Literature DB >> 29297232

Dosimetric quantification of the incidental irradiation of the 'true' (deep) ano-inguinal lymphatic drainage of anal cancer patients not described in conventional contouring guidelines.

Hendrik Dapper1, Gregor Habl1, Christoph Hirche2, Stefan Münch1, Markus Oechsner1, Michael Mayinger1, Christina Sauter1, Stephanie E Combs1,3,4, Daniel Habermehl1,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ano-inguinal lymphatic drainage (AILD) is located in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of the proximal medial thigh. Findings from fluorescence methods give us new information about anatomical conditions of the AILD. Current contouring guidelines do not advise the inclusion of the 'true' AILD into the clinical target volume (CTV). Aim of this work was the retrospective analysis of the incidental dose to the AILD in an anal cancer (AC) patient cohort who underwent definitive chemoradiation (CRT) therapy with Volumetric Arc Therapy - Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (VMAT-IMRT).
METHODS: VMAT-IMRT plans of 15 AC patients were analyzed. Based on findings from new fluorescence methods we created a new volume, the expected AILD. The examined dosimetric parameters were the minimal, maximal and mean dose and V10-V50 that were delivered to the AILD, respectively.
RESULTS: The median volume of AILD was 1047 cm³. Mean Dmin, Dmax and Dmean were 7.5 Gy, 58.9 Gy and 40.8 Gy for AILD. The clinical relevant dose of 30.0 Gray covered in mean 76% of the volume of the AILD, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Only 76% of the AILD-volume received at least an expected required treatment dose of 30 Gy incidentally. Concerning the low number of loco-regional relapses in AC patients after definitive CRT one has to balance increased side effects against a rigid oncological-anatomical interpretation of the local lymphatic drainage by including the AILD into the standard CTV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29297232     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1415459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  3 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of different radiation techniques (IMRT vs. 3-dimensional) of the "true" (deep) ano-inguinal lymphatic drainage of anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Hendrik Dapper; Markus Oechsner; Christoph Hirche; Stefan Münch; Christina Sauter; Kai Borm; Jan C Peeken; Stephanie E Combs; Daniel Habermehl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Dosimetric comparison of organs at risk using different contouring guidelines for definition of the clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Authors:  Hendrik Dapper; Markus Oechsner; Stefan Münch; Christian Diehl; Jan C Peeken; Kai Borm; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Patterns of recurrence in anal cancer: a detailed analysis.

Authors:  Martin P Nilsson; Erik D Nilsson; Anders Johnsson; Otilia Leon; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Jonas Scherman
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.