Kelsie Riemenschneider1, Jesse Liu2, Jennifer G Powers3. 1. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: kriemen1@uthsc.edu. 2. Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occupational sun exposure is a well-studied risk factor for skin cancer development, but more work is needed to assess melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer risk among US military personnel to improve education and screening efforts in this population. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an extensive review of skin cancer risks for US military personnel to inform preventive education, diagnosis, and treatment efforts to better protect these individuals from future skin cancer development. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies on the subject of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in military personnel was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies describing skin cancer incidence in the US military were identified, with 4 studies specific to melanoma. The study findings reveal an increased risk for melanoma associated with service in the military or prisoner of war status. Service in tropical environments was associated with an increased incidence of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among World War II soldiers. Two studies found that increased melanoma risk was also branch dependent, with the highest rates among the United States Air Force. Several of the reviewed studies implicated increased sun exposure during military service and lack of sufficient sun protection as the causes of higher rates of skin cancer among US military and veteran populations as compared with among the nonmilitary population in the United States. LIMITATIONS: The reviewed articles have variable results; a prospective randomized controlled trial would be helpful to develop interventions that mitigate skin cancer risk in the US military. CONCLUSION: This review identifies an abundance of evidence for an increased risk for skin cancer development among US active duty and veteran populations.
BACKGROUND: Occupational sun exposure is a well-studied risk factor for skin cancer development, but more work is needed to assess melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer risk among US military personnel to improve education and screening efforts in this population. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an extensive review of skin cancer risks for US military personnel to inform preventive education, diagnosis, and treatment efforts to better protect these individuals from future skin cancer development. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies on the subject of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in military personnel was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies describing skin cancer incidence in the US military were identified, with 4 studies specific to melanoma. The study findings reveal an increased risk for melanoma associated with service in the military or prisoner of war status. Service in tropical environments was associated with an increased incidence of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among World War II soldiers. Two studies found that increased melanoma risk was also branch dependent, with the highest rates among the United States Air Force. Several of the reviewed studies implicated increased sun exposure during military service and lack of sufficient sun protection as the causes of higher rates of skin cancer among US military and veteran populations as compared with among the nonmilitary population in the United States. LIMITATIONS: The reviewed articles have variable results; a prospective randomized controlled trial would be helpful to develop interventions that mitigate skin cancer risk in the US military. CONCLUSION: This review identifies an abundance of evidence for an increased risk for skin cancer development among US active duty and veteran populations.
Authors: Barbara J Walkosz; David B Buller; Peter A Andersen; Allan Wallis; Mary Klein Buller; Michael D Scott Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Martina Sanlorenzo; Mackenzie R Wehner; Eleni Linos; John Kornak; Wolfgang Kainz; Christian Posch; Igor Vujic; Katia Johnston; Deborah Gho; Gabriela Monico; James T McGrath; Simona Osella-Abate; Pietro Quaglino; James E Cleaver; Susana Ortiz-Urda Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Alessandra Buja; John H Lange; Egle Perissinotto; Giuseppe Rausa; Francesco Grigoletto; Cristina Canova; Giuseppe Mastrangelo Journal: Toxicol Ind Health Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Kevin Cheung; Aaron D Bossler; Sarah L Mott; Megan Zeisler; Julie McKillip; Yousef Zakharia; Brian L Swick; Jennifer G Powers Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Luigi Vimercati; Luigi De Maria; Antonio Caputi; Enza Sabrina Silvana Cannone; Francesca Mansi; Domenica Cavone; Paolo Romita; Giuseppe Argenziano; Alessandro Di Stefani; Aurora Parodi; Ketty Peris; Massimiliano Scalvenzi; Giampiero Girolomoni; Caterina Foti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.390