Literature DB >> 29295797

Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.

Murat Ulu1, Emrah Soylu2, Seyfi Kelebek3, Serkan Dikici4, Hakan Oflaz4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is one of the most popular surgical procedures for correction of mandibular deformities. Several clinical and biomechanical studies exist in the literature which, comparing the stability of different osteosynthesis materials and techniques, were performed using two or three-point biomechanical test models. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of biodegradable and titanium materials for SSRO on one-piece polyurethane mandible samples which were fixed in a novel designed 6-point testing unit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 16 polyurethane one piece replicas of human mandibles were used and bilateral SSRO were performed by the manufacturer according to Dal Pont modification. Mandibles were fixed with titanium and PLLA/PGA fixation materials. Displacement amounts were measured under loading forces using a non-contact extensometer, and strain values at the screws were recorded by strain gauges.
RESULTS: Bicortical titanium screws (Group 2) showed significantly lower displacement values, while bicortical PLLA/PGA screws (group 4) showed significantly higher displacement values at 40-360 N forces. (p < 0.05). The highest strain value was measured on screws that were inserted upright in a proximal segment near the osteotomy line.
CONCLUSION: To achieve more realistic results in biomechanical studies, test models should imitate jaw movements and test environments should be as similar as possible to physiological conditions. Newly designed six-point testing units will contribute to future biomechanical studies.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical test; Polyurethane mandibles; Rigid internal fixation; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Testing unit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29295797     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  2 in total

1.  Which type of method shows the best mechanical behavior for internal fixation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements with clockwise rotation? Comparison of four methods.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Mattos de Carvalho; Soraya da Silva Oliveira; Matheus Favaro; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Soraya da Silva Oliveira; Pedro Henrique Mattos de Carvalho; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.