Literature DB >> 29290435

Moderate lameness leads to marked behavioral changes in dairy cows.

H C Weigele1, L Gygax2, A Steiner3, B Wechsler2, J-B Burla2.   

Abstract

Lameness is one of the most prevalent diseases affecting the welfare of cows in modern dairy production. Lameness leads to behavioral changes in severely lame cows, which have been investigated in much detail. For early detection of lameness, knowledge of the effects of moderate lameness on cow behavior is crucial. Therefore, the behavior of nonlame and moderately lame cows was compared on 17 Swiss dairy farms. On each farm, 5 to 11 nonlame (locomotion score 1 of 5) and 2 to 7 moderately lame (locomotion score 3 of 5) cows were selected for data collection in two 48-h periods (A, B) separated by an interval of 6 to 10 wk. Based on visual locomotion scoring, 142 nonlame and 66 moderately lame cows were examined in period A and 128 nonlame and 53 moderately lame cows in period B. Between these 2 periods, the cows underwent corrective hoof trimming. Lying behavior, locomotor activity, and neck activity were recorded by accelerometers (MSR145 data logger, MSR Electronics GmbH, Seuzach, Switzerland), and feeding and rumination behaviors by noseband sensors (RumiWatch halter, ITIN + HOCH GmbH, Liestal, Switzerland). Furthermore, visits to the brush and the concentrate feeder, and the milking order position were recorded. In comparison with nonlame cows, moderately lame cows had a longer lying duration, a longer average lying bout duration, and a greater lateral asymmetry in lying duration. Average locomotor activity, locomotor activity during 1 h after feed delivery or push-ups, and average neck activity were lower in moderately lame cows. Eating time and the number of eating chews (jaw movements) were reduced in moderately lame compared with nonlame cows, whereas no effect of moderate lameness was evident for ruminating time, number of ruminating chews and boluses, and average number of ruminating chews per bolus. Moderately lame cows visited the concentrate feeder and the brush less frequently, and they were further back in the milking order compared with nonlame cows. In conclusion, nonlame and moderately lame cows differed in a biologically relevant way in many of the behavioral variables investigated in this study. Therefore, the use of these behavioral changes seems to be promising to develop a tool for early lameness detection. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic recording; behavior; dairy cow; early detection; lameness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290435     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of and factors associated with swellings of the ribs in tie stall housed dairy cows in Germany.

Authors:  Greta E Abele; Yury Zablotski; Melanie Feist; K Charlotte Jensen; Annegret Stock; Amely Campe; Roswitha Merle; Andreas W Oehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Space-use patterns highlight behavioural differences linked to lameness, parity, and days in milk in barn-housed dairy cows.

Authors:  Jorge A Vázquez Diosdado; Zoe E Barker; Holly R Hodges; Jonathan R Amory; Darren P Croft; Nick J Bell; Edward A Codling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of Lameness on the Lying Behaviour of Zero-Grazed Lactating Jersey Dairy Cattle Housed in Straw Yards.

Authors:  Nicola Blackie; Lawrence Maclaurin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  A Review: Development of Computer Vision-Based Lameness Detection for Dairy Cows and Discussion of the Practical Applications.

Authors:  Xi Kang; Xu Dong Zhang; Gang Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Proximity Interactions in a Permanently Housed Dairy Herd: Network Structure, Consistency, and Individual Differences.

Authors:  Kareemah Chopra; Holly R Hodges; Zoe E Barker; Jorge A Vázquez Diosdado; Jonathan R Amory; Tom C Cameron; Darren P Croft; Nick J Bell; Edward A Codling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  Identifying cow - level factors and farm characteristics associated with locomotion scores in dairy cows using cumulative link mixed models.

Authors:  Andreas W Oehm; Roswitha Merle; Annegret Tautenhahn; K Charlotte Jensen; Kerstin-Elisabeth Mueller; Melanie Feist; Yury Zablotski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effects of cow dominance on the use of a mechanical brush.

Authors:  Borbala Foris; Benjamin Lecorps; Joseph Krahn; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Preventive Hoof Trimming and Animal-Based Welfare Measures Influence the Time to First Lameness Event and Hoof Lesion Prevalence in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Mohammed B Sadiq; Siti Z Ramanoon; Wan Mastura M Shaik Mossadeq; Rozaihan Mansor; Sharifah S Syed-Hussain
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 9.  Alterations in sick dairy cows' daily behavioural patterns.

Authors:  I Dittrich; M Gertz; J Krieter
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 10.  Alteration in Activity Patterns of Cows as a Result of Pain Due to Health Conditions.

Authors:  Eva Mainau; Pol Llonch; Déborah Temple; Laurent Goby; Xavier Manteca
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.