Literature DB >> 29290128

Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.

Peter G Campbell1, Pierce D Nunley2, David Cavanaugh1, Eubulus Kerr2, Philip Andrew Utter1, Kelly Frank3, Marcus Stone3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Recently, authors have called into question the utility and complication index of the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure at the L4-5 level. Furthermore, the need for direct decompression has also been debated. Here, the authors report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion, relying only on indirect decompression to treat patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to Grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective evaluation of 18 consecutive patients with Grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis from a prospectively maintained database. All patients underwent a transpsoas approach, followed by posterior percutaneous instrumentation without decompression. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-12 were administered during the clinical evaluations. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. The mean follow-up was 6.2 months. RESULTS Fifteen patients with Grade 1 and 3 patients with Grade 2 spondylolisthesis were identified and underwent fusion at a total of 20 levels. The mean operative time was 165 minutes for the combined anterior and posterior phases of the operation. The estimated blood loss was 113 ml. The most common cage width in the anteroposterior dimension was 22 mm (78%). Anterior thigh dysesthesia was identified on detailed sensory evaluation in 6 of 18 patients (33%); all patients experienced resolution within 6 months postoperatively. No patient had lasting sensory loss or motor deficit. The average ODI score improved 26 points by the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, the SF-12 mean Physical and Mental Component Summary scores improved by 11.9% and 9.6%, respectively. No patient required additional decompression postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study offers clinical results to establish lateral lumbar interbody fusion as an effective technique for the treatment of Grade 1 or 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The use of this surgical approach provides a minimally invasive solution that offers excellent arthrodesis rates as well as favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of postoperative complications. However, adhering to the techniques of transpsoas lateral surgery, such as minimal table break, an initial look-and-see approach to the psoas, clear identification of the plexus, minimal cranial caudal expansion of the retractor, mobilization of any traversing sensory nerves, and total psoas dilation times less than 20 minutes, ensures the lowest possible complication profile for both visceral and neural injuries even in the narrow safe zones when accessing the L4-5 disc space in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DLIF; DS = degenerative spondylolisthesis; LLIF; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; MCS = Mental Component Summary; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = Physical Component Summary; XLIF; direct lateral interbody fusion; extreme lateral interbody fusion; lateral fusion; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; spondylolisthesis; transpsoas

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29290128     DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  17 in total

1.  Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Thomas S Brundage; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Jeffrey Podnar; Asokumar Buvanendran; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their chondroprogenitor derivatives reduced pain and inflammation signaling and promote regeneration in a rat intervertebral disc degeneration model.

Authors:  Sobia Ekram; Shumaila Khalid; Imtiaz Bashir; Asmat Salim; Irfan Khan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Joseph Ferguson; Kyle N Kunze; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5.

Authors:  Myeong Jin Ko; Seung Won Park; Young Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-05-08

6.  Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Min Li; Ren-Jie Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Jayme Koltsov; Tianyi Wang; Grace Xiong; Karthik Nathan; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  [Early effectiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  Biao Hu; Ling Yu; Quanming Liao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15

9.  Comparison of outcomes between indirect decompression of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and MIS-TLIF in one single-level lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  Shih-Feng Hung; Jen-Chung Liao; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Yun-Da Li; Ping-Yeh Chiu; Ming-Kai Hsieh; Fu-Cheng Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Michael Chioffe; Michael McCarthy; Peter R Swiatek; Joseph P Maslak; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Muturi Muriuki; Avinash Patwardhan; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.