Literature DB >> 29294732

Individual Versus Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Partner-Violent Men: A Preliminary Randomized Trial.

Christopher M Murphy1, Christopher I Eckhardt2, Judith M Clifford1, Adam D LaMotte1, Laura A Meis3,4.   

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial tested the hypothesis that a flexible, case formulation-based, individual treatment approach integrating motivational interviewing strategies with cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) is more efficacious than a standardized group cognitive-behavioral approach (GCBT) for perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). Forty-two men presenting for services at a community domestic violence agency were randomized to receive 20 sessions of ICBT or a 20-week group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program. Participants and their relationship partners completed assessments of relationship abuse and relationship functioning at baseline and quarterly follow-ups for 1 year. Treatment uptake and session attendance were significantly higher in ICBT than GCBT. However, contrary to the study hypothesis, GCBT produced consistently equivalent or greater benefits than ICBT. Participant self-reports revealed significant reductions in abusive behavior and injuries across conditions with no differential benefits between conditions. Victim partner reports revealed more favorable outcomes for group treatment, including a statistically significant difference in psychological aggression, and differences exceeding a medium effect size for physical assault, emotional abuse, and partner relationship adjustment. In response to hypothetical relationship scenarios, GCBT was associated with greater reductions than ICBT (exceeding a medium effect) in articulated cognitive distortions and aggressive intentions. Treatment competence ratings suggest that flexible, individualized administration of CBT creates challenges in session agenda setting, homework implementation, and formal aspects of relationship skills training. Although caution is needed in generalizing findings from this small-scale trial, the results suggest that the mutual support and positive social influence available in group intervention may be particularly helpful for IPV perpetrators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  batterers; domestic violence; intervention/treatment; violent offenders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29294732     DOI: 10.1177/0886260517705666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  4 in total

1.  Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Günnur Karakurt; Esin Koç; Ezgi Elif Çetinsaya; Zozan Ayluçtarhan; Shari Bolen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Cognitive Flexibility and Reaction Time Improvements After Cognitive Training Designed for Men Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Á Romero-Martínez; F Santirso; M Lila; J Comes-Fayos; L Moya-Albiol
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2021-08-05

3.  Cognitive behavioural group therapy for male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Merete Berg Nesset; Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera; Therese Kristine Dalsbø; Sindre Andre Pedersen; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Tom Palmstierna
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Cognitive behavioural group therapy versus mindfulness-based stress reduction group therapy for intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Merete Berg Nesset; Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Richard Whittington; Tom Palmstierna
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.