Literature DB >> 29290426

Evaluation and validation of an automatic jaw movement recorder (RumiWatch) for ingestive and rumination behaviors of dairy cows during grazing and supplementation.

M Rombach1, A Münger2, J Niederhauser3, K-H Südekum4, F Schori5.   

Abstract

Observation of ingestive and rumination behaviors of dairy cows may assist in detecting diseases, controlling reproductive status, and estimating intake. However, direct observation of cows on pasture is time consuming and can be difficult to realize. Consequently, different systems have been developed to automatically record behavioral characteristics; among them is the RumiWatch System (RWS; Itin and Hoch GmbH, Liestal, Switzerland). Until now, the RWS has not been thoroughly validated under grazing conditions. The aim of the current study was to validate the RWS, against direct observation, in measuring ingestive and rumination behaviors of dairy cows during grazing and supplementation in the barn. A further objective was to examine whether it is possible to refine the algorithm used by the evaluation software RumiWatch Converter 0.7.3.2 to improve the accuracy of the RWS. The data were collected from an experiment carried out with 18 lactating Holstein cows in a crossover block design including 3 treatments and 3 measuring periods. All cows grazed night and day, 19 h/d, and were either unsupplemented or supplemented, with chopped whole-plant corn silage, or chopped whole-plant corn silage mixed with a protein concentrate. During the measuring periods, cows were equipped with the RumiWatch Halter, and their ingestive and rumination behaviors were recorded concurrently by the RumiWatch Halter and by direct observation (690 × 10 min). Comparison of concurrently measured data shows that the RWS detected jaw movements reliably, but classification errors occurred. A low relative prediction error of ≤0.10 for the number of rumination boluses, rumination chews, and total eating chews was found. A high relative prediction error of >0.10 was found for the number of prehension bites and time spent in prehension and eating. Both converter versions performed equally well in differentiating ingestive and rumination behaviors when cows were supplemented in the barn or when grazing and supplementation activities were combined. For grazing cows, with no supplementation, more reliable results for the total number of eating chews, rumination chews, prehension bites, and time spent in these activities were obtained, by using the RumiWatch Converter 0.7.3.11. In light of these findings, further research is warranted to improve the accuracy of the RWS and to allow a differentiation between mastication chews and prehension bites while eating. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic jaw movement recorder; dairy cow; grazing behavior; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290426     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

Review 1.  Industry 4.0 and Precision Livestock Farming (PLF): An up to Date Overview across Animal Productions.

Authors:  Sarah Morrone; Corrado Dimauro; Filippo Gambella; Maria Grazia Cappai
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Image classification of forage grasses on Etuoke Banner using edge autoencoder network.

Authors:  Ding Han; Minghua Tian; Caili Gong; Shilong Zhang; Yushuang Ji; Xinyu Du; Yongfeng Wei; Liang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  TECHNICAL NOTE: Development of a pressure sensor-based system for measuring rumination time in pre-weaned dairy calves.

Authors:  Mehdi Eslamizad; Lisa-Maria Tümmler; Michael Derno; Matthias Hoch; Björn Kuhla
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Understanding intake on pastures: how, why, and a way forward.

Authors:  William B Smith; Michael L Galyean; Robert L Kallenbach; Paul L Greenwood; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Maximising Lucerne (Medicago sativa) Pasture Intake of Dairy Cows: 2-the Effect of Post-Grazing Pasture Height and Mixed Ration Level.

Authors:  Kieran A D Ison; Marcelo A Benvenutti; David G Mayer; Simon Quigley; David G Barber
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Evaluation and application potential of an accelerometer-based collar device for measuring grazing behavior of dairy cows.

Authors:  J Werner; C Umstatter; L Leso; E Kennedy; A Geoghegan; L Shalloo; M Schick; B O'Brien
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What, how, and how much do herbivores eat? The Continuous Bite Monitoring method for assessing forage intake of grazing animals.

Authors:  Anderson Michel Soares Bolzan; Leonardo S Szymczak; Laura Nadin; Olivier Jean F Bonnet; Marcelo O Wallau; Anibal de Moraes; Renata F Moraes; Alda L G Monteiro; Paulo C F Carvalho
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The ability of magnetic field sensors to monitor feeding in three domestic herbivores.

Authors:  Christina C Mulvenna; Rory P Wilson; Nikki J Marks; Aaron G Maule; David M Scantlebury
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Machine Learning Based Prediction of Insufficient Herbage Allowance with Automated Feeding Behaviour and Activity Data.

Authors:  Abu Zar Shafiullah; Jessica Werner; Emer Kennedy; Lorenzo Leso; Bernadette O'Brien; Christina Umstätter
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Animal Welfare Implications of Digital Tools for Monitoring and Management of Cattle and Sheep on Pasture.

Authors:  Anders Herlin; Emma Brunberg; Jan Hultgren; Niclas Högberg; Anna Rydberg; Anna Skarin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.