Literature DB >> 29293774

TRIENNIAL LACTATION SYMPOSIUM/BOLFA: Mammary growth during pregnancy and lactation and its relationship with milk yield.

S R Davis.   

Abstract

The number of secretory cells in the mammary gland is often cited as a major determinant of milk production. However, literature data for proxy measures of secretory cell number do not fully support such a claim. In particular, measurements of total mammary DNA in livestock explain only <25% of variation in milk yield, probably because of tissue heterogeneity for DNA concentration. Relative to BW, measurements of udder size in dairy cattle, as total DNA or udder weight, are approximately double those seen in most other livestock classes. Therefore, selection for dairy production, not surprisingly, has resulted in cows with greater secretory capacity. There is limited evidence that genetic selection is still increasing udder size in some cattle populations, but more recent data are needed. It is contended that the most important period of mammary growth for determination of milk yield is that occurring in pregnancy and early lactation. Mammary development is largely complete, at term, in sheep, goats, and cattle, but in pigs, the udder continues to grow during the first 3 wk of lactation, depending, in part, on litter size. Increased litter size in sheep and goats will enhance the extent of mammary development at the end of gestation (and milk yield) by 20 to 25%. However, twinning in dairy cattle does not affect milk production and, by inference only, is not likely to affect numbers of secretory cells at term. Milking frequency and suckling intensity in very early lactation will increase milk yield in cows and increase mammogenesis and milk yield in sheep, indicating that even at term, the ruminant gland retains some capacity for further development, if demand requires it. There is limited understanding of the hormonal signals in pregnancy that regulate mammary development relative to the number of young carried. Furthermore, the genetic differences between dairy and beef cattle that lead to substantially greater udder size in the dairy breeds have not been identified. During lactation, the drivers for secretory cell loss in relation to milking frequency and nutritional status are still not known. Measurement of mammary development and using this phenotype in genomewide association studies to identify key genetic variants for mammogenesis will provide knowledge that is fundamental to understanding the quantitative regulation of milk production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29293774      PMCID: PMC6292317          DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  69 in total

1.  Changes in tissue composition associated with mammary gland growth during lactation in sows.

Authors:  S W Kim; W L Hurley; I K Han; R A Easter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Regulation of mammary gland growth and morphogenesis by the mammary fat pad: a species comparison.

Authors:  R C Hovey; T B McFadden; R M Akers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  High body weight gain and reduced bovine mammary growth: physiological basis and implications for milk yield potential.

Authors:  K Sejrsen; S Purup; M Vestergaard; J Foldager
Journal:  Domest Anim Endocrinol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 4.  Windows in early mammary development: critical or not?

Authors:  C H Knight; A Sorensen
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Mammary gland growth in sheep.

Authors:  R R Anderson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Inhibition of prolactin in the last trimester of gestation decreases mammary gland development in gilts.

Authors:  C Farmer; M T Sorensen; D Petitclerc
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint.

Authors:  L B Hansen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Production responses to bovine somatotropin in northeast dairy herds.

Authors:  D E Bauman; R W Everett; W H Weiland; R J Collier
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST.

Authors:  A V Capuco; D L Wood; R Baldwin; K Mcleod; M J Paape
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Technical note: Calibration of a simple udder volume measurement technique.

Authors:  H Magaña-Sevilla; C A Sandoval-Castro
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  2 in total

1.  TRIENNIAL LACTATION BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM/BOLFA: The biology of lactation- from genes to cells to milk.

Authors:  C Farmer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Animal Models for In Vivo Lactation Studies: Anatomy, Physiology and Milk Compositions in the Most Used Non-Clinical Species: A Contribution from the ConcePTION Project.

Authors:  Domenico Ventrella; Nurit Ashkenazi; Alberto Elmi; Karel Allegaert; Camilla Aniballi; Anthony DeLise; Patrick John Devine; Anne Smits; Lilach Steiner; Monica Forni; Michele Bouisset-Leonard; Maria Laura Bacci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.