Literature DB >> 29291960

The Establishment of the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR): Monitoring and Optimising Outcomes for Cardiac Patients in Victoria.

Dion Stub1, Jeffrey Lefkovits2, Angela L Brennan3, Diem Dinh3, Rita Brien3, Stephen J Duffy4, Nicholas Cox5, Voltaire Nadurata6, David J Clark7, Nick Andrianopoulos3, Richard Harper8, John McNeil3, Christopher M Reid9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) was established in 2012 to ensure the safety and quality of cardiac based therapies across Victoria. As a clinical quality registry, VCOR monitors the performance of health services in both the public and private sectors, by measuring and reporting on trends in the quality of patient care over time, within individual hospitals, comparatively with other hospitals, and aggregated at the state level. The current paper describes the VCOR registry aims, methods, governance structure and progress to date.
METHODS: Primary management of the registry is undertaken at Monash University in association with the Victorian Cardiac Clinical Network, Department of Health and Human Services Victoria.
RESULTS: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry has currently collected data on more than 33,000 cardiac patients across three separate areas of interest in 35 hospitals. These include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the early treatment of acute myocardial infarction in rural and regional settings, and data relating to in-hospital management of heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry is a clinical cardiac registry that commenced data collection in 2013, providing a detailed description of selected aspects of contemporary cardiology clinical practice in a majority of Victorian hospitals. This information enables hospitals and cardiac units to benchmark their practice, clinical outcomes and quality of care to other similar units and hospitals across the state. If replicated by other states in Australia, there will be the potential for important national comparisons, with the goal to foster continuous improvement in patient care and outcomes across the entire Australian health system.
Copyright © 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac outcomes; Quality; Registry; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29291960     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  14 in total

1.  Impact of emergency medical service delays on time to reperfusion and mortality in STEMI.

Authors:  Ahmad Alrawashdeh; Ziad Nehme; Brett Williams; Karen Smith; Angela Brennan; Diem T Dinh; Danny Liew; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Dion Stub
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-05

2.  Temporal Changes in Pollen Concentration Predict Short-Term Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Omar Al-Mukhtar; Sara Vogrin; Edwin R Lampugnani; Samer Noaman; Diem T Dinh; Angela L Brennan; Christopher Reid; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Nicholas Cox; Dion Stub; William Chan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Julia Stehli; Catherine Martin; Angela Brennan; Diem T Dinh; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Sarah Zaman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Development of a binational thyroid cancer clinical quality registry: a protocol paper.

Authors:  Liane J Ioannou; Jonathan Serpell; Joanne Dean; Cino Bendinelli; Jenny Gough; Dean Lisewski; Julie A Miller; Win Meyer-Rochow; Stan Sidhu; Duncan Topliss; David Walters; John Zalcberg; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Does sex predict quality of life after acute coronary syndromes: an Australian, state-wide, multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Youlin Koh; Julia Stehli; Catherine Martin; Angela Brennan; Diem T Dinh; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Sarah Zaman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Novel insights into clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.

Authors:  Hoa T T Vu; Hung M Pham; Hoai T T Nguyen; Quang N Nguyen; Loi D Do; Ngoc M Pham; Richard Norman; Rachel R Huxley; Crystal M Y Lee; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-09-04

7.  Differences in outcomes of patients with in-hospital versus out-of-hospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a registry analysis.

Authors:  Julia Stehli; Misha Dagan; Diem T Dinh; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Ron Dick; Stephanie Oxley; Angela L Brennan; Stephen J Duffy; Sarah Zaman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention: A propensity-score matched analysis of Victorian data.

Authors:  Peter Lee; Angela Brennan; Diem Dinh; Dion Stub; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Christopher M Reid; Ella Zomer; Ken Chin; Danny Liew
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.287

9.  Establishment of a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry in Vietnam: Rationale and Methodology.

Authors:  Hoa T T Vu; Hoai T T Nguyen; Hung M Pham; Loi D Do; Quang N Nguyen; Richard Norman; Rachel R Huxley; Ngoc M Pham; Crystal M Y Lee; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-04-08

10.  Estimating the economic impacts of percutaneous coronary intervention in Australia: a registry-based cost burden study.

Authors:  Peter Lee; Angela L Brennan; Dion Stub; Diem T Dinh; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Christopher M Reid; Ella Zomer; Danny Liew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.