Literature DB >> 29293698

A dynamic model as a tool to describe the variability of lifetime body weight trajectories in livestock females.

L Puillet, O Martin.   

Abstract

Until now, the development of precision livestock farming has been largely based on data acquisition automation. The future challenge is to develop interpretative tools to capitalize on high-throughput raw data and to generate benchmarks for phenotypic traits. We developed a dynamic model of female BW that converts BW time series into a vector of biologically meaningful parameters. The model is based on a first submodel that split a female's weight into elementary mass changes related to biological functions: growth (G component), reserves balance (R component), uterine load (U component), and maternal investment (M component). These elementary weight components are linked to the second submodel, which represents the litter developmental stages (oocyte, fetus, neonate, and juvenile) that drive elementary components of dam weight over each reproductive cycle. The so-called GRUM model is based on ordinary differential equations and laws of mass action. Input data are BW measures, age, and litter weight at birth for each parturition. Outputs of the fitting procedure are a vector of parameters related to each GRUM component and indexed by reproductive cycle. We illustrated the potential application of the model with a case study including growth and successive lactations ( = 202) from 45 dairy goats from the Alpine ( = 27) and Saanen ( = 18) breeds. The fitting procedure converged for all individuals, including goats that went through extended lactations. We analyzed the fitted parameters to quantify breed and parity effects over 4 reproductive cycles. We found significant differences between breeds regarding gestation components (fetal growth and reserves balance). We also found significant differences among reproductive cycles for reserves balance. Although these findings are based on a small sample, they illustrate how use the model can be to adapt herd management and implement grouping strategies to account for individual variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29293698      PMCID: PMC6292268          DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  On-farm estimation of energy balance in dairy cows using only frequent body weight measurements and body condition score.

Authors:  V M Thorup; D Edwards; N C Friggens
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling.

Authors:  O Martin; D Sauvant
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance.

Authors:  J E Pryce; M P Coffey; G Simm
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Advances in predicting nutrient partitioning in the dairy cow: recognizing the central role of genotype and its expression through time.

Authors:  N C Friggens; L Brun-Lafleur; P Faverdin; D Sauvant; O Martin
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prediction of body lipid change in pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  N C Friggens; K L Ingvartsen; G C Emmans
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 6.  Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare.

Authors:  J R Roche; N C Friggens; J K Kay; M W Fisher; K J Stafford; D P Berry
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; J J Crowley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Energy balance of individual cows can be estimated in real-time on farm using frequent liveweight measures even in the absence of body condition score.

Authors:  V M Thorup; S Højsgaard; M R Weisbjerg; N C Friggens
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Describing the body condition score change between successive calvings: a novel strategy generalizable to diverse cohorts.

Authors:  J R Roche; D P Berry; J M Lee; K A Macdonald; R C Boston
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  A dynamic model to predict fat and protein fluxes and dry matter intake associated with body reserve changes in cattle.

Authors:  Luis O Tedeschi; Danny G Fox; Paul J Kononoff
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of robustness in meat sheep through body weight and body condition score changes over time.

Authors:  Tiphaine Macé; Eliel González-García; Julien Pradel; Sara Parisot; Fabien Carrière; Sebastien Douls; Didier Foulquié; Dominique Hazard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.

Authors:  Hector M Menendez; Jameson R Brennan; Charlotte Gaillard; Krista Ehlert; Jaelyn Quintana; Suresh Neethirajan; Aline Remus; Marc Jacobs; Izabelle A M A Teixeira; Benjamin L Turner; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.