Literature DB >> 29297497

Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

David J Grignon1.   

Abstract

Prostatic adenocarcinoma remains the most common cancer affecting men. A substantial majority of patients have the diagnosis made on thin needle biopsies, most often in the absence of a palpable abnormality. Treatment choices ranging from surveillance to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy are largely driven by the pathologic findings in the biopsy specimen. The first part of this review focuses on important morphologic parameters in needle biopsy specimens that are not covered in the accompanying articles. This includes tumor quantification as well as other parameters such a extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. For those men who undergo radical prostatectomy, pathologic stage and other parameters are critical in prognostication and in determining the appropriateness of adjuvant therapy. Staging parameters, including extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node status are discussed here. Surgical margin status is also an important parameter and definitions and reporting of this feature are detailed. Throughout the article the current reporting guidelines published by the College of American Pathologists and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29297497     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  9 in total

1.  Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Through Quantitative Assessment of PTEN Loss (qPTEN).

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; Palak G Patel; Yi Niu; Thiago Vidotto; Isabelle Caven; Rachel Livergant; Winnie Fu; Atsunari Kawashima; Nathan How; John B Okello; Liana B Guedes; Veronique Ouellet; Clarissa Picanço; Madhuri Koti; Rodolfo B Reis; Fred Saad; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Tamara L Lotan; Jeremy A Squire; Yingwei P Peng; D Robert Siemens; David M Berman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  The Cooked Meat Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine Hair Dosimeter, DNA Adductomics Discovery, and Associations with Prostate Cancer Pathology Biomarkers.

Authors:  Jingshu Guo; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Scott J Walmsley; Peter W Villalta; Lihua Yao; Paari Murugan; Resha Tejpaul; Christopher J Weight; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.973

Review 3.  Oxidative stress and redox signaling in CRPC progression: therapeutic potential of clinically-tested Nrf2-activators.

Authors:  Debasis Mondal; Devin Narwani; Shahnawaz Notta; Dawood Ghaffar; Nikhil Mardhekar; Syed S A Quadri
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Kimmo Kartasalo; Peter Ström; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Hemamali Samaratunga; Brett Delahunt; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Martin Eklund; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.535

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tae Il Noh; Jong Hyun Tae; Hyung Keun Kim; Ji Sung Shim; Sung Gu Kang; Deuk Jae Sung; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Seok Ho Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  A Panel of Urinary Volatile Biomarkers for Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer from Other Urological Cancers.

Authors:  Ana Rita Lima; Joana Pinto; Carina Carvalho-Maia; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Márcia Carvalho; Paula Guedes de Pinho
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Clinicopathological Analysis of the ISUP Grade Group And Other Parameters in Prostate Cancer: Elucidation of Mutual Impact of the Various Parameters.

Authors:  Yoichiro Okubo; Shinya Sato; Kimito Osaka; Yayoi Yamamoto; Takahisa Suzuki; Arika Ida; Emi Yoshioka; Masaki Suzuki; Kota Washimi; Tomoyuki Yokose; Takeshi Kishida; Yohei Miyagi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival Among Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Based on the Competing Risk Model: Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Xianghong Zhou; Shi Qiu; Kun Jin; Qiming Yuan; Di Jin; Zilong Zhang; Xiaonan Zheng; Jiakun Li; Qiang Wei; Lu Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-26

9.  Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Wolfgang M Thaiss; Simone Moser; Tobias Hepp; Stephan Kruck; Steffen Rausch; Marcus Scharpf; Konstantin Nikolaou; Arnulf Stenzl; Jens Bedke; Sascha Kaufmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.661

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.