| Literature DB >> 29296070 |
Hung-Yu Lin1,2,3,4, Yong-Syuan Chen5, Kai Wang1,6,7, Hsiang-Wen Chien1,6,7, Yi-Hsien Hsieh5,8,9, Shun-Fa Yang1,10.
Abstract
Purpose: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) can result in abnormal migration of RPE cells. Fisetin is a naturally occurring compound that has been reported to have antitumor effects, but its effects on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced cell migration and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29296070 PMCID: PMC5741382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Effects of fisetin on EGF in terms of cell viability and migration of ARPE-19 cells. A: ARPE-19 cells were treated with different concentrations of fisetin for 24 h and were tested with the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. B: ARPE-19 cells were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/ml) or were cotreated with EGF (20 ng/ml) plus different concentrations of fisetin (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 24 h before analysis with the MTT assay. C: In vitro determination of cell migration. D: Microscopy images of ARPE-19 cell migration after scratch (time 0) and after 12 h of EGF, EGF (100 ng/ml) or EGF (100 ng/ml) plus different fisetin (5 and 10 μM) treatments. Quantification of migrating cells is shown as a histogram. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with control cells.
Figure 2Effects of treatment with fisetin in EGF-induced MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in ARPE-19 cells. A: Western blotting for the protein of matrix metallopeptidase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 in epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/ml) or following treatment with EGF (20 ng/ml) plus fisetin (5 and 10 μM) for 24 h. B: Quantitative analysis of western blots. C: Reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA expression. D: Quantitative analysis of RT–PCR. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as internal control. **p<0.01 compared with control cells; #p<0.01 compared with fisetin.
Figure 3Effects of treatment with either fisetin or LY294002 on EGF-induced AKT activation in ARPE-19 cells. A: ARPE-19 cells were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/ml) or were cotreated with EGF (20 ng/ml) plus fisetin (5 μM) plus LY294002 (30 μM) for 24 h; western blots show p-AKT, t-AKT, and matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9) expression. The reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) assay shows MMP-9 mRNA expression. B: The migratory abilities of cells were determined using an in vitro migration assay. Quantification of migrated cells is shown as a histogram. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as an internal control. **p<0.01 compared with control cells; #p<0.01 compared with fisetin.
Figure 4Fisetin inhibits the EGF-induced transcriptional activity of MMP-9 by decreasing the DNA-binding activity of Sp1 on the matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9) promoter in ARPE-19 cells. ARPE-19 cells were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/ml) or were treated with EGF (20 ng/ml) plus fisetin (5 and 10 μM) for 24 h. A: Schematic of the transcription-factor binding regions on the human MMP-2 and MMP-9 promoter. B: Luciferase assay analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 transcription activity. C–E: Schematic representation of reporter plasmids of Sp1, NF-κB, and AP1 promoters (left to right) and responsive elements (upper portion). ARPE-19 cells were transiently transfected with reporter plasmids of Sp1, NF-κB, and AP1 promoters and were treated with fisetin for 2 h with or without EGF for 24 h. F: Schematic presentation of the MMP-9 promoter Sp1 mutant plasmid (shown at the top) and the luciferase activity of MMP-9. G: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis of the Sp1 binding to the MMP-9 promoter region treated with fisetin for 2 h with or without EGF for 24 h in ARPE-19 cells. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with control cells; #p<0.01 compared with fisetin.
Figure 5Effects of fisetin on EGF-induced the expression of AKT and Sp1 in ARPE-19 cells. A: Western blotting of the nuclear fraction of Sp1 in epidermal growth factor (EGF; 20 ng/ml) or treated with EGF (20 ng/ml) plus fisetin (5 and 10 μM) for 24 h. B: Quantitative analysis of western blots. C: Western blotting for the expression of p-AKT, AKT, and Sp1. D: Sp1 activity was detected with the luciferase assay. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. **p<0.01 compared with control cells; #p<0.01 compared with fisetin.
Figure 6A model describing the molecular mechanisms by which fisetin suppresses EGF-induced ARPE-19 cell migration. Fisetin could inhibit EGF induced the phosphorylation of AKT, thereby inhibited the EGF-induced Sp1 translocation and MMP-9 transcription activity, and further reduced migration of ARPE-19 cells.