Literature DB >> 29290448

Technical note: Validation of an ear-tag accelerometer sensor to determine rumination, eating, and activity behaviors of grazing dairy cattle.

G M Pereira1, B J Heins2, M I Endres1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate an ear-tag accelerometer sensor (CowManager SensOor, Agis Automatisering BV, Harmelen, the Netherlands) using direct visual observations in a grazing dairy herd. Lactating crossbred cows (n = 24) were used for this experiment at the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center grazing dairy (Morris, MN) during the summer of 2016. A single trained observer recorded behavior every minute for 6 h for each cow (24 cows × 6 h = 144 h of observation total). Direct visual observation was compared with sensor data during August and September 2016. The sensor detected and identified ear and head movements, and through algorithms the sensor classified each minute as one of the following behaviors: rumination, eating, not active, active, and high active. A 2-sided t-test was conducted with PROC TTEST of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to compare the percentage of time each cow's behavior was recorded by direct visual observation and sensor data. For total recorded time, the percentage of time of direct visual observation compared with sensor data was 17.9 and 19.1% for rumination, 52.8 and 51.9% for eating, 17.4 and 11.9% for not active, and 7.9 and 21.1% for active. Pearson correlations (PROC CORR of SAS) were used to evaluate associations between direct visual observations and sensor data. Furthermore, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), bias correction factors, location shift, and scale shift (epiR package of R version 3.3.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were calculated to provide a measure of accuracy and precision. Correlations between visual observations for all 4 behaviors were highly to weakly correlated (rumination: r = 0.72, CCC = 0.71; eating: r = 0.88, CCC = 0.88; not active: r = 0.65, CCC = 0.52; and active: r = 0.20, CCC = 0.19) compared with sensor data. The results suggest that the sensor accurately monitors rumination and eating behavior of grazing dairy cattle. However, active behaviors may be more difficult for the sensor to record than others.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior monitoring; pasture; precision technology; rumination

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290448     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring and Improving the Metabolic Health of Dairy Cows during the Transition Period.

Authors:  Luciano S Caixeta; Bobwealth O Omontese
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Yaneth Gómez; Greta V Berteselli; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Elisabetta Canali; Jarkko K Niemi; Pol Llonch; Matti Pastell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-29

3.  Effect of oral calcium administration on metabolic status and uterine health of dairy cows with reduced postpartum rumination and eating time.

Authors:  Pablo Pinedo; Diego Manríquez; Nicolas Marotta; Giuliano Mongiello; Carlos Risco; Leen Leenaerts; Hans Bothe; Juan Velez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Livestock Informatics Toolkit: A Case Study in Visually Characterizing Complex Behavioral Patterns across Multiple Sensor Platforms, Using Novel Unsupervised Machine Learning and Information Theoretic Approaches.

Authors:  Catherine McVey; Fushing Hsieh; Diego Manriquez; Pablo Pinedo; Kristina Horback
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Dietary zinc concentration and lipopolysaccharide injection affect circulating trace minerals, acute phase protein response, and behavior as evaluated by an ear-tag-based accelerometer in beef steers.

Authors:  Katherine R VanValin; Remy N Carmichael-Wyatt; Erin L Deters; Elizabeth M Messersmith; Katie J Heiderscheit; Katherine G Hochmuth; Trey D Jackson; Joshua M Peschel; Anna K Johnson; Stephanie L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Validation of NEDAP Monitoring Technology for Measurements of Feeding, Rumination, Lying, and Standing Behaviors, and Comparison with Visual Observation and Video Recording in Buffaloes.

Authors:  Ray Adil Quddus; Nisar Ahmad; Anjum Khalique; Jalees Ahmed Bhatti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Technological Tools for the Early Detection of Bovine Respiratory Disease in Farms.

Authors:  Andrea Puig; Miguel Ruiz; Marta Bassols; Lorenzo Fraile; Ramon Armengol
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  The effect of an organic rumen-protected fat supplement on performance, metabolic status, and health of dairy cows.

Authors:  Diego Manriquez; Liang Chen; Pedro Melendez; Pablo Pinedo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Animal Welfare Implications of Digital Tools for Monitoring and Management of Cattle and Sheep on Pasture.

Authors:  Anders Herlin; Emma Brunberg; Jan Hultgren; Niclas Högberg; Anna Rydberg; Anna Skarin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.