Literature DB >> 29299111

Genome sequence of Acuticoccus yangtzensis JL1095T (DSM 28604T) isolated from the Yangtze Estuary.

Lei Hou1,2, Jia Sun1,2, Xiabing Xie1,2, Nianzhi Jiao1,2, Yao Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

Acuticoccus yangtzensis JL1095T is a proteobacterium from a genus belonging to the family Rhodobacteraceae; it was isolated from surface waters of the Yangtze Estuary, China. This strain displays the capability to utilize aromatic and simple carbon compounds. Here, we present the genome sequence, annotations, and features of A. yangtzensis JL1095T. This strain has a genome size of 5,043,263 bp with a G + C content of 68.63%. The genome contains 4286 protein-coding genes, 56 RNA genes, and 83 pseudo genes. Many of the protein-coding genes were predicted to encode proteins involved in carbon metabolism pathways, such as aromatic degradation and methane metabolism. Notably, a total of 31 genes were predicted to encode form II carbon monoxide dehydrogenases, suggesting potential for carbon monoxide oxidation. The genome analysis helps better understand the major carbon metabolic pathways of this strain and its role in carbon cycling in coastal marine ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acuticoccus yangtzensis JL1095T; Aerobic CO oxidation; Aromatic compounds degradation; Form II CODH; Methane metabolism; Yangtze estuary

Year:  2017        PMID: 29299111      PMCID: PMC5747140          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0295-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

We isolated a member in the family 10.1601/nm.1037, 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T (= 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCGMCC+1.12795 = 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+28604), from surface waters of the Yangtze Estuary, China (31° N, 122° E) [1, 2]. The physiological properties of members in the family 10.1601/nm.1037 suggest that they may be important in regulating the carbon cycle in terrestrial and marine ecosystems. For instance, many members of this family can degrade aromatic compounds [3] and metabolize one-carbon compounds [4]. Physiological tests of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T have shown that strain JL1095T was able to degrade naphthol-AS-BI-phosphate, and utilize acetic acid and glycerol [1]. In addition, many members of the family 10.1601/nm.1037 examined to date have the ability to oxidize CO. CO is an important atmospheric trace gas that contributes to climate change despite its low concentrations (0.05–0.12 ppm) in air [5]. Although CO is toxic for many organisms, a number of microbes can consume CO. Marine microbial CO oxidation represents an important CO sink in the oceans. CODHs, key enzymes for CO oxidation, have been classified into two major types based on their cofactor composition, structure, and stability in the presence of dioxygen [6]. Ni- and Fe-containing CODHs are found in anaerobic bacteria and archaea, while Cu- and Mo-containing CODHs are found in aerobic bacteria [7]. Compared with the relatively hypoxic and high CO concentrations in the early Earth environment [8], the ecological significance of aerobic CO oxidation has become increasingly critical in the relatively aerobic and low CO concentrations in modern environments. Aerobic CO oxidation is carried out by phylogenetically and physiologically diverse aerobic bacteria and certain newly identified archaea that are distributed in a variety of habitats, including terrestrial, sedimentary, freshwater, and marine ecosystems [9]. The most active CO oxidizers belong to various genera, such as 10.1601/nm.1144, 10.1601/nm.1134, 10.1601/nm.1155 and 10.1601/nm.1150, mostly from the family 10.1601/nm.1037 [10, 11]. Based on phylogenic analysis of 16S rRNA sequences and physiological characteristics, 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T is most closely related to the genus 10.1601/nm.1155 [1], in which all known and examined to date have the ability to oxidize CO, containing form I and II cox gene operons [12-14]. In this study, we describe the classification and features of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T, report its first draft genome sequence, and explore its major carbon metabolic pathways and potential capability to oxidize CO.

