Literature DB >> 29296374

Early PET/CT scans for assessing treatment responses of non-small cell lung cancer for SBRT boost: what to do with scans from multiple scanners.

Ronald C McGarry1, Jonathan Feddock1, Partha Sinha2, Gary Conrad2, Brent J Shelton3, Li Chen3, Susanne M Arnold4, John Rinehart4.   

Abstract

Chemoradiation remains the standard of care for the nonsurgical treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but local recurrence rates of 30-40% are documented. We examined the early PET/CT responses of NSCLC treated with standard chemoradiation in a prospective single institutional trial of early 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to help define patients appropriate for dose escalation with SBRT. 48 patients with stage IIA, IIB or IIIA-B NSCLC with no or non-bulky (</= 3.0 cm) lymphadenopathy were included. Approximately one month following chemoradiation, PET-CT was performed to assess responses. Since many patients came from outside facilities, the ability to directly compare pre- and post therapy PET/CT SUV values is compromised. Thus, patients had their pre- and post-chemoradiation PET/CT SUV's assessed where possible, but also reviewed in a blinded manner by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians who scored the results on a subjective scale of FDG uptake to assess treatment responses. A high level of agreement was found between the reading nuclear medicine physicians: 0.76 (95% CI of 0.6 to 0.92). Disease progression occurred in 16% of scans including new metastatic or regional failures. 77% of patients had significant improvement in FDG uptake in the primary tumor but only 4.2% had complete resolution. Mediastinal adenopathy had resolved or significantly improved in 90%. This good, but not complete reduction of FDG uptake in the primary tumor suggests that it may be an appropriate target for local intensified radiation boost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET scan; chemoradiation; lung cancer; response to treatment

Year:  2013        PMID: 29296374      PMCID: PMC5658842     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT


  12 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Adams; Timothy G Turkington; Joshua M Wilson; Terence Z Wong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  SUV: from silly useless value to smart uptake value.

Authors:  Eric P Visser; Otto C Boerman; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Agathe Edet-Sanson; Bernard Dubray; Kaya Doyeux; Adeline Back; Sebastien Hapdey; Romain Modzelewski; Pierre Bohn; Isabelle Gardin; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Mitchell Machtay; Rebecca Paulus; Jennifer Moughan; Ritsuko Komaki; J Effrey Bradley; Hak Choy; Kathy Albain; Benjamin Movsas; William T Sause; Walter J Curran
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Restaging patients with N2 (stage IIIa) non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Robert James Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant; Buddhiwardhan Ojha
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value?

Authors:  J W Keyes
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Susanne Martina Eschmann; Godehard Friedel; Frank Paulsen; Matthias Reimold; Thomas Hehr; Wilfried Budach; Heinz-Jakob Langen; Roland Bares
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients.

Authors:  T Le Chevalier; R Arriagada; E Quoix; P Ruffie; M Martin; M Tarayre; M J Lacombe-Terrier; J Y Douillard; A Laplanche
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-03-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prognostic value of serial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Hua-qi Zhang; Jin-ming Yu; Xue Meng; Jin-bo Yue; Rui Feng; Li Ma
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  When is it best to repeat a 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan on patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Robert James Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.