while little overlap is obtained with the late endosome marker GFP-Rab7. (B) Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrates that PfSortilin-3HA overlaps significantly more with ERD2 than with either Rab6 or Rab7. Each symbol represents the value for an individual cell. The numbers of cells analyzed (n) are as follows: Rab6 versus PfSortilin-3HA and ERD2 versus PfSortilin-3HA, n = 20; Rab7 versus PfSortilin-3HA, n = 11; Rab6 versus ERD2, n = 14. (C) IFA showing that PfSortilin-3HA does not colocalize with either the micronemal marker AMA1 or the rhoptry markers RAP1 and RAMA. (D) Pearson’s correlation analysis to confirm that PfSortilin-3HA overlaps significantly more with ERD2 than either AMA1, RAP1, or RAMA. PfSortilin-3HA versus RAP1 and PfSortilin-3HA versus ERD2, n = 20; RAP1 versus ERD2, n = 19; PfSortilin-3HA versus AMA1, n = 18. PfSortilin-3HA versus RAMA, n = 10. Values that are significantly different are indicated by bars and asterisks as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001. Values that are not significantly different (NS) are also indicated. P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Values shown below the symbols in panels B and D are the means ± standard errors.
FIG 3 Regions of RAMA interacting with PfSortilin are sufficient for trafficking to the rhoptries. (A) Immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-HA (αHA) shows that PfSortilin-3HA pulls down RAMA but only from DSP-cross-linked parasite lysates. FT, flow through. (B) Schematic of RAMA showing each of the five regions (RAMAA to RAMAE) that were used for further study. (C) Production of recombinant RAMA regions. Coomassie blue-stained gel showing the purification of the recombinant GST-RAMA fragments. (D) In vitro pulldown shows that recombinantly expressed RAMAC and RAMAE interacts with PfSortilin-3HA. The results shown are representative of two experiments using two different protein preparations and two different parasite extracts. (E) mCherry-RAMAC and mCherry-RAMAE fusion proteins traffic to the rhoptries, as confirmed by colocalization with RAP1, while RAMAA, RAMAB, and RAMAD fusions are trafficked to the parasitophorous vacuole (PV), the default destination for proteins harboring a signal sequence. The R coefficient values are means ± standard errors. The numbers of cells analyzed (n) are as follows: n = 10 for both RAMAC versus RAP1 and RAMAE versus RAP1.
List of primers used in this study
| Primer | Sequence | Restriction site |
|---|---|---|
| Sortilin 1306 fw | 5′ ATA | BglII |
| Sortilin stopless rev | 5′ ATA | PstI |
| Rab7 fw | 5′ GC | AvrII |
| Rab7 rev | 5′ TAC | XhoI |
| RamaA fw | 5′ ATA | BamHI |
| RamaA rev | 5′ ATA | XhoI |
| RamaB fw | 5′ ATA | BamHI |
| RamaB rev | 5′ ATA | XhoI |
| RamaC fw | 5′ ATA | BamHI |
| RamaC rev | 5′ ATA | XhoI |
| RamaD fw | 5′ ATA | BamHI |
| RamaD rev | 5′ ATA | XhoI |
| RamaE fw | 5′ ATA | BamHI |
| RamaE rev | 5′ ATA | XhoI |
| RamaA fw | 5′ ATA | MluI |
| RamaA rev | 5′ ATA | SpeI |
| RamaB fw | 5′ ATA | MluI |
| RamaB rev | 5′ ATA | SpeI |
| RamaC fw | 5′ ATA | MluI |
| RamaC rev | 5′ ATA | SpeI |
| RamaD fw | 5′ ATA | MluI |
| RamaD rev | 5′ ATA | SpeI |
| RamaE fw | 5′ ATA | MluI |
| RamaE rev | 5′ ATA | SpeI |
fw, forward; rev, reverse.
Restriction sites are underlined.