Why don't key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG).
METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design. We used the national surveillance survey data of 2012, which included 610 FSWs and 400 MSM/TG recruited randomly from 22 and three districts of Nepal, respectively. Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using modified Poisson regression was used to assess and infer the association between outcome (non-utilisation of HTC in last year) and independent variables.
RESULTS: Non-utilisation of HTC in the last year was 54% for FSWs and 55% for MSM/TG. The significant factors for non-utilisation of HTC among FSWs were depression (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)), injectable drug abuse (ever) (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) and absence of dependents in the family (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). Non-utilisation of HTC among MSM/TG had significant association with age 16-19 years (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7)), non-condom use (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0)), physical assault in previous year (aPR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)).
CONCLUSION: Although limited by cross-sectional design, we found many programmatically relevant findings. Creative strategies should be envisaged for effective behavioural change communication to improve access to HIV testing. Psychosocial and structural interventions should be integrated with HIV prevention programmes to support key populations in accessing HIV testing. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Psychosocial and structural factors were assessed for the first time in the national surveillance survey of 2012.

Social desirability bias and recall bias due to the assessment of past exposures might have influenced the self-reported variables.

The cross-sectional design of the study limits conclusion on causality.

Introduction

Globally, at the end of 2015, an estimated 36.7 million people were living with HIV, of which 47% did not know their HIV status and hence were deprived of antiretroviral therapy and care.1 According to UNAIDS 90-90-90 target, by 2020, 90% of all individuals living with HIV should know their HIV status, 90% of all individuals with diagnosed HIV infection should receive sustained antiretroviral therapy, and 90% of all individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy should have viral suppression. By 2030 the AIDS epidemic will no longer be a public health threat if these three targets are achieved.2

The key population are those who have a high risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV. Global studies have shown that key populations are 13–22 times more likely to be infected with HIV than the general population.3 The key population includes female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men (MSM)/transgender (TG).4 FSWs and MSM/TG are 13–14 times more likely to be infected with HIV than the general population.3

WHO recommended an integrated biological and behavioural surveillance (IBBS) survey to monitor HIV prevalence and risk behaviours among key populations. In the late 1990s, IBBS was started by the government of Nepal as part of a response plan against an HIV/AIDS epidemic.5 HIV testing and counselling (HTC) is the entry point for HIV care services in Nepal and is provided free of cost to all. HTC is a critical intervention in achieving the first 90, that is, people living with HIV should know their HIV status. Though the first step is crucial in identifying people living with HIV (PLHIV), the retention in care of PLHIV in the second 90 and third 90 is equally necessary to maximise the treatment and prevention benefits of antiretroviral therapy.6 7 National consolidated guidelines for preventing and treating HIV in Nepal had recommended various approaches for maximising HIV testing in facility- and community-based settings.4 5 Different surveillance surveys conducted in Nepal found that the non-utilisation of HTC was low, around 50% in FSWs and MSM/TG.8

There was a substantial decline in the proportion of FSWs visiting HTC in 2016 compared with 2012 as revealed by IBBS 2016.9 Among FSWs, a decreasing trend in HIV prevalence was accompanied by an increasing trend in lack of comprehensive knowledge regarding HIV.9 10 The UNAIDS target of 90% assessment of HIV status by 2020 might not be reached in Nepal unless factors associated with non-utilisation of HTC are identified and addressed.2 11 12

Psychosocial variables like distress/depression were included only in the IBBS 2012 survey and were found to be high (40–50%) in the key population studied (people who inject drugs, FSWs and MSM/TG).10 13 14 Different studies demonstrate that the psychosocial problems (depression, drug abuse and suicidality) increase the likelihood of HIV-related risk behaviours among FSWs and MSM/TG in Nepal.15 16 Studies conducted outside of Nepal (India and USA) among key populations (MSM/TG and FSWs) found that psychosocial (depression, substance abuse, violence) and structural factors not only increase their risk behaviours but also lower the uptake of behavioural interventions.17–19 The identification of effects of psychosocial and structural factors in the uptake of HTC would help us to improve existing challenges of reaching key populations in Nepal. However, such evidence is very limited in Nepal. Therefore, using the IBBS 2012 data, we aimed to determine the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural risk factors associated with non-utilisation of HTC in the last year by FSWs and MSM/TG in Nepal.

Methods

Study design

This study was a cross-sectional study involving secondary data of FSWs and MSM/TG collected from the IBBS survey of 2