Literature DB >> 29292023

Status of microbial based cleaning products in statutory regulations and ecolabelling in Europe, the USA, and Canada.

Armin Spök1, George Arvanitakis2, Gwendolyn McClung3.   

Abstract

Cleaning products containing living microorganisms as active ingredients are increasingly being used in household, professional and industrial cleaning applications. Microorganisms can degrade soiling associated with dirt, food residues, and grease by enzymatic and metabolic action and out-compete microorganisms associated with odor problems. Their potential for odor control seems to result in a competitive advantage over conventional chemically-based cleaning products. Moreover, producers of microbial-based cleaning products (MBCPs) claim that their products are less harmful to the environment. These promising prospects have triggered interest from consumer and environmental organizations, professional users, and regulators in understanding if there are also possible negative health and environmental impacts which require attention and how the safety of these products is ensured. Unfortunately, there is little information on these issues in the public domain. Moreover, regulatory oversight in Europe is essentially limited to pathogenic properties in the context of worker protection. Canada, in contrast, has a regulatory framework in place to assess risks to human health and the environment from the manufacture, import and/or use of new microorganisms contained in MBCPs. In the absence of mandatory standards, safety assessment and hygienic practices seem to vary considerably across companies. Recently developed ecolabelling standards are - for the time being - the only option for transparent compliance to minimum standards in terms of safety as well as assessments of manufacturer information by third parties. These standards highlight in particular the need for precise taxonomic information for assessing the pathogenic properties and the need to ensure the absence of potentially harmful microorganisms as contaminants. Ecolabelling standards are, however, voluntary and do not cover all relevant safety issues. In order to develop a more comprehensive set of mandatory standards for health and safety, a number of areas would benefit from further research (e.g. the role in plant pathogenicity and other environmental properties of the microorganisms used; the relevance of chronic exposure to dusts and aerosols containing vegetative cells and spores; the relevance of strains which belong to species known to include opportunistic pathogens and possible hazards for particularly sensitive risk groups). Improved knowledge in these areas will contribute to a predictable level of product safety. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecolabelling; MBCPs; Microbial based cleaning products; Microbial cleaner; Probiotic cleaner; Risk assessment; Risk management; Safety assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29292023      PMCID: PMC6691958          DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.12.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  11 in total

Review 1.  Relevance of sensitization to occupational allergy and asthma in the detergent industry.

Authors:  David Basketter; Ninna Berg; Francis H Kruszewski; Katherine Sarlo; Beth Concoby
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Microbiological and genetic identification of some probiotics proposed for medical use in 2011.

Authors:  Marco Toscano; Elena de Vecchi; Valentina Rodighiero; Lorenzo Drago
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.714

3.  Microbiological evaluation of commercial probiotic products available in the USA in 2009.

Authors:  L Drago; V Rodighiero; T Celeste; L Rovetto; E De Vecchi
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.714

4.  Categorisation of protein respiratory allergens: the case of Subtilisin.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; David A Basketter
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Regulatory role of gammadelta T cells in the recruitment of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to lung and subsequent pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Philip L Simonian; Christina L Roark; Fernando Diaz del Valle; Brent E Palmer; Ivor S Douglas; Koichi Ikuta; Willi K Born; Rebecca L O'Brien; Andrew P Fontenot
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Labeling quality and molecular characterization studies of products containing Lactobacillus spp. strains.

Authors:  Giovanna Blandino; Davide Fazio; Giulio Petronio Petronio; Rosanna Inturri; Gianna Tempera; Pio Maria Furneri
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.219

7.  Industrial fungal enzymes: an occupational allergen perspective.

Authors:  Brett J Green; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-21

8.  Hard surface biocontrol in hospitals using microbial-based cleaning products.

Authors:  Alberta Vandini; Robin Temmerman; Alessia Frabetti; Elisabetta Caselli; Paola Antonioli; Pier Giorgio Balboni; Daniela Platano; Alessio Branchini; Sante Mazzacane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validating bifidobacterial species and subspecies identity in commercial probiotic products.

Authors:  Zachery T Lewis; Guy Shani; Chad F Masarweh; Mina Popovic; Steve A Frese; David A Sela; Mark A Underwood; David A Mills
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Impact of a Probiotic-Based Cleaning Intervention on the Microbiota Ecosystem of the Hospital Surfaces: Focus on the Resistome Remodulation.

Authors:  Elisabetta Caselli; Maria D'Accolti; Alberta Vandini; Luca Lanzoni; Maria Teresa Camerada; Maddalena Coccagna; Alessio Branchini; Paola Antonioli; Pier Giorgio Balboni; Dario Di Luca; Sante Mazzacane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinically relevant pathogens on surfaces display differences in survival and transcriptomic response in relation to probiotic and traditional cleaning strategies.

Authors:  Jinglin Hu; Weitao Shuai; Jack T Sumner; Anahid A Moghadam; Erica M Hartmann
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 8.462

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.