Literature DB >> 29289794

Unsupervised learning of complex associations in an animal model.

Leyre Castro1, Edward A Wasserman2, Marisol Lauffer2.   

Abstract

Supervised learning results from explicit corrective feedback, whereas unsupervised learning results from statistical co-occurrence. In an initial training phase, we gave pigeons an unsupervised learning task to see if mere pairing could establish associations between multiple pairs of visual images. To assess learning, we administered occasional testing trials in which pigeons were shown an object and had to choose between previously paired and unpaired tokens. Learning was evidenced by preferential choice of the previously unpaired token. In a subsequent supervised training phase, learning was facilitated if the object and token had previously been paired. These results document unsupervised learning in pigeons and resemble statistical learning in infants, suggesting an important parallel between human and animal cognition.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Novelty preference; Statistical learning; Supervised learning; Unsupervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29289794      PMCID: PMC5801203          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  21 in total

1.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: a versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Edward A Wasserman; Lloyd Frei; Keith Miller
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-05

3.  Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 5.  What's elementary about associative learning?

Authors:  E A Wasserman; R R Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 6.  Trends in extreme learning machines: a review.

Authors:  Gao Huang; Guang-Bin Huang; Shiji Song; Keyou You
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2014-10-16

7.  Using Habituation of Looking Time to Assess Mental Processes in Infancy.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2010-07-01

8.  Strategy development and learning differences in supervised and unsupervised categorization.

Authors:  Erin Colreavy; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

9.  VISUAL EXPERIENCE IN INFANTS: DECREASED ATTENTION TO FAMILIAR PATTERNS RELATIVE TO NOVEL ONES.

Authors:  R L FANTZ
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Friederike Range; Michael Steurer; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Precrastination: The fierce urgency of now.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Ready to Learn: Incidental Exposure Fosters Category Learning.

Authors:  Layla Unger; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.