| Literature DB >> 29292779 |
Changwei Yuan1, Dayong Wu2, Hongchao Liu3.
Abstract
The transportation sector is a complex system. Collecting transportation activity and the associated emissions data is extremely expensive and time-consuming. Grey Relational Analysis provides a viable alternative to overcome data insufficiency and gives insights for decision makers into such a complex system. In this paper, we achieved three major goals: (i) we explored the inter-relationships among transportation development, energy consumption and CO₂ emissions for 30 provincial units in China; (ii) we identified the transportation development mode for each individual province; and (iii) we revealed policy implications regarding the sustainable transportation development at the provincial level. We can classify the 30 provinces into eight development modes according to the calculated Grey Relational Grades. Results also indicated that energy consumption has the largest influence on CO₂ emission changes. Lastly, sustainable transportation policies were discussed at the province level according to the level of economy, urbanization and transportation energy structure.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 emissions; Chinese transport sector; Grey Relational Analysis; energy consumption; province-level; sustainable policy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29292779 PMCID: PMC5750954 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14121536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1China’s Eight Administration Regions (Northeastern, Capital, Northern Coastal, Eastern Coastal, Southern Coastal, Central, Northwestern, and Southwestern).
Figure 2China’s Provincial GDP in 2015; (Note: Ren Ming Bi (RMB), is the Mandarin ping yin (spelling) for China Yuan (CNY). This study includes total 30 Provinces and Municipalities of China, excluding Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and Tibet).
GRGs between Two Transport-Related Factors and CO2 emissions for 30 Provinces and Municipalities of China (1994 to 2012).
| Provincial Unit | GCE (Energy Consumption) | GCT (Transportation Turnover) |
|---|---|---|
| Anhui | −0.9755 | 0.7096 |
| Beijing | −0.9768 | −0.6802 |
| Chongqing | −0.9608 | −0.7836 |
| Fujian | −0.9922 | 0.8823 |
| Gansu | −0.9367 | 0.6259 |
| Guangdong | 0.9896 | 0.6743 |
| Guangxi | 0.9900 | −0.7372 |
| Guizhou | −0.9949 | −0.7947 |
| Hainan | −0.9710 | −0.6946 |
| Hebei | −0.9740 | 0.7831 |
| Heilongjiang | −0.9763 | −0.7696 |
| Henan | 0.9872 | 0.7982 |
| Hubei | −0.9586 | −0.7244 |
| Hunan | −0.9785 | −0.7623 |
| Jilin | 0.9520 | −0.7619 |
| Jiangsu | −0.9862 | 0.8387 |
| Jiangxi | 0.9913 | 0.6052 |
| Liaoning | 0.9689 | 0.7202 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.9758 | −0.8606 |
| Ningxia | −0.9028 | 0.6220 |
| Qinghai | −0.9613 | −0.8760 |
| Shandong | 0.9846 | −0.7696 |
| Shanghai | 0.9845 | 0.6690 |
| Shaanxi | −0.9681 | −0.8623 |
| Shanxi | −0.9562 | −0.7971 |
| Sichuan | −0.9710 | −0.7716 |
| Tianjin | 0.9927 | 0.6787 |
| Xinjiang | −0.9326 | 0.7954 |
| Yunnan | 0.9900 | −0.6747 |
| Zhejiang | −0.9855 | 0.7739 |
The Development Modes of China’s Provincial Transport Sector from 1994 to 2012.
| Development Mode | GRG of Transport Turnover GCT | GRG of Energy Consumption GCE | GRA | Trend | Provincial Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode 1 | <0 | <0 | |GCE| > |GCT| | CIT “↑↑” | Beijing, Chongqing, Guizhou, Hainan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hunan, Qinghai, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Sichuan, |
| Mode 2 | <0 | <0 | |GCE| < |GCT| | CIT “↑” | N/A |
| Mode 3 | >0 | <0 | |GCE| > |GCT| | CIT “↓↓” | Anhui, Fujian, Gansu, Hebei, Jiangsu, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Zhejiang |
| Mode 4 | >0 | <0 | |GCE| < |GCT| | CIT “↓” | N/A |
| Mode 5 | >0 | >0 | |GCE| > |GCT| | CIT “↓↓” | Guangdong, Henan, Jiangxi, Liaoning, Shanghai, Tianjin |
| Mode 6 | >0 | >0 | |GCE| < |GCT| | CIT “↓” | N/A |
| Mode 7 | <0 | >0 | |GCE| > |GCT| | CIT “↑↑” | Guangxi, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Shandong, Yunnan |
| Mode 8 | <0 | >0 | |GCE| < |GCT| | CIT “↑” | N/A |
Note: GCT: GRG between transport turnover and CO2 emission; GCE: GRG between energy consumption and CO2 emission; CIT: CO2 intensity; EIT: energy intensity; EC: emission coefficient; “↑↑”: significant increase; “↓↓”: significant decrease; “↑”: increase; “↓”: decrease.
Figure 3Eight Development Modes of Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Transport Turnover in China’s Provincial Transportation Sectors.
Figure 4The Transport Development Mode Map for China’s 30 Provinces and Municipalities.