Organism information

Classification and features

10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T (= 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCGMCC+1.12795 = 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+28604), as the type strain of 10.1601/nm.26592 in the family 10.1601/nm.1037, is a Gram-negative, aerobic, motile (possibly through gliding), oval-shaped with one peak end bacterium (Fig. 1). The detailed classification and features were previously reported [1, 2]. Briefly, the solo-carbon-source utilization test indicated that Tween 40, Tween 80, L-arabinose, methyl-pyruvate, β-hydroxy butyric acid, D,L-lactic acid, acetic acid, urocanic acid, α-hydroxy butyric acid, γ-hydroxy butyric acid, L-proline, glycerol, α-keto butyric acid, D-fructose, L-fucose, D-galactose, α-D-glucose, D-mannose, L-serine, D-sorbitol, D-gluconic acid, α-keto glutaric acid, succinamic acid, L-glutamic acid, pyruvate, and gelatin were utilized by this strain. In addition, strain JL1095T produces various enzymes for the degradation of organic matter, including urease, protease, alkaline phosphatase enzyme, esterase (C4), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, trypsin and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphate hydrolase [1]. The current classification and general features of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T are listed in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Transmission electron micrographs of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T cultured on marine agar 2216 (MA; Difco) medium. a Oval-shaped cells with one peak end; b a cell divided by binary fission. Scale bar, 0.5 μm

Table 1

Classification and general features of 10.1601/nm.26592 strain JL1095T [16]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [30]
Phylum 10.1601/nm.808 TAS [31]
Class 10.1601/nm.809 TAS [32]
Order 10.1601/nm.1036 TAS [33]
Family 10.1601/nm.1037 TAS [33]
Genus 10.1601/nm.26591 TAS [1, 2]
Species 10.1601/nm.26592 TAS [1, 2]
Type strain: JL1095 T (= 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCGMCC+1.12795 = 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+28604 )
Gram stainNegativeTAS [1]
Cell shapeOval-shaped with one peak endTAS [1]
MotilityMotileTAS [1]
SporulationNot reportedNAS
Temperature range15–50 °CTAS [1]
Optimum temperature35 °CTAS [1]
pH range; Optimum6.0–9.0; 7.6TAS [1]
Carbon sourceTween 40, Tween 80, L-arabinose, methyl-pyruvate, D,L-Lactic acid, acetic acid, urocanic acid, α-hydroxy butyric acid, β-hydroxy butyric acid and γ-hydroxy butyric acidTAS [1]
MIGS-6HabitatEstuaryTAS [1]
MIGS-6.3Salinity2–10% NaCl (w/v)TAS [1]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicTAS [1]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationYangtze Estuary, ChinaTAS [1]
MIGS-5Sample collectionJanuary 2006IDA
MIGS-4.1Latitude31° NTAS [1]
MIGS-4.2Longitude122° ETAS [1]
MIGS-4.4AltitudeSea levelTAS [1]

aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [22]

Transmission electron micrographs of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T cultured on marine agar 2216 (MA; Difco) medium. a Oval-shaped cells with one peak end; b a cell divided by binary fission. Scale bar, 0.5 μm Classification and general features of 10.1601/nm.26592 strain JL1095T [16] aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [22] The draft genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T has one full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence (1450 bp; BIX52_RS22260) that was consistent with the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence from the original species description (1397 bp; KF741873) [1]. Strain JL1095T showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with 10.1601/nm.17875 B106T (92.7%) followed by 10.1601/nm.1155 stellata 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DIAM+12621 T (92.6%) and 10.1601/nm.25296 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+22153 T (92.3%). The phylogenetic tree was constructed to assess the evolutionary relationships between strain JL1095T and other related strains with the MEGA 5.05 software by using a neighbor-joining algorithm with the Jukes-Cantor model. The phylogeny of the strain JL1095T illustrated that one monophyletic branch is formed at the periphery of the evolutionary radiation occupied by the various genera in the family 10.1601/nm.1037 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree illustrating the relationship between 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and other validly published species. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method for 16S rRNA gene sequences. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. Reference sequences from relative strains that has been sequenced and obtained a public genome are in blue font, while the JL1095T sequence is in blue bold font. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. 10.1601/nm.2054 S2T was used to root the tree

