| Literature DB >> 29298624 |
Mário L de Lemos1, Carrie Kung1, Victoria Kletas1, Nadine Badry1, Isabell Kang1.
Abstract
Since the introduction of regulatory drug approval guidance on the evaluation of QT interval prolongation, an increasing number of drug monographs has included cautions on the risk of QT prolongation. For example, QT prolongation is mentioned in the Canadian product monographs of 29 drugs commonly seen in oncology practice. This presents two major challenges. First, most guidelines and risk predictive tools for QT prolongation have been developed for hospitalized patients in acute care settings. In contrast, most QT-prolonging oncology drugs are used in medically stable patients in the ambulatory setting. Second, many oncology drugs are unique for their indications and non-QT prolonging alternative agents are often not available. In this review, we will outline an empiric initial approach to ambulatory cancer patients who are treated with oncology drugs which may prolong QT interval. This includes the predictive value of QT prolongation on torsades de pointes, the risk factors of the patients and the drugs, and the limitations of existing guidance in this area.Entities:
Keywords: Antineoplastic agents; long QT syndrome; torsades de pointes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29298624 DOI: 10.1177/1078155217748735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol Pharm Pract ISSN: 1078-1552 Impact factor: 1.809