Brittany Baranski1, Jennifer Bolt2, Lori Albers3, Rabiah Siddiqui4, Ali Bell5, William Semchuk6. 1. , BSc BSP, ACPR, was, at the time of this project, with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan. She is now with the Saskatoon Co-Op, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 2. , BScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, was, at the time of this project, with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan. She is now with the Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia. 3. , BSP, ACPR, is with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan. 4. , BScPhm, ACPR, is with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan. 5. , MSc, is with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan. 6. , MSc, PharmD, FCSHP, is with the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Documentation of information in the health record by pharmacists is vital to patient care. Failure to document, or failure to document appropriately, may have negative effects on patients. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine pharmacists' competency in 18 elements of chart note documentation at 2 tertiary care centres and 1 rehabilitation centre. The secondary objectives were to quantify the number of episodes of documentation by pharmacists, to characterize the clinical activities associated with this documentation, and to determine whether there were differences in level of competency according to years of hospital experience, additional clinical training, and note type. METHODS: This study used prospective audit methodology. Notes documented during a 6-week study period (February to April 2015) were assessed using a rubric specifically created to evaluate 18 of the essential elements of documentation, as defined by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Four of the elements of chart note documentation were assessed on a yes/no basis, and Bloom's taxonomy was used to define the level of competency for the other 14 elements. Values were assigned to each level and were then used to calculate mean scores. RESULTS: A total of 115 pharmacist notes, created by 29 of the 35 pharmacists included in the study, were assessed. The mean competency score per pharmacist was 2.2 (standard deviation [SD] 0.3; maximum score 3). Elements of documentation with the highest level of competency were diplomatic tone, conciseness, and clarity; elements with the lowest level of competency were medication list, note title, monitoring, and drug-related problem statements. The most frequent note types concerned drug-related problems (50 [43%]), pharmacokinetics (25 [22%]), and patient education (19 [17%]). Levels of competency were highest for notes related to patient education (mean 2.4, SD 0.2) and lowest for notes concerning drug-related problems (mean 2.1, SD 0.3) and notes providing clarification (mean 2.1, SD 0.3). The level of competency was not significantly affected by additional clinical training or years of hospital experience. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists in this study documented concisely, clearly, and in a diplomatic tone; however, there was room for improvement in the frequency and elements of chart note documentation in the patient health record.
BACKGROUND: Documentation of information in the health record by pharmacists is vital to patient care. Failure to document, or failure to document appropriately, may have negative effects on patients. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine pharmacists' competency in 18 elements of chart note documentation at 2 tertiary care centres and 1 rehabilitation centre. The secondary objectives were to quantify the number of episodes of documentation by pharmacists, to characterize the clinical activities associated with this documentation, and to determine whether there were differences in level of competency according to years of hospital experience, additional clinical training, and note type. METHODS: This study used prospective audit methodology. Notes documented during a 6-week study period (February to April 2015) were assessed using a rubric specifically created to evaluate 18 of the essential elements of documentation, as defined by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Four of the elements of chart note documentation were assessed on a yes/no basis, and Bloom's taxonomy was used to define the level of competency for the other 14 elements. Values were assigned to each level and were then used to calculate mean scores. RESULTS: A total of 115 pharmacist notes, created by 29 of the 35 pharmacists included in the study, were assessed. The mean competency score per pharmacist was 2.2 (standard deviation [SD] 0.3; maximum score 3). Elements of documentation with the highest level of competency were diplomatic tone, conciseness, and clarity; elements with the lowest level of competency were medication list, note title, monitoring, and drug-related problem statements. The most frequent note types concerned drug-related problems (50 [43%]), pharmacokinetics (25 [22%]), and patient education (19 [17%]). Levels of competency were highest for notes related to patient education (mean 2.4, SD 0.2) and lowest for notes concerning drug-related problems (mean 2.1, SD 0.3) and notes providing clarification (mean 2.1, SD 0.3). The level of competency was not significantly affected by additional clinical training or years of hospital experience. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists in this study documented concisely, clearly, and in a diplomatic tone; however, there was room for improvement in the frequency and elements of chart note documentation in the patient health record.
Authors: Jay D Currie; William R Doucette; Julie Kuhle; Jenelle Sobotka; William A Miller; Randal P McDonough; Angela L Tice Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) Date: 2003-01
Authors: Mark J Makowsky; Theresa J Schindel; Meagen Rosenthal; Katy Campbell; Ross T Tsuyuki; Helen M Madill Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.338