Phylogenetic tree illustrating the relationship between 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and other validly published species. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method for 16S rRNA gene sequences. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. Reference sequences from relative strains that has been sequenced and obtained a public genome are in blue font, while the JL1095T sequence is in blue bold font. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. 10.1601/nm.2054 S2T was used to root the tree

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This strain was selected for sequencing on the basis of its important evolutionary position, the degradation of aromatic and simple hydrocarbon compounds via metabolism [1], and its potential CO oxidation ability. The sequencing of the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome was carried out at Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. The genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T has been deposited in the GOLD [15] and DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number MJUX00000000. A summary for the genome sequencing information of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T is listed in Table 2, in compliance with MIGS version 2.0 [16].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityHigh-quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries used500 bp Paired-end
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq 2500
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage331X
MIGS 30AssemblersSOAPdenovo version 2.04
MIGS 32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS version 4.17
Locus TagBIX52
Genbank ID MJUX00000000
GenBank Date of ReleaseDecember 31th, 2016
GOLD IDGp0206530
BIOPROJECT PRJNA343888
MIGS 13Source Material Identifier 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCGMCC+1.12795=10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+28604
Project relevanceEnvironmental, microbes
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T (= 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCGMCC+1.12795 = 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+28604) was cultivated aerobically in MB (Difco) medium. The genomic DNA of strain JL1095T was extracted using the Tguide Bacteria Genomic DNA Kit (OSR-M502, TIANGEN Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) in accordance with the instruction manual. After this strain was cultivated in MB medium in the shaker at 35 °C for 2–3 days, the total DNA obtained was subjected to quality control by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, MA, USA).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome sequencing of this strain was conducted using Illumina HiSeq 2500 paired-end sequencing technology under the PE 150 strategy. A total filtered read size of 1674 Mbp was obtained. The filtered reads were assembled by SOAPdenovo version 2.04 software and 29 contigs were generated [17, 18]. Gene prediction was performed on the genome assembly using GeneMarkS version 4.17 [19].

Genome annotation

Functional annotation of the coding sequences was performed by searching various databases (KEGG [20], NR, COG [21], and GO [22]). The rRNA genes of strain JL1095T were predicted using rRNAmmer software [23], tRNA genes were identified using tRNAscan-SE [24], and sRNA were predicted by BLAST searches against the Rfam database [25]. The online CRISPRFinder program was used for CRISPR identification [26].

Genome properties

The 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome was composed of 5,043,263 bp with a G + C content of 68.63%. A total of 4286 protein-coding genes were predicted with an average length of 994 bp, occupying 87.01% of the genome. The genome also contained 56 RNA genes and 83 pseudo genes. Detailed genome statistical information is shown in Table 3. COG categories were assigned to 2522 of the protein-coding genes which were classified into 21 functional groups. The most dominant COG categories were “amino acid transport and metabolism” followed by “general function prediction only”, “function unknown”, and “energy production and conversion”. Detailed gene numbers and percentages related with the COG categories are shown in Table 4. In total, 2470 protein-coding genes were assigned to 153 KEGG metabolic pathways, including key genes involved in carbon metabolism processes such as gluconeogenesis, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation, and methane metabolism. In addition, based on the GO database, 1992 protein-coding genes were assigned to molecular function, 1394 genes were assigned to cellular components, and 2646 genes were assigned to biological processes.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)5,043,263100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,388,14387.01
DNA G + C (bp)3,461,19168.63
DNA scaffolds28100.00
Total genes4425100.00
Protein coding genes428696.86
RNA genes561.27
Pseudo genes831.88
Genes in internal clustersNANA
Genes with function prediction378185.45
Genes assigned to COGs252256.99
Genes with Pfam domains313970.94
Genes with signal peptides3487.86
Genes with transmembrane helices104323.57
CRISPR repeats30.07

