Literature DB >> 29293724

Can we improve maternal care in sows? Maternal behavioral traits important for piglet survival in loose-housed sow herds.

M Ocepek, E M Rosvold, I Andersen-Ranberg, I L Andersen.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this survey was to investigate the relationship between qualitative maternal behavioral scores (nest building activities, sow communication, and sow carefulness), piglet mortality, and the number of weaned piglets on commercial farms with loose-housed lactating (Norsvin Landrace × Yorkshire) sows. Second, the impact of these scores on productivity compared with the physical condition of sows (movement disorders, body condition, and shoulder lesions) was assessed. Data on maternal care behaviors and physical condition were collected on 895 sows from 45 commercial farms. Farmers scored sows on their physical condition (movement disorders [MD], BCS, and shoulder lesions [SL]) and qualitative maternal care behaviors (nest building activities [NEST] prior to farrowing and sow communication [COM] and sow carefulness [CARE] after farrowing, while sows were standing and moving and just before lying down). There was a low positive correlation between NEST and COM ( = 0.10, = 0.026) and between NEST and CARE ( = 0.15, = 0.010) but a high positive correlation between COM and CARE ( = 0.57, < 0.001). Higher COM and CARE were associated with lower piglet mortality ( ˂ 0.001 and = 0.013, respectively), and a greater number of weaned piglets was associated with higher scores for NEST ( = 0.009), COM ( < 0.001), and CARE ( = 0.009). Maternal care behavior had a greater impact on piglet mortality and the number of weaned piglets than sow physical condition (MD, BCS, and SL). We tested 7 different models (combinations of behavioral scores) and compared their relative predictive accuracies using Akaike information criteria. The model including COM and CARE had the best predictive accuracy for piglet mortality/weaned piglets. There was between-sow variation in maternal care behaviors (COM and CARE), and both were unaffected by litter size. Because these behaviors were also easy to score for the farmers, combining COM and CARE has the greatest potential to be tested in nucleus herds for calculation of genetic variation and heritability and should be taken into account in future breeding programs for sows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29293724      PMCID: PMC6292299          DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  3 in total

1.  Neonatal piglet traits of importance for survival in crates and indoor pens.

Authors:  L J Pedersen; P Berg; G Jørgensen; I L Andersen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.

Authors:  M Ocepek; I Andersen-Ranberg; S A Edwards; B Fredriksen; T Framstad; I L Andersen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Udder characteristics of importance for teat use in purebred and crossbred pigs.

Authors:  M Ocepek; I Andersen-Ranberg; S A Edwards; I L Andersen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.159

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Hemoglobin A1c, hemoglobin glycation index, and triglyceride and glucose index: Useful tools to predict low feed intake associated with glucose intolerance in lactating sows.

Authors:  Rosa Elena Pérez; Cyntia Michelle González; Manuel López; Katya Vargas; Gerardo Ordaz; Ruy Ortiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sow communication with piglets while being active is a good predictor of maternal skills, piglet survival and litter quality in three different breeds of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Marko Ocepek; Inger Lise Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.