Literature DB >> 29290248

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated hilar and mediastinal non-small cell lung cancers.

Zachary D Horne1, Adam H Richman2, Michael J Dohopolski2, David A Clump2, Steven A Burton2, Dwight E Heron2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The seminal phase II trial for pulmonary stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) suggested that SBRT to central lesions resulted in unacceptable toxicity. Alternative dose-fractionation schemes have been proposed which may improve safety without compromise of efficacy. We report our institutional outcomes of SBRT for hilar/mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with NSCLC in a hilar or mediastinal nodal station which was treated with SBRT. Patients presented with a lesion involving the hilum or mediastinum from primary or oligorecurrent NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank testing and Cox analysis were utilized for outcomes analysis.
RESULTS: From 2008-2015, 40 patients with median age of 70 were treated with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal NSCLC with median follow-up of 16.4 months. 85% presented with oligorecurrent disease at a median of 22.4 months following definitive therapy. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, the hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. The median dose was 48Gy in 4 fractions (range: 35-48Gy in 4-5 fractions). Median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals were 22.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Two-year local control was 87.7% and not significantly different between hilar and mediastinal targets. Median PFS was significantly improved in patients with hilar vs mediastinal nodal targets: 33.3 vs 8.4 months, respectively (p=0.031). OS was not statistically different between hilar and mediastinal targets (p=0.359). On multivariable analysis, hilar vs mediastinal target predicted for PFS (HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833], p=0.042), as did shorter time to presentation in patients with oligorecurrence (HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000], p=0.049). Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient.
CONCLUSION: Hilar/mediastinal SBRT appears to be a safe technique for the local control of isolated nodal disease with limited toxicity from the fractionation schemes utilized.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290248     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  14 in total

1.  Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases.

Authors:  Francesco Deodato; Gabriella Macchia; Milly Buwenge; Mattia Bonetti; Savino Cilla; Alice Zamagni; Alessia Re; Donato Pezzulla; Francesco Cellini; Lidia Strigari; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Salvage Photon or Proton Radiotherapy for Oligo-recurrence in Regional Lymph Nodes After Surgery for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Kayoko Ohnishi; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Kensuke Nakazawa; Toshihiro Shiozawa; Toshiyuki Okumura; Ikuo Sekine; Yukio Sato; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Stereobody radiotherapy for nodal recurrences in oligometastatic patients: a pooled analysis from two phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alessio G Morganti; Gabriella Macchia; Francesco Deodato; Milena Ferro; Savino Cilla; Anna Ianiro; Milly Buwenge; Alessia Re; Giuseppina Sallustio; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Can high-risk CT features suggest local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Darragh F Halpenny; Yeon Joo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Chong Hyun Suh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for malignant mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael C Tjong; Nauman H Malik; Hanbo Chen; R Gabriel Boldt; George Li; Patrick Cheung; Ian Poon; Yee C Ung; May Tsao; Alexander V Louie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for central lung tumors: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy in the "no fly" zone.

Authors:  Nissar Ahmed; Shaakir Hasan; Lana Schumacher; Athanasios Colonias; Rodney E Wegner
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus fractionated radiation therapy for early-stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid.

Authors:  Rodney E Wegner; Stephen Abel; Zachary D Horne; Shaakir Hasan; Athanasios Colonias; Vivek Verma
Journal:  Lung Cancer Manag       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 8.  [Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Yuming Wan; Jing Huang; Feng Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2018-05-20

9.  Optimized CyberKnife Lung Treatment: Effect of Fractionated Tracking Volume Change on Tracking Results.

Authors:  Guo-Quan Li; Ye Wang; Meng-Jun Qiu; Jing Yang; Zhen-Jun Peng; Sheng Zhang; Xiefan Fang; Sheng-Li Yang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Low-dose hilar and mediastinal stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of outcomes in patients receiving one or multiple courses of treatment.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; James M Larner; Charles R Kersh
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.