| Literature DB >> 29295525 |
Marilyn García-Tenesaca1, Eillen S Navarrete2, Gabriel A Iturralde3, Irina M Villacrés Granda4, Eduardo Tejera5, Pablo Beltrán-Ayala6, Francesca Giampieri7, Maurizio Battino8, José M Alvarez-Suarez9.
Abstract
Three types of monofloral honey from the Andean regions of Ecuador (Avocado, Eucalyptus, and Rapeseed honey) were analyzed to determine their floral origin, physicochemical parameters, chemical composition, antioxidant capacity, and their capacity to reduce in vitro bacterial biofilms. The chemical composition varied considerably depending on floral origin. The highest values of bioactive compounds were found in Avocado honey, classified as dark amber in color, while the lowest values were found in Eucalyptus honey followed by Rapeseed honey, both classified as extra light amber. When compared to Eucalyptus and Rapeseed honey, Avocado honey showed a more effective superoxide scavenging activity, chelating metal ions capacity, and a higher ability to protect human erythrocyte membranes against lipid peroxidation. For antimicrobial activity, the hydrogen peroxide content and the capacity to inhibit the biofilm formation, and to remove preformed biofilm from Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae was determined. Avocado honey showed the highest values of hydrogen peroxide content, as well as the highest capacity to reduce in vitro bacterial biofilms. A correlation between color vs. phenolics content vs. superoxide scavenging activity vs. chelating metal ions capacity, and the capacity to protect human erythrocyte membranes against lipid peroxidation was found.Entities:
Keywords: Ecuadorian monofloral honey; Eucalyptus honey; Rapeseed honey; avocado honey
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29295525 PMCID: PMC5795995 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Physicochemical parameters, bioactive compound and total antioxidant capacity in monofloral honeys from Ecuador.
| Parameters | Monofloral Honey Types/Values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Avocado Honey | Eucalyptus Honey | Rapeseed Honey | |
| Colour (mm Pfund) | 137.29 ± 66.97 a | 39.87 ± 11.46 b | 37.09 ±3.32 b |
| Moisture (%) | 16.42 ± 2.53 a | 18.62 ± 1.84 b | 14.63 ± 2.74 c |
| pH | 5.23 ± 0.96 a | 4.01 ± 0.18 b | 3.96 ± 0.24 b |
| Hydroxymethylfurfural (mg/kg of honey) | 27.16 ± 30.43 a | 3.78 ± 3.48 b | 70.81 ± 7.86 c |
| Diastase index (ºGothe) | 47.65 ± 34.95 a | 32.92 ± 11.35 b | 13.71 ± 2.99 c |
| Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) | 1.31 ± 0.47 a | 0.39 ± 0.03 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 c |
| Ash content (%) | 1.05 ± 0.13 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 b | 0.11 ± 0.01 c |
| Total phenolic content (mg GAE/100 g of honey) | 68.23 ± 5.79 a | 47.71 ± 1.71 b | 34.33 ± 0.895 c |
| Total flavonoid content (mg CEq/100 g of honey) | 4.25 ± 1.22 a | 1.09 ± 0.24 b | 0.72 ± 0.20 c |
| Total carotenoids content (mg | 2.24 ± 0.67 a | 1.60 ± 0.33 b | 0.76 ± 0.14 c |
| Total free amino acids content (mg LE/100 g of honey) | 83.46 ± 43.41 a | 14.07 ± 3.20 b | 10.53 ± 3.66 c |
| Total proline content (mg Prol/100 g of honey) | 1039.94 ± 53.31 a | 140.82 ± 40.71 b | 88.19 ± 18.53 c |
| FRAP (μmol TE/100 g of honey) | 425.35 ± 49.24 a | 142.97 ± 13.84 b | 92.05 ± 4.30 c |
| DPPH (μmol TE/100 g of honey) | 84.05 ± 5.16 a | 44.30 ± 5.33 b | 18.22 ± 3.19 c |
| O2•− Scavenging activity IC50 (mg/mL) | 1.82 ± 0.32 a | 4.90 ± 0.84 b | 8.42 ± 1.72 |
| Chelating metal ions capacity (%) | 76.90 ± 7.08 a | 26. 17 ± 6.92 b | 13.69 ± 2.35 c |
| TBARS assay IC50 (mg/mL) | 7.59 ± 1.85 a | 17.78 ± 3.97 b | 24.40 ± 4.98 c |
Sample was analyzed in triplicate and data are presented as means ± standard deviation. a,b,c represent significant difference for p < 0.05. GAE, Gallic Acid Equivalents; CEq, Catechin Equivalents; βcarotE, β-carotene Equivalents; LE, L-leucine Equivalents; Prol, Proline; FRAP, Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power; O2•−, RSA, Superoxide Radical Scavenging Activity; TBARS, Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances; TE, Trolox equivalents; DPPH, DPPH radical scavenging activity.
Correlation matrix for quantitative determinations in the three monofloral honeys.
| Variables | Colour | TPC | TFC | TCC | FRAP | DPPH RSA | O2•− RSA | MICheC | TBARS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 0.770 ** | 0.860 ** | 0.378 * | 0.787 ** | 0.729 ** | −0.613 ** | 0.716 ** | −0.699 ** | |
| - | - | 0.905 ** | 0.688 ** | 0.937 ** | 0.958 ** | −0.890 ** | 0.921 ** | −0.880 ** | |
| - | - | - | 0.625 ** | 0.899 ** | 0.820 ** | −0.734 ** | 0.845 ** | −0.782 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | 0.572 ** | 0.609 ** | −0.596 ** | 0.481 ** | −0.481 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | - | 0.932 ** | −0.827 ** | 0.943 ** | −0.847 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.899 ** | 0.944 ** | −0.884 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.837 ** | 0.840 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.869 ** | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Except in the diagonal, the values at the level of significance are reported. TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; TCC, total carotenoids content; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power assay, DPPH RSA, DPPH radical scavenging activity; O2•− RSA, superoxide anion radical scavenging activity, MICheC, metal ions chelating capacity. * Significant at p < 0.05; ** Significant at p > 0.01.
Figure 1Box-plot diagrams of the levels of quantitative determinations in the three monofloral honeys. TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; TCC, total carotenoids content; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power assay, DPPH RSA, DPPH radical scavenging activity; O2•− RSA, superoxide anion radical scavenging activity, MICheC, metal ions chelating capacity.
Figure 2H2O2 values of the three monofloral honeys studied. Columns belonging to the same set of data with different symbols are significantly different. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Effectiveness of the three monofloral honeys in inhibiting biofilm formation (A) and removing preformed biofilm (B) in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria. Columns belonging to the same set of data with different symbols are significantly different when compared to control (Medium 0% Honey). * p < 0.05, # p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01.