BACKGROUND: Many individuals who die by suicide present for nonbehavioral health care prior to death. The risk is often undetected. Universal suicide screening in health care may improve risk recognition. A quality improvement project involving a universal suicide screening program was designed and developed in a large safety-net health care system. METHODS: The steps in developing and implementing this quality improvement program were gathering intelligence, examining resources, designing the screening program, creating a clinical response, constructing an electronic health record screening protocol, clinical workforce education, and program implementation. This project used the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Clinical Practice Screener-Recent, and a preliminary clinical decision support system. RESULTS: Prevalence data on suicide risk levels are provided for 328,064 adult encounters from the first six months of the screening program. Approximately half of the screens were completed in the outpatient clinics, more than 40% in the emergency department (ED), and slightly less than 5% in the hospital inpatient units. In the ED, 6.3% of the screens were positive, as were 1.6% in the inpatient units, and 2.1% in the outpatient clinics. The odds of a positive suicide screening in the ED was 4.29 times higher than the inpatient units and 3.13 times higher than the outpatient clinics. CONCLUSION: A new quality improvement program for universal suicide screening was successfully implemented in a large safety-net health care system. The burden to the system from universal screening was not overwhelming and was managed effectively through thoughtful allocation of clinical resources.
BACKGROUND: Many individuals who die by suicide present for nonbehavioral health care prior to death. The risk is often undetected. Universal suicide screening in health care may improve risk recognition. A quality improvement project involving a universal suicide screening program was designed and developed in a large safety-net health care system. METHODS: The steps in developing and implementing this quality improvement program were gathering intelligence, examining resources, designing the screening program, creating a clinical response, constructing an electronic health record screening protocol, clinical workforce education, and program implementation. This project used the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Clinical Practice Screener-Recent, and a preliminary clinical decision support system. RESULTS: Prevalence data on suicide risk levels are provided for 328,064 adult encounters from the first six months of the screening program. Approximately half of the screens were completed in the outpatient clinics, more than 40% in the emergency department (ED), and slightly less than 5% in the hospital inpatient units. In the ED, 6.3% of the screens were positive, as were 1.6% in the inpatient units, and 2.1% in the outpatient clinics. The odds of a positive suicide screening in the ED was 4.29 times higher than the inpatient units and 3.13 times higher than the outpatient clinics. CONCLUSION: A new quality improvement program for universal suicide screening was successfully implemented in a large safety-net health care system. The burden to the system from universal screening was not overwhelming and was managed effectively through thoughtful allocation of clinical resources.
Authors: Emily E Haroz; Christopher Kitchen; Paul S Nestadt; Holly C Wilcox; Jordan E DeVylder; Hadi Kharrazi Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Khyati Brahmbhatt; Brian P Kurtz; Khalid I Afzal; Lisa L Giles; Elizabeth D Kowal; Kyle P Johnson; Elizabeth Lanzillo; Maryland Pao; Sigita Plioplys; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Brent R Crandal; Laika D Aguinaldo; Chelsea Carter; Glenn F Billman; Kendall Sanderson; Cynthia Kuelbs Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jamie Kammer; Mahfuza Rahman; Molly Finnerty; Deborah Layman; Katrina Vega; Hanga Galfalvy; Christa Labouliere; Gregory K Brown; Kelly Green; Anni Cummings; Prabu Vasan; Barbara Stanley Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Paige E Cervantes; Dana E M Seag; Argelinda Baroni; Ruth Gerson; Katrina Knapp; Ee Tein Tay; Ethan Wiener; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 3.084