| Literature DB >> 29291063 |
Mary Morgan-Richards1, Mariana Bulgarella1, Louisa Sivyer1, Edwina J Dowle2, Marie Hale3, Natasha E McKean1, Steven A Trewick1.
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.Entities:
Keywords: DNA barcoding; Hemideina; constraining selection; genetic drift; mtDNA divergence; population size
Year: 2017 PMID: 29291063 PMCID: PMC5717637 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Spatial distribution of mtDNA haplotype diversity within the New Zealand tree wētēt H. crassidens (yellow). A network of all mtDNA haplotypes observed within a single population sample (Rangiwahia) illustrates difference between DNA sequences and their relative frequency (circle area is scaled to sample size).
Figure 2.Spatial distribution of mtDNA diversity within the New Zealand tree wētā H. crassidens across its natural range (yellow shading). Genetic landscape X and Y axes correspond to geographical locations of population samples within the overall physical landscape examined for the whole range of H. crassidens. Surface plot heights reflect relative genetic distances, data from Bulgarella et al. [44].
Figure 3.The non-recombining mtDNA has a bimodal frequency distribution of pairwise differences generated by the coalescent process in a large population, for whole H. crassidens species dataset (dotted red line), and Rangiwahia population sample (black fill) (a). Unimodal frequency distributions of morphological traits suggest that hybridization is not the cause of high mtDNA variation within a single population sample of the New Zealand wētā H. crassidens. Variation in numbers of stridulatory ridges (b) and spines on hind tibia (c) in Rangiwahia population sample are not concordant with mtDNA lineages of specimens; haplogroup 2 (blue) and haplogroup 3 (pink).
Genetic diversity within a single population sample of the tree wētā H. crassidens for five nuclear markers. (Sample is divided using the two distinct mtDNA haplogroups observed. The number of alleles per locus is indicated along with (number) of alleles restricted to each mtDNA haplogroup. n = sample size.)
| nuclear loci | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MtDNA | ||||||
| haplogroup 2 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 12 (6) | 3 (1) | 3 (1) |
| haplogroup 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 (1) |
Assignment of wētā individuals to clusters based on mtDNA haplogroup is not concordant with cluster assignment based on Bayesian modelling using principal components of phenotypic and genotypic variation. (Alternative assignments indicated by italics.)
| mtDNA | assigned cluster | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wētā ID | sex | age | haplogroup | PC 1 and 2 | PC 1–5 |
| Hc-Ran-618 | female | juvenile | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-624 | female | adult | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-619 | male | adult | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-620 | female | adult | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1308 | female | adult | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1310 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1311 | female | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1312 | female | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1328 | female | adult | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1315 | female | adult | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-622 | female | adult | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1316 | male | juvenile | 3 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1317 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1318 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1319 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1320 | female | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1321 | female | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1322 | female | juvenile | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1323 | male | juvenile | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1324 | female | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1325 | female | juvenile | 1 | ||
| Hc-Ran-1326 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-1327 | male | juvenile | 1 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-NN | female | juvenile | 3 | 1 | |
| Hc-Ran-621 | female | adult | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Hc-Ran-1309 | male | adult | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Hc-Ran-1313 | female | juvenile | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Hc-Ran-1314 | female | adult | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Hc-Ran-623 | male | adult | 3 | 1 | |