NA, no analysis

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J1623.78Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A00.00RNA processing and modification
K1393.24Transcription
L1112.59Replication, recombination and repair
B30.07Chromatin structure and dynamics
D190.44Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V200.47Defense mechanisms
T932.17Signal transduction mechanisms
M1262.94Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N300.70Cell motility
U431.00Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1112.59Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2235.20Energy production and conversion
G1984.62Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E3889.05Amino acid transport and metabolism
F631.47Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1222.85Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1383.22Lipid transport and metabolism
P1874.36Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q1092.54Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3788.82General function prediction only
S2325.41Function unknown
176441.16Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics NA, no analysis Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

We performed a systematic analysis of the protein-coding genes with functional predictions by BLAST searches against the four databases (KEGG, NR, COG, and GO), with E-value <1e − 5 and minimal alignment length of >40%. Strain JL1095T was predicted to contain most of the genes central to carbon metabolism, including those related to glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Furthermore, about 198 genes were assigned to COG categories related to carbohydrate transport and metabolism, including fructose, mannose, and galactose metabolism. These carbohydrate metabolic characteristics are generally coincident with those obtained from a sole-carbon-source utilization experiment [1]. The capacity of this strain to degrade aromatic compounds such as naphthol-AS-BI-phosphate has been identified. Approximately 236 genes were involved in 13 KEGG metabolic pathways related to aromatic compounds degradation, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, bisphenol, and naphthalene. Aromatic compounds are important environmental organic pollutants because of their persistence in environments, toxicity, and carcinogenic characteristics [27]. Furthurmore, strain JL1095T was annotated to contain 48 genes related to methane metabolism. Based on results from the four functional annotation databases, the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome contained a total of 31 genes predicted to encode aerobic-type CODHs (Additional file 1: Table S1). The cox gene clusters that encode aerobic CODHs have been classified into two major forms based on genome analysis [9]. Form I genes are mainly from 10.1601/nm.1489, 10.1601/nm.6310 and 10.1601/nm.2552, and form II putative genes are mainly from 10.1601/nm.1459, 10.1601/nm.1414, and 10.1601/nm.1339 [13]. Form I and II cox gene operons consisted of three conserved structural genes that were transcribed as coxMSL and coxSLM, respectively [28, 29]. For strain JL1095T, three structural genes containing coxS (small subunit), coxM (medium subunit) and coxL (large subunit) were all sequenced. Form I coxS and coxM gene sequences were similar to form II coxS and coxM gene sequences, but the form II putative coxL gene sequence was approximately 40–50% similar to the form I coxL gene sequence [9]. Therefore, the coxL gene has been used as a molecular biomarker to explore the distribution of aerobic CO bacteria in ecosystems [29]. We constructed the coxL phylogenetic tree for strain JL1095T and confirmed that four predicted coxL genes (Locus tag: BIX52_RS02480, BIX52_RS05715, BIX52_RS17810 and BIX52_RS18370) were recognized as form II coxL genes (Fig. 3). Additionally, the accessory genes were also essential for CO oxidation to take place. The accessory genes in forms I and II varied substantially, and even within the same form, the order and subunit types varied among isolates [9]. Form I cox accessory genes, including coxB, C, G, H, I, and K, were distributed flexibly around the structural genes. Among the form II cox accessory genes, coxG was usually an indispensable gene compared with other accessory genes, such as coxD, E, and F [28]. For this strain, the accessory gene coxG was detected. Form I CODH has been specifically characterized for its ability to oxidize CO, while form II is a putative CODH and its ability to oxidize CO remains uncertain. For the 10.1601/nm.1134 clade, both coxL forms were present, which enables them to oxidize CO [11]. Phylogenetic analysis using the 16S rRNA gene sequences of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and 10.1601/nm.1134 clade bacteria indicates that JL1095T does not belong to the 10.1601/nm.1134 clade (Fig. 4). However, many other bacteria containing only form II cox genes have been shown by molecular and culture-based methods to oxidize CO, including 10.1601/nm.1414 sp. strain NMB1, 10.1601/nm.1415, 10.1601/nm.1402 sp. strain COX, 10.1601/nm.1573 sp. strain COX, and 10.1601/nm.1619 sp. strain LUP [13]. According to the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), the coxL genes of JL1095T clustered tightly with these bacterial isolates. Thus, we speculate that JL1095T is capable of oxidizing CO. Future studies are needed to determine its function in CO oxidation.
Fig. 3

