Literature DB >> 29298387

Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.

Amgad Elgowainy1, Jeongwoo Han1, Jacob Ward2, Fred Joseck2, David Gohlke1, Alicia Lindauer2, Todd Ramsden3, Mary Biddy3, Mark Alexander4, Steven Barnhart5, Ian Sutherland6, Laura Verduzco7, Timothy J Wallington8.   

Abstract

This article presents a cradle-to-grave (C2G) assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs for current (2015) and future (2025-2030) light-duty vehicles. The analysis addressed both fuel cycle and vehicle manufacturing cycle for the following vehicle types: gasoline and diesel internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), flex fuel vehicles, compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Gasoline ICEVs using current technology have C2G emissions of ∼450 gCO2e/mi (grams of carbon dioxide equivalents per mile), while C2G emissions from HEVs, PHEVs, H2 FCEVs, and BEVs range from 300-350 gCO2e/mi. Future vehicle efficiency gains are expected to reduce emissions to ∼350 gCO2/mi for ICEVs and ∼250 gCO2e/mi for HEVs, PHEVs, FCEVs, and BEVs. Utilizing low-carbon fuel pathways yields GHG reductions more than double those achieved by vehicle efficiency gains alone. Levelized costs of driving (LCDs) are in the range $0.25-$1.00/mi depending on time frame and vehicle-fuel technology. In all cases, vehicle cost represents the major (60-90%) contribution to LCDs. Currently, HEV and PHEV petroleum-fueled vehicles provide the most attractive cost in terms of avoided carbon emissions, although they offer lower potential GHG reductions. The ranges of LCD and cost of avoided carbon are narrower for the future technology pathways, reflecting the expected economic competitiveness of these alternative vehicles and fuels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29298387     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  2 in total

Review 1.  Development of Rhodococcus opacus as a chassis for lignin valorization and bioproduction of high-value compounds.

Authors:  Winston E Anthony; Rhiannon R Carr; Drew M DeLorenzo; Tayte P Campbell; Zeyu Shang; Marcus Foston; Tae Seok Moon; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  Drone flight data reveal energy and greenhouse gas emissions savings for very small package delivery.

Authors:  Thiago A Rodrigues; Jay Patrikar; Natalia L Oliveira; H Scott Matthews; Sebastian Scherer; Constantine Samaras
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.