Literature DB >> 29290134

Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.

David S Xu1, Konrad Bach2, Juan S Uribe1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive anterior and lateral approaches to the lumbar spine are increasingly used to treat and reduce grade I spondylolisthesis, but concerns still exist for their usage in the management of higher-grade lesions. The authors report their experience with this strategy for grade II spondylolisthesis in a single-surgeon case series and provide early clinical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of a single surgeon's cases between 2012 and 2016 identified all patients with a Meyerding grade II lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) targeting the slipped level. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected and analyzed. Changes in radiographic measurements, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared using the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous and ordinal variables, respectively. RESULTS The average operative time was 199.1 minutes (with 60.6 ml of estimated blood loss) for LLIFs and 282.1 minutes (with 106.3 ml of estimated blood loss), for ALIFs. Three LLIF patients had transient unilateral anterior thigh numbness during the 1st week after surgery, and 1 ALIF patient had transient dorsiflexion weakness, which was resolved at postoperative week 1. The mean follow-up time was 17.6 months (SD 12.5 months) for LLIF patients and 10 months (SD 3.1 months) for ALIF patients. Complete reduction of the spondylolisthesis was achieved in 12 LLIF patients (75.0%) and 7 ALIF patients (87.5%). Across both procedures, there was an increase in both the segmental lordosis (LLIF 5.6°, p = 0.002; ALIF 15.0°, p = 0.002) and overall lumbar lordosis (LLIF 2.9°, p = 0.151; ALIF 5.1°, p = 0.006) after surgery. Statistically significant decreases in the mean VAS and the mean ODI measurements were seen in both treatment groups. The VAS and ODI scores fell by a mean value of 3.9 (p = 0.002) and 19.8 (p = 0.001), respectively, for LLIF patients and 3.8 (p = 0.02) and 21.0 (p = 0.03), respectively, for ALIF patients at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Early clinical and radiographic results from using minimally invasive LLIF and ALIF approaches to treat grade II spondylolisthesis appear to be good, with low operative blood loss and no neurological deficits. Complete reduction of the spondylolisthesis is frequently possible with a statistically significant reduction in pain scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF; ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; LIF; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; MIS; MIS = minimally invasive; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PEEK = polyetheretherketone; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; VAS = visual analog scale (for pain); XLIF; spondylolisthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29290134     DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  9 in total

1.  Retrospective radiographic analysis of anterior lumbar fusion for high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Maziyar A Kalani; Pelagia Kouloumberis; Alexandra E Richards; Mark K Lyons; Victor J Davila; Matthew T Neal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Management of symptomatic degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Nick Evans; Michael McCarthy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

3.  Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5.

Authors:  Myeong Jin Ko; Seung Won Park; Young Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-05-08

4.  Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Min Li; Ren-Jie Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Does the Position of Cage Affect the Clinical Outcome of Lateral Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?

Authors:  Guangxi Qiao; Min Feng; Jian Liu; Xiaodong Wang; Miao Ge; Bin Yang; Bin Yue
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-28

6.  Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases.

Authors:  Jiaqi Li; Yapeng Sun; Lei Guo; Fei Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Jayme Koltsov; Tianyi Wang; Grace Xiong; Karthik Nathan; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  [Early effectiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  Biao Hu; Ling Yu; Quanming Liao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15

9.  Evaluation of lumbar fusion using the anterior to psoas approach for the treatment of L5/S1 spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Wei He; Da He; Wei Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.