Unrooted phylogenetic tree showing the coxL genetype of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on the form I coxL and form II putative coxL genes from CO-oxidizing microbes. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. The coxL genes encoded in the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome are shown in bold. Sequences in orange and blue shades represent form I and II coxL genes, respectively. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position

Fig. 4

Unrooted phylogenetic tree displaying the relationship between 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and 10.1601/nm.1134 clade bacteria. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. The 16S rRNA gene encoded in the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome is shown in bold. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position

Unrooted phylogenetic tree showing the coxL genetype of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on the form I coxL and form II putative coxL genes from CO-oxidizing microbes. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. The coxL genes encoded in the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome are shown in bold. Sequences in orange and blue shades represent form I and II coxL genes, respectively. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position Unrooted phylogenetic tree displaying the relationship between 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and 10.1601/nm.1134 clade bacteria. The tree was constructed with MEGA 5.05 software by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Accession numbers in the GenBank database are shown in parentheses. The 16S rRNA gene encoded in the 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T genome is shown in bold. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replicates; only values higher than 50% are shown. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position

Conclusions

In the present study, the genome of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T, the type strain of 10.1601/nm.26592, was characterized. It contains numerous genes involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism, aromatic compounds degradation, and methane metabolism. Knowledge of the genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T lays a foundation for better understanding the carbon metabolism of this strain. Based on genome analysis, we speculate that JL1095T is capable of oxidizing CO. Future studies are needed to determine its function in CO oxidation. These genomic data provide insight into the carbon metabolic characteristics of 10.1601/nm.26592 JL1095T and its role in alleviating coastal water pollution and effects on the marine carbon cycle.
  28 in total

1.  The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Susumu Goto; Shuichi Kawashima; Yasushi Okuno; Masahiro Hattori
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Diversity of the ring-cleaving dioxygenase gene pcaH in a salt marsh bacterial community.

Authors:  A Buchan; E L Neidle; M A Moran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sequence analysis, characterization and CO-specific transcription of the cox gene cluster on the megaplasmid pHCG3 of Oligotropha carboxidovorans.

Authors:  B Santiago; U Schübel; C Egelseer; O Meyer
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-08-05       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Methylarcula marina gen. nov., sp. nov. and Methylarcula terricola sp. nov.: novel aerobic, moderately halophilic, facultatively methylotrophic bacteria from coastal saline environments.

Authors:  N V Doronina; Y A Trotsenko; T P Tourova
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Unexpected diversity of bacteria capable of carbon monoxide oxidation in a coastal marine environment, and contribution of the Roseobacter-associated clade to total CO oxidation.

Authors:  J D Tolli; S M Sievert; C D Taylor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Carbon dioxide activation at the Ni,Fe-cluster of anaerobic carbon monoxide dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Jae-Hun Jeoung; Holger Dobbek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments of rivers and an estuary in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Ling Chen; Zhao Jianfu; Huang Qinghui; Zhu Zhiliang; Gao Hongwen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.

Authors:  Roman L Tatusov; Natalie D Fedorova; John D Jackson; Aviva R Jacobs; Boris Kiryutin; Eugene V Koonin; Dmitri M Krylov; Raja Mazumder; Sergei L Mekhedov; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; B Sridhar Rao; Sergei Smirnov; Alexander V Sverdlov; Sona Vasudevan; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie J Yin; Darren A Natale
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.