Meng-Ting Wang1, Jun-Ting Liou2, Chen Wei Lin1, Chen-Liang Tsai3, Yun-Han Wang1, Yu-Juei Hsu4,5, Jyun-Heng Lai1. 1. School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. 2. Division of Cardiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. 3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. 4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. 5. Graduate Institutes of Medical Sciences and Biochemistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Abstract
Importance: The associations between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or long-acting antimuscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are greatly debated. Pivotal and relevant randomized clinical trials included prior LABA or LAMA users and excluded patients with baseline CVD; therefore, cardiovascular events arising from first-time LABA or LAMA use, if any, could not be observed. There is an urgent need to examine whether new use of and duration since initiating LABAs and LAMAs could act as important determinants of cardiovascular events. Objective: To investigate risk of CVD associated with LABAs and LAMAs, focusing on the initiation and duration of LABA and LAMA therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study included 284 220 LABA-LAMA-naïve patients with COPD at least 40 years old (mean age, 71.4 years; 68.9% men), retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for health care claims from 2007 to 2011. Exposure: LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the event or index date, stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment, new and prevalent users, concomitant COPD medications, and individual agents. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cases with inpatient or emergency care visits for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia were identified and individually matched to 4 randomly selected controls. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to estimate odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. Results: During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37 719 patients with CVD (mean age, 75.6 years; 71.6% men) and 146 139 matched controls (mean age, 75.2 years; 70.1% men) were identified. New LABA and LAMA use in COPD was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% CI, 1.35-1.67; P < .001) and a 1.52-fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P < .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, respectively, whereas the risk was absent, or even reduced with prevalent use. Individual LABA agents, LAMA dosage forms, and concomitant COPD regimens did not differ in the CVD risks. The risk persisted in an alternative case-crossover study and remained across subgroups without CVD history or prior exacerbations. Conclusions and Relevance: New initiation of LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with an approximate 1.5-fold increased severe cardiovascular risk, irrespective of prior CVD status and history of exacerbations.
Importance: The associations between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or long-acting antimuscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are greatly debated. Pivotal and relevant randomized clinical trials included prior LABA or LAMA users and excluded patients with baseline CVD; therefore, cardiovascular events arising from first-time LABA or LAMA use, if any, could not be observed. There is an urgent need to examine whether new use of and duration since initiating LABAs and LAMAs could act as important determinants of cardiovascular events. Objective: To investigate risk of CVD associated with LABAs and LAMAs, focusing on the initiation and duration of LABA and LAMA therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study included 284 220 LABA-LAMA-naïve patients with COPD at least 40 years old (mean age, 71.4 years; 68.9% men), retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for health care claims from 2007 to 2011. Exposure: LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the event or index date, stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment, new and prevalent users, concomitant COPD medications, and individual agents. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cases with inpatient or emergency care visits for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia were identified and individually matched to 4 randomly selected controls. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to estimate odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. Results: During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37 719 patients with CVD (mean age, 75.6 years; 71.6% men) and 146 139 matched controls (mean age, 75.2 years; 70.1% men) were identified. New LABA and LAMA use in COPD was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% CI, 1.35-1.67; P < .001) and a 1.52-fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P < .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, respectively, whereas the risk was absent, or even reduced with prevalent use. Individual LABA agents, LAMA dosage forms, and concomitant COPD regimens did not differ in the CVD risks. The risk persisted in an alternative case-crossover study and remained across subgroups without CVD history or prior exacerbations. Conclusions and Relevance: New initiation of LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with an approximate 1.5-fold increased severe cardiovascular risk, irrespective of prior CVD status and history of exacerbations.
Authors: M R Bristow; R Ginsburg; V Umans; M Fowler; W Minobe; R Rasmussen; P Zera; R Menlove; P Shah; S Jamieson Journal: Circ Res Date: 1986-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Andrea Gershon; Ruth Croxford; Andrew Calzavara; Teresa To; Matthew B Stanbrook; Ross Upshur; Thérèse A Stukel Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Robert A Wise; Kenneth R Chapman; Benjamin M Scirica; Deepak L Bhatt; Sami Z Daoud; Sofia Zetterstrand; Colin Reisner; Esther Garcia Gil Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicola C Day; Subramanya Kumar; Gerard Criner; Mark Dransfield; David M G Halpin; MeiLan K Han; C Elaine Jones; Morrys C Kaisermann; Sally Kilbride; Peter Lange; David A Lomas; Neil Martin; Fernando J Martinez; Dave Singh; Robert Wise; David A Lipson Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-06-05
Authors: Lei Wang; Charlotte E Pelgrim; Daniël H Swart; Guido Krenning; Adrianus C van der Graaf; Aletta D Kraneveld; Thea Leusink-Muis; Ingrid van Ark; Johan Garssen; Gert Folkerts; Saskia Braber Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Diego J Maselli; Megan Hardin; Stephanie A Christenson; Nicola A Hanania; Craig P Hersh; Sandra G Adams; Antonio Anzueto; Jay I Peters; MeiLan K Han; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Chest Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 10.262