Literature DB >> 29289758

Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission.

Jia Chen1, Lingyi Yang2, Yi Fan3, Yang Xu1, Yue Han1, Xiaowen Tang1, Huiying Qiu4, Chengcheng Fu4, Miao Miao4, Feng Chen4, Depei Wu5.   

Abstract

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an attractive postremission treatment option for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for some favorable-risk AML patients with additional nongenetic risk factors. Autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and haploidentical donor SCT (haplo-SCT) are the widely used alternatives in cases of a lack of a HLA-matched donor. However, limited data have been published on the direct comparison between these 2 transplant types. Based on the transplant database in our center, we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Patients with extramedullary disease or those achieving CR by more than 2 cycles were excluded. In total, 195 patients were included in the study, 88 of whom underwent auto-SCT and 107 haplo-SCT. In the entire cohort analyses the impact of high relapse incidence in the auto-SCT group was compensated by low nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which resulted in a comparable overall survival (OS) (79.0% ± 4.6% versus 80.1% ± 5.0%, P = .769) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (66.1% ± 5.2% versus 77.4% ± 4.8%, P = .079) compared with those observed in the haplo-SCT group. However, for patients with intermediate-risk AML, NRM was similar between the groups, and haplo-SCT exhibited superior survival. In case of post-SCT relapse, patients with intermediate-risk AML showed markedly inferior 3-year OS compared with that shown by patients with favorable-risk AML (23.3% ± 9.8% versus 60.8% ± 14.3%, P = .011). In the multivariate analyses, minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by flow cytometry and gene mutation status before transplantation were independent predictors for both OS and RFS. We concluded that both auto-SCT and haplo-SCT were acceptable options for postremission treatment of patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML. Haplo-SCT yielded a better outcome in patients with intermediate-risk AML, but the relapse after SCT still led to a poor outcome. Clearance of MRD before SCT could improve the prognosis after transplantation.
Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Autologous stem cell transplantation; Complete remission; Haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29289758     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  5 in total

1.  Features of Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Acute Leukemia Patients After Haplo-HCT With Myeloablative ATG-Containing Conditioning Regimen.

Authors:  Yuhua Ru; Jinjin Zhu; Tiemei Song; Yiyang Ding; Ziling Zhu; Yi Fan; Yang Xu; Aining Sun; Huiying Qiu; Zhengming Jin; Xiaowen Tang; Yue Han; Chengcheng Fu; Suning Chen; Xiao Ma; Feng Chen; Jia Chen; Depei Wu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.073

2.  Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the prevalence and impacts on outcomes : EBV and CMV reactivation post allo-HCT in NHL.

Authors:  Yiyang Ding; Yuhua Ru; Tiemei Song; Lingchuan Guo; Xiang Zhang; Jinjin Zhu; Caixia Li; Zhengming Jin; Haiwen Huang; Yuqing Tu; Mimi Xu; Yang Xu; Jia Chen; Depei Wu
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: multifactorial impact on transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Yuhua Ru; Xiang Zhang; Tiemei Song; Yiyang Ding; Ziling Zhu; Yi Fan; Yang Xu; Aining Sun; Huiying Qiu; Zhengming Jin; Xiaowen Tang; Yue Han; Zhengzheng Fu; Suning Chen; Xiao Ma; Feng Chen; Jia Chen; Depei Wu
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Association Between Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and First Remission, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Sijian Yu; Zhiping Fan; Liping Ma; Yu Wang; Fen Huang; Qing Zhang; Jiafu Huang; Shunqing Wang; Na Xu; Li Xuan; Mujun Xiong; Lijie Han; Zhiqiang Sun; Hongyu Zhang; Hui Liu; Guopan Yu; Pengcheng Shi; Jun Xu; Meiqing Wu; Ziwen Guo; Yiying Xiong; Chongyang Duan; Jing Sun; Qifa Liu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 5.  Optimizing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia.

Authors:  Aiming Pang; Yingying Huo; Biao Shen; Yawei Zheng; Erlie Jiang; Sizhou Feng; Mingzhe Han
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 6.940

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.