| Literature DB >> 29290722 |
Yuan Li1, Yan Zhang2, Longshan Lin1, Tianxiang Gao3, Liqin Liu3.
Abstract
Pampus argenteus is an economically important fish that is often erroneously identified as Pampus echinogaster. No population genetic analyses have been performed on the true P. argenteus species. Here, the mitochondrial control region (CR) was used to evaluate the population genetics and elaborate the historical demography of the Silver pomfret collected from six geographical locations in China, Pakistan, and Kuwait. A high level of genetic diversity was demonstrated in this species. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that the genetic divergence was mainly derived from within the populations (P < 0.05). A historical demographic analysis indicated that the Silver pomfret experienced a recent population expansion during the late Pleistocene. The phylogeographical structure revealed two obvious lineages that diverged in the late Pleistocene, during which the Silver pomfret populations historically experienced exotic divergence and mixed again with differentiated populations. Currently, Silver pomfret populations have insufficient time to attain migration-drift equilibrium. Population genetic data of the Silver pomfret can provide preliminary genetic knowledge for its fishery management.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic structure; Pampus argenteus; mitochondrial DNA; population expansion; population genetics
Year: 2017 PMID: 29290722 PMCID: PMC5740407 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.719.19914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Sampling locations of .
Information and molecular indices of .
| ID | Populations | Number | Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | Sonmiani Bay | 22 | 2010.12 | 12 | 7 | 0.8658±0.0652 | 0.0116±0.0066 | 4.4416±2.2765 |
| N | Pasni | 12 | 2010.12 | 10 | 6 | 0.9697±0.0443 | 0.0169±0.0097 | 6.4394±3.2798 |
| O | Ormara | 24 | 2010.12 | 15 | 10 | 0.9275±0.0388 | 0.0146±0.0081 | 5.5906±2.7812 |
| K | Kuwait | 22 | 2011.09 | 10 | 8 | 0.7100±0.1064 | 0.0114±0.0065 | 4.3593±2.2397 |
| T | Taiwan | 10 | 2012.09 | 8 | 4 | 0.9333±0.0773 | 0.0114±0.0070 | 4.3778±2.3612 |
| X | Xiamen | 24 | 2014.04 | 13 | 8 | 0.9203±0.0326 | 0.0108±0.0062 | 4.1051±2.1186 |
| Total | 114 | – | 51 | – | 0.9322±0.0134 | 0.0183±0.0096 | 7.0202±3.3217 | |
Note: NH, numbers of haplotypes; NUH, numbers of specific haplotypes; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; k, average number of pairwise differences.
Distribution of haplotypes among all silver pomfret populations in lineage A and B.
| haplotype | Total | S | N | O | K | T | X | haplotype | Total | S | N | O | K | T | X | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage A | Hap_2 | 1 | 1 | Lineage B | Hap_1 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Hap_3 | 1 | 1 | Hap_6 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_4 | 1 | 1 | Hap_7 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_5 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | Hap_8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Hap_9 | 2 | 2 | Hap_11 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_10 | 13 | 1 | 12 | Hap_14 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Hap_12 | 1 | 1 | Hap_15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Hap_13 | 1 | 1 | Hap_17 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_16 | 1 | 1 | Hap_20 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_18 | 1 | 1 | Hap_25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Hap_19 | 1 | 1 | Hap_32 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_21 | 1 | 1 | Hap_35 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_22 | 1 | 1 | Hap_36 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_23 | 1 | 1 | Hap_38 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_24 | 1 | 1 | Hap_39 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Hap_26 | 1 | 1 | Hap_40 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_27 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | Hap_41 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Hap_28 | 1 | 1 | Hap_44 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_29 | 1 | 1 | Hap_45 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_30 | 1 | 1 | Hap_46 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_31 | 1 | 1 | Hap_47 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Hap_33 | 1 | 1 | Total | 40 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 | |||||||
| Hap_34 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_37 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_42 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_43 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_48 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_49 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_50 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Hap_51 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | 74 | 13 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 15 | ||||||||||
Figure 2.NJ tree of CR haplotypes of . was used as the out-group. Bootstrap supports >50 in 1,000 replicates are shown.
Figure 3.Unrooted minimum spanning tree depicting the genetic relationship among the CR haplotypes of . Circle sizes are proportional to the haplotype frequency. Perpendicular tick marks on the lines joining the haplotypes represent the number of nucleotide substitutions.
Matrix of pairwise FST values between six populations based on mitochondrial CR sequences.
| X | K | N | O | S | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | ||||||
| K | 0.061* | |||||
| N | 0.012 | 0.046 | ||||
| O | 0.018 | 0.051 | -0.013 | |||
| S | 0.014 | 0.062 | 0.018 | 0.015 | ||
| T | -0.025 | 0.061 | 0.019 | 0.044 | 0.022 |
* significant at P < 0.05 by the permutation test.
AMOVA of populations based on mitochondrial CR sequences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Among populations | 128.103 | 33.28 |
| 0.000 |
| Within populations | 268.537 | 66.72 | ||
|
| ||||
| Among groups | 20.768 | -5.02 |
| 0.608 |
| Among populations within groups | 107.336 | 36.67 |
| 0.000 |
| Within populations | 268.537 | 68.36 |
| 0.000 |
|
| ||||
| Among groups | 120.461 | 39.79 |
| 0.054 |
| Among populations within groups | 7.642 | 0.09 |
| 0.425 |
| Within populations | 268.537 | 60.13 |
| 0.000 |
Figure 4.Mismatch distributions of control region haplotypes of .
Summary of molecular diversity, neutral test and goodness-of-fit test for .
| Number |
|
|
|
| Tajima’s | Fu’s | Goodness-of-fit test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Lineage A | 74 | 30 | 0.865±0.028 | 0.017±0.009 | 6.557±3.134 | -0.046 | 0.552 | -8.967 | 0.017 | 14.889 | 0.004 | 8.235 | 0.031ns | 0.033ns |
| Lineage B | 40 | 21 | 0.908±0.034 | 0.011±0.006 | 4.222±2.140 | -1.261 | 0.080 | -9.606 | 0.001 | 5.426 | 0.000 | 11.953 | 0.015ns | 0.037ns |
| All | 114 | 51 | 0.932±0.013 | 0.018±0.010 | 7.020±3.322 | -0.094 | 0.058 | -2.454 | 0.049 | 10.555 | 0.000 | 7.200 | 0.038ns | 0.042ns |
Note: NH, numbers of haplotypes; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; k, average number of pairwise differences; ns, P>0.05.
Figure 5.Bayesian skyline plots showing NT (N = effective population size; T = generation time) changes over time for based on CR sequences. The upper and lower limits of the blue line represent the 95% confidence intervals of highest posterior densities (HPD) analysis. The black line represents median estimates of NT.