Literature DB >> 29298120

Dissociating Orienting Biases From Integration Effects With Eye Movements.

Matthew D Hilchey1, Jason Rajsic1, Greg Huffman1, Raymond M Klein2, Jay Pratt1.   

Abstract

Despite decades of research, the conditions under which shifts of attention to prior target locations are facilitated or inhibited remain unknown. This ambiguity is a product of the popular feature discrimination task, in which attentional bias is commonly inferred from the efficiency by which a stimulus feature is discriminated after its location has been repeated or changed. Problematically, these tasks lead to integration effects; effects of target-location repetition appear to depend entirely on whether the target feature or response also repeats, allowing for several possible inferences about orienting bias. To parcel out integration effects and orienting biases, we designed the present experiments to require localized eye movements and manual discrimination responses to serially presented targets with randomly repeating locations. Eye movements revealed consistent biases away from prior target locations. Manual discrimination responses revealed integration effects. These data collectively revealed inhibited reorienting and integration effects, which resolve the ambiguity and reconcile episodic integration and attentional orienting accounts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  episodic memory; eye movements; implicit memory; selective attention; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29298120     DOI: 10.1177/0956797617734021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  6 in total

1.  Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Victoria Antinucci; Dominique Lamy; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

2.  Location-response binding and inhibition of return in a detection task.

Authors:  Hsuan-Fu Chao; Fei-Shan Hsiao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Visual working memory load does not eliminate visuomotor repetition effects.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Matthew D Hilchey; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Oculomotor inhibition and location priming in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Nicholas Gaspelin; Benjamin M Robinson; Britta Hahn; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-08

5.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Markus Lappe; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.