Literature DB >> 29293970

Totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis: short-term clinical and oncological outcomes.

M Elshaer1, G Gravante2, C-B Tang1, N V Jayanthi1.   

Abstract

Several esophageal resection techniques have been reported in literature. The objective of this study is to assess postoperative and oncological outcomes of two-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a prone position using thoracoscopic hand-sewn anastomosis. Consecutive patients who underwent two-stage MIE in 2016 performed by the senior author were included. This was compared with the preceding cohort of consecutive patients who underwent two-stage hybrid esophagectomy (HE). The primary outcome was 30-day morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were operation duration, length of stay (LOS), total nodes examined (TNE), number of positive nodes (NPN), and resection margin. Overall, 15 patients underwent MIE and 11 patients underwent HE. Respiratory complications occurred in three (20.0%) patients in the MIE group and in five (45.5%) patients in the HE group (P = 0.218). Cardiac complications occurred in two (18.2%) patients, and two other patients (18.2%) experienced anastomotic leak in the HE group. Mean operative duration was 349 ± 41.6 min in MIE and 309 ± 47.8 min in HE (P = 0.040). Median LOS was 10 days (range: 7-70) in MIE and 13 days (range: 10-116) in HE (P = 0.045). Median TNE was 23 (range: 12-36) in MIE and 20 (range: 14-47) in HE (P = 0.775). Longitudinal margin was involved in one patient (9.1%) in HE and no longitudinal margin was involved in the MIE group. Circumferential resection margin was involved in seven patients (46.7%) in MIE and in four patients (36.4%) in HE (P = 0.391). Two-stage MIE using hand-sewn technique is safe and feasible without compromising surgical and oncological outcomes. A multicenter large trial is recommended to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29293970     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  4 in total

1.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Totally Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Min Gu; Han-Lu Zhang; Yu-Shang Yang; Yong Yuan; Yang Hu; Guo-Wei Che; Long-Qi Chen; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.

Authors:  Krashna Patel; Alan Askari; Omar Abbassi; Naga Venkatesh Jayanthi; Oliver Claydon; James Laycock; Aravindh Ramalingam; Bhaskar Kumar; Joshua Wong; Mohamed Aly; Periyathambi Jambulingam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Bastiaan R Klarenbeek; Nikolaj Baranov; Maroeska M Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with pathologic node-positive esophageal cancer following radical resection is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maohui Chen; Cheng Chen; Jiazhou Xiao; Bingqiang Cai; Shuliang Zhang; Mingqiang Liang; Taidui Zeng; Hao Chen; Weidong Wu; Guobing Xu; Wei Zheng; Yong Zhu; Chun Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.