Literature DB >> 29293737

Two split-time artificial insemination programs in suckled beef cows.

J S Stevenson, S L Hill, D M Grieger, K C Olson, J R Jaeger, J Ahola, G E Seidel, R K Kasimanickam.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine which of 2 split-time AI programs applied to suckled beef cows would result in greater pregnancy risk. Suckled beef cows (n = 1,062) at 12 locations in 4 states (CO, KS, MY, and WA) were enrolled. Cows were treated on d -7 with a progesterone insert concurrent with 100 µg GnRH and on d 0 with 25 mg PGF plus removal of the insert. Estrus-detection patches were affixed to cows at insert removal. The study was designed as a completely randomized experiment of 2 treatment combinations. Within location and balanced for parity (primiparous vs. multiparous), cows were assigned randomly to 2 treatment times (55 vs. 65 h after CIDR insert removal) at which time estrus-detection patches were assessed. Estrus was defined to have occurred when an estrus-detection patch was > 50% colored (activated). Cows determined to be in estrus were inseminated at either 55 or 65 h, whereas the residual nonestrous cows in both treatment times received GnRH at 55 or 65 h but were inseminated 20 h later at 75 or 85 h, respectively. Pregnancy outcomes were determined at 36 d after AI and at the end of the breeding season. Thus, pregnancy outcomes of interest were compared between the 55 + 75-h treatment combination and that of the 65+85-h combination. Expression of estrus was greater ( = 0.001) by 65 h after PGF than by 55 h (62.0% vs. 41.9%), respectively, and this proportion was influenced by parity (time x parity interaction; = 0.006). As a result, proportionally more ( < 0.001) cows received the timed AI at 75 than 85 h (59.4% vs. 40.6%). Similar proportions of cows not in estrus by 55 or 65 h were detected in estrus by 75 or 85 h (40.1% vs. 39.3%), respectively. The cumulative proportion of cows in estrus by 75 h was less ( < 0.001) than that by 85 h (66.7% vs. 76.7%), respectively. Pregnancy risks at 36 d differed among treatments, with cows detected in estrus and inseminated at 55 or 65 h having greater pregnancy risks than their time-inseminated herd mates at 75 or 85 h (62.3% vs.49.7%), respectively. Overall pregnancy risk for cows in the 65+85-h treatment combination was greater at 36 d than for cows in the 55 + 75-h treatment combination (61.0% vs. 51.4%), respectively. We conclude that the 65 + 85-h treatment combination produced more pregnancies than the 55 + 75-h combination, but its implementation may be somewhat less convenient in terms of cow handling times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29293737      PMCID: PMC6292279          DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Expression of estrus before fixed-time AI affects conception rates and factors that impact expression of estrus and the repeatability of expression of estrus in sequential breeding seasons.

Authors:  Brittany N Richardson; Scott L Hill; Jeffery S Stevenson; Gemechis D Djira; George A Perry
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Delayed insemination of non-estrous heifers and cows when using conventional semen in timed artificial insemination.

Authors:  J M Thomas; S E Poock; M R Ellersieck; M F Smith; D J Patterson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Split-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: III. Comparing fixed-time artificial insemination to split-time artificial insemination with delayed administration of GnRH in postpartum cows.

Authors:  B E Bishop; J M Thomas; J M Abel; S E Poock; M R Ellersieck; M F Smith; D J Patterson
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone increased pregnancy risk in suckled beef cows not detected in estrus and subjected to a split-time artificial insemination program.

Authors:  S L Hill; D M Grieger; K C Olson; J R Jaeger; C R Dahlen; M R Crosswhite; N Negrin Pereira; S R Underdahl; B W Neville; J Ahola; M C Fischer; G E Seidel; J S Stevenson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Using estrus detection patches to optimally time insemination improved pregnancy risk in suckled beef cows enrolled in a fixed-time artificial insemination program.

Authors:  S L Hill; D M Grieger; K C Olson; J R Jaeger; C R Dahlen; G A Bridges; F Dantas; J E Larson; A M Muth-Spurlock; J K Ahola; M C Fischer; G A Perry; E L Larimore; T L Steckler; W D Whittier; J F Currin; J S Stevenson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Synchronizing estrus and(or) ovulation in beef cows after combinations of GnRH, norgestomet, and prostaglandin F2alpha with or without timed insemination.

Authors:  J S Stevenson; K E Thompson; W L Forbes; G C Lamb; D M Grieger; L R Corah
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Timing of artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows following administration of the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug-release protocol.

Authors:  D C Busch; D J Schafer; D J Wilson; D A Mallory; N R Leitman; J K Haden; M R Ellersieck; M F Smith; D J Patterson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Split-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: I-Using estrous response to determine the optimal time(s) at which to administer GnRH in beef heifers and postpartum cows.

Authors:  B E Bishop; J M Thomas; J M Abel; S E Poock; M R Ellersieck; M F Smith; D J Patterson
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Synchronization and Artificial Insemination Strategies in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Graham Clifford Lamb; Vitor R G Mercadante
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Delayed insemination of nonestrous cows improves pregnancy rates when using sex-sorted semen in timed artificial insemination of suckled beef cows.

Authors:  J M Thomas; S L Lock; S E Poock; M R Ellersieck; M F Smith; D J Patterson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.159

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.