Literature DB >> 29294014

Patients with right bundle branch block and concomitant delayed left ventricular activation respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Gianni Pastore1, Giovanni Morani2, Massimiliano Maines3, Lina Marcantoni1, Bruna Bolzan2, Francesco Zanon1, Franco Noventa4, Giorgio Corbucci5, Enrico Baracca1, Claudio Picariello1, Daniela Lanza1, Marco Zuin1, Loris Roncon1, S Serge Barold6.   

Abstract

Aims: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) typically presents with only delayed right ventricular activation. However, some patients with RBBB develop concomitant delayed left ventricular (LV) activation. Such patients may show a specific electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern resembling RBBB in the precordial leads in association with an insignificant S-wave in lateral limb leads (atypical RBBB). We therefore postulated that the ECG pattern of atypical RBBB might be able to identify a subgroup of patients likely to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of RBBB ECG morphology on CRT response in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results: We evaluated the echocardiographic clinical response of 66 patients with RBBB treated with CRT and followed up for almost 2 years. The patients were divided electrocardiographically into 2 groups: 31 with typical RBBB and 35 with atypical RBBB. Responders were classified in terms of reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (ESVi) ≥ 15% or reduction in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class ≥ 1 or Packer score variation (NYHA response with no HF-related hospitalization events or death). The atypical RBBB group presented a longer LV activation time compared with the typical RBBB group (111.9 ± 17.6 vs. 73.2 ± 15.4 ms; P < 0.001). In the atypical and typical RBBB groups, respectively, 71.4% and 19.4% of patients were ESVi responders (P = 0.001) 74.3% and 32.3% were NYHA responders (P = 0.002); similarly, 71.4% and 29.0% of patients exhibited a 2-year Packer score of 0 (P = 0.002).
Conclusion: Patients with atypical RBBB, which is a pattern highly suggestive of concomitant delayed LV conduction, may show a satisfactory response to CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29294014     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

1.  Vectorcardiography-derived index allows a robust quantification of ventricular electrical synchrony.

Authors:  Juan M F Fernández; Damián N Spagnuolo; María T Politi; Iván A Tello Santacruz; Miguel Schiavone; César Cáceres Monié; Horacio A Avaca; Osvaldo Chara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Risk factors for ventricular tachyarrhythmic events in patients without left bundle branch block who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Arwa Younis; Mehmet K Aktas; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Valentina Kutyifa; Ilan Goldenberg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy for electrical dyssynchrony with a narrow QRS duration and left anterior hemiblock.

Authors:  Michio Ogano; Ippei Tsuboi; Jun Tanabe
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-09-15

4.  Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria that may improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gábor Katona; András Vereckei
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mohammed A Ghossein; Antonius Mw van Stipdonk; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  A different cardiac resynchronization therapy technique might be needed in some patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern.

Authors:  Gábor Katona; Zsuzsanna Szelényi; Gábor Szénási; Bálint Kozman; Zsolt Rekvényi; Luca Kópházi; Zsolt Dobos; Szilvia Vereckei; András Vereckei
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Comparison between conduction system pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block patients.

Authors:  Marina Strocchi; Karli Gillette; Aurel Neic; Mark K Elliott; Nadeev Wijesuriya; Vishal Mehta; Edward J Vigmond; Gernot Plank; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  Indications of Cardiac Resynchronization in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block: Clinical Review of Available Evidence.

Authors:  Maged Henin; Hany Ragy; James Mannion; Santhosh David; Beshoy Refila; Usama Boles
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2020-01-26

9.  Left Ventricular Contraction Sequence in a Case Where the QRS Changed from Left to Atypical Right Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hara; Takako Nagata; Hiroshi Ito; Shinichi Niwano; Junya Ako
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2020-11-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.