| Literature DB >> 29292746 |
Hüseyin Özdeş1, Murat Tiryakioğlu2.
Abstract
In this study, performance of two existing Walker parameter estimation models has been investigated. Results show that those developed mainly for steel did not provide reasonable fits to experimental Walker parameters for fatigue data for Al-7%Si-Mg alloy castings in the literature. A strong relationship between the Walker parameter and the structural quality, quantified by the quality index, QT, was observed and an empirical equation to estimate the Walker parameter for these alloys was developed. These findings indicate that the Walker parameter is not an intrinsic material property and the structural quality of the specimens must be taken into account for mean stress correction in fatigue testing.Entities:
Keywords: Basquin Law; S–N curve; mean stress effect; runout analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29292746 PMCID: PMC5744336 DOI: 10.3390/ma10121401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Tensile data, quality index and estimated Basquin and Walker parameters for the nine datasets.
| Alloy | Ref. | σY (MPa) | ST (MPa) | eF (%) | QT | b | γ | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 356 | [ | 257 | 295 | 1.3 | 0.067 | 0.530 | Machined | ||
| 238 | 239 | 0.6 | 0.027 | 0.563 | As-cast | ||||
| A356 | [ | 240 | 300 | 10.0 | 0.485 | 904.8 | −0.141 | 0.425 | |
| A356 + 0.5Cu | [ | 250 | 330 | 5.7 | 0.285 | 1061 | −0.180 | 0.481 | |
| 357 | [ | 303 | 351 | 4.8 | 0.289 | 989 | −0.213 | 0.476 | Aerospace castings |
| A357 | [ | 275 | 335 | 5.0 | 0.272 | 480 | −0.104 | 0.473 | |
| A357 | [ | 275 | 335 | 6.0 | 0.326 | 768 | −0.141 | 0.461 | |
| F357 | [ | 238 | 239 | 0.6 | 0.027 | 1529 | −0.201 | 0.563 | No FSP |
| 290 | 330 | 15.0 | 0.860 | 1877 | −0.205 | 0.377 | FSP |
Figure 1The S–N curves at R = −1 after Walker mean stress correction for (a) sand cast F357 by Jana et al. [37], (b) A357 by Mu et al. [35], and (c) friction stir processed F357 by Jana et al. [37]. The original data for R = 0 as well as their correction according to Walker equation (Equation (2)) are also indicated.
Figure 2The change in γ as a function of QT.
Figure 3(a) The relationship between γ and ST, as suggested by Dowling et al. [9], and (b) the comparison of Walker parameters for best fit and estimated by using the equation proposed by Lv et al. [8].