Literature DB >> 29297935

In situ downstream strategies for cost-effective bio/surfactant recovery.

Ziba Najmi1, Gholamhossein Ebrahimipour1, Andrea Franzetti2, Ibrahim M Banat3.   

Abstract

Since 60-80% of total costs of production are usually associated with downstream collection, separation, and purification processes, it has become advantageous to investigate how to replace traditional methods with efficient and cost-effective alternative techniques for recovery and purification of biosurfactants. In the traditional techniques, large volumes of organic solvents are usually used for increasing production cost and the overall environmental burden. In addition, traditional production and separation methods typically carried out in batch cultures reduce biosurfactant yields due to product inhibition and lower biosurfactants activity as a result of interaction with the organic solvents used. However, some in situ recovery methods that allow continuous separation of bioproducts from culture broth leading to an improvement in yield production and fermentation efficiency. For biosurfactants commercialization, enhancement of product capacity of the separation methods and the rate of product removal is critical. Recently, interest in the integration of separation methods with a production step as rapid and efficient techniques has been increasing. This review focuses on the technology gains and potentials for the most common methods used in in situ product removal: foam fractionation and ultrafiltration, especially used to recover and purify two well-known biosurfactants: glycolipids (rhamnolipids) and lipopeptides (surfactins).
© 2018 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosurfactants; foam fraction; rhamnolipids; surfactins; ultrafiltration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29297935     DOI: 10.1002/bab.1641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem        ISSN: 0885-4513            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

Review 1.  Extreme environments: a source of biosurfactants for biotechnological applications.

Authors:  Júnia Schultz; Alexandre Soares Rosado
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Process Development in Biosurfactant Production.

Authors:  Robert W M Pott; Janis Von Johannides
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.635

3.  Insight into the surfactin production of Bacillus velezensis B006 through metabolomics analysis.

Authors:  Junqiang Wang; Rongjun Guo; Wenchao Wang; Guizhen Ma; Shidong Li
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Development of a Bioprocess for the Production of Cyclic Lipopeptides Pseudofactins With Efficient Purification From Collected Foam.

Authors:  Piotr Biniarz; Marius Henkel; Rudolf Hausmann; Marcin Łukaszewicz
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-23

5.  Exploiting RNA thermometer-driven molecular bioprocess control as a concept for heterologous rhamnolipid production.

Authors:  Philipp Noll; Chantal Treinen; Sven Müller; Lars Lilge; Rudolf Hausmann; Marius Henkel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Fungal biosurfactants, from nature to biotechnological product: bioprospection, production and potential applications.

Authors:  André Felipe da Silva; Ibrahim M Banat; Admir José Giachini; Diogo Robl
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Genetic Cell-Surface Modification for Optimized Foam Fractionation.

Authors:  Christian C Blesken; Isabel Bator; Christian Eberlein; Hermann J Heipieper; Till Tiso; Lars M Blank
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.