Literature DB >> 29293404

Quality Indicators: Measurement and Predictors in Head and Neck Cancer Free Flap Patients.

Antoine Eskander1, Stephen Y Kang2, Benjamin Tweel3, Jigar Sitapara2, Matthew Old2, Enver Ozer2, Amit Agrawal2, Ricardo Carrau2, James Rocco2, Theodoros N Teknos2.   

Abstract

Objective To determine the predictors of length of stay (LOS), readmission within 30 days, and unplanned return to the operating room (OR) within 30 days in head and neck free flap patients. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary academic cancer hospital. Subjects and Methods All head and neck free flap patients at The Ohio State University (OSU, 2006-2012) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression to assess the impact of patient factors, flap and wound factors, and intraoperative factors on the aforementioned quality metric outcomes. Results In total, 515 patients were identified, of whom 66% had oral cavity cancers, 33% had recurrent tumors, and 28% underwent primary radiotherapy. Of the patients, 31.5% had a LOS greater than 9 days, predicted by longer operative time, oral cavity and pharyngeal tumor sites, blood transfusion, diabetes mellitus, and any complication. A total of 12.6% of patients were readmitted within 30 days predicted by absent OSU preoperative assessment clinic attendance and any complication, and 14.8% of patients had an unplanned OR return predicted by advanced age. Conclusions When assessing quality metrics, adjustment for the complexity involved in managing patients with head and neck cancer with a high comorbidity index, clean contaminated wounds, and a high degree of primary radiotherapy is important. Patients seen in a preoperative assessment clinic had a lower risk of readmission postoperatively, and this should be recommended for all head and neck free flap patients. Quality improvement projects should focus on predictors and prevention of complications as this was the number one predictor of both increased length of stay and readmission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free flap; head and neck cancer; head and neck surgery; quality improvement; quality indicators; reconstructive surgery; value-based funding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29293404     DOI: 10.1177/0194599817742373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Association between blood transfusions and complications in head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Giovacchini; Caterina Bensi; Daniele Paradiso; Raffaella Docimo; Antonio Tullio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sarcopenia is associated with blood transfusions in head and neck cancer free flap surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Joseph Jones; Vincent J Campiti; Mohamedkazim Alwani; Leah J Novinger; Brady Jay Tucker; Andrea Bonetto; Jessica A Yesensky; Michael W Sim; Michael G Moore; Avinash V Mantravadi
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-31

3.  Clinical consequences of head and neck free-flap reconstructions in the DM population.

Authors:  Sheng-Nan Chang; Juey-Jen Hwang; Ting-Han Chiu; Chung-Kan Tsao; Jou-Wei Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Maxillofacial free flap surgery outcomes in critical care: a single-center investigation looking for clues to improvement.

Authors:  Bruno Denis; Claire Gourbeix; Marine Coninckx; Jean-Philippe Foy; Chloé Bertolus; Jean-Michel Constantin; Vincent Degos
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaron Densky; Antoine Eskander; Stephen Kang; Jon Chan; Ben Tweel; Jigar Sitapara; Enver Ozer; Amit Agrawal; Ricardo Carrau; James Rocco; Ted N Teknos; Matthew Old
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.