| Literature DB >> 29296569 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a growing trend for patients to seek the least invasive treatments with less risk of complications and downtime for facial rejuvenation. Thread embedding acupuncture has become popular as a minimally invasive treatment. However, there is little clinical evidence in the literature regarding its effects.Entities:
Keywords: polydioxanone; rejuvenation; rhytidoplasty; skin aging; thread embedding acupuncture
Year: 2017 PMID: 29296569 PMCID: PMC5741386 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2017.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Specification of thread embedding acupunctures used in this study.
| Thread | Needle | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material | Shape | USP | Length (mm) | Gauge | Length (mm) |
| Polydioxanone | Bidirectional cogs | 4–0 | 110 | 23 | 60 |
| Screw | 5–0 | 70 | 27 | 50 | |
| Mono | 5–0 | 30 | 27 | 30 | |
| Mono | 5-0 | 50 | 27 | 40 | |
| Mono | 5-0 | 70 | 27 | 50 | |
USP, United State Pharmacopeia.
Fig. 1The shape of TEA.
(A) Bidirectional cog-shaped TEA. (B) Screw-shaped TEA. (C) Mono-shaped TEA.
TEA, thread embedding acupuncture.
Fig. 2Correcting jowls. (A). (B). (C).
TEA, thread embedding acupuncture.
Fig. 3Correcting nasolabial folds. (A). (B).
Fig. 4Correcting (A) mid and lower face sagging and (B) under eye sagging.
Fig. 5Primary outcome measurement. Marking the key points (A) before and (B) after the procedure. (C) Overlapping two pictures to determine picture size and the changes. Calculating distances between the points (D) before and (E) after the procedure.
Changes of jowl to subnasale vertical distance.
| Before TEA | 1 wk after TEA | Mean difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left (mm) | 147.84 ± 12.05 | 145.97 ± 11.98 | 1.87 ± 7.44 | 0.364 |
| Right (mm) | 151.56 ± 11.25 | 150.13 ± 8.92 | 1.43 ± 7.48 | 0.487 |
Data are means ± SD, using paired-sample T test.
SD, standard deviation; TEA, thread embedding acupuncture.
Changes of facial lines and folds.
| Before TEA | 1 wk after TEA | Mean difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lt infraeye line (mm) | 86.88 ± 28.57 | 76.50 ± 23.81 | 10.37 ± 20.91 | –1.961 | 0.050 |
| Rt infraeye line (mm) | 73.51 ± 25.18 | 74.63 ± 17.04 | –1.12 ± 21.20 | –0.235 | 0.814 |
| Lt ML fold (mm) | 88.97 ± 52.89 | 71.89 ± 52.77 | 17.08 ± 33.87 | −2.666 | 0.008 |
| Rt ML fold (mm) | 75.10 ± 52.36 | 63.95 ± 44.98 | 11.15 ± 17.48 | –2.521 | 0.012 |
| Lt NL fold (mm) | 109.91 ± 30.85 | 101.77 ± 31.65 | 8.14 ± 10.64 | –2.981 | 0.003 |
| Rt NL fold (mm) | 94.74 ± 37.25 | 81.29 ± 35.52 | 13.45 ± 17.15 | –2.824 | 0.005 |
| Lt Marionette line (mm) | 18.82 ± 16.54 | 16.21 ± 15.03 | 2.61 ± 4.81 | –1.955 | 0.051 |
| Rt Marionette line (mm) | 14.00 ± 10.89 | 10.75 ± 6.95 | 3.25 ± 7.22 | –1.836 | 0.066 |
Data are means ± SD, using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Lt, left; Rt, right; ML, melolabial; NL, nasolabial; SD, standard deviation; TEA, thread embedding acupuncture.
p < 0.05.
Changes in the Alexiades–Armenakas laxity scale.
| Before TEA | 1 wk after TEA | Mean difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexiades–Armenakas laxity scale | 2.89 ± 0.21 | 2.63 ± 0.27 | 0.27 ± 0.27 | –2.72 | 0.007 |
Data are means ± SD, using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
SD, standard deviation; TEA, thread embedding acupuncture.
p < 0.05.
Fig. 6Result of the global aesthetic improvement scale.
Changes of self-assessment of facial wrinkles and laxity (vas).
| Before TEA | 1 wk after TEA | Mean difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facial laxity | 5.86 ± 1.46 | 4.00 ± 2.04 | 1.86 ± 1.23 | –3.220 | 0.001* |
| Facial wrinkles | 5.79 ± 2.15 | 4.07 ± 1.98 | 1.71 ± 1.33 | –3.269 | 0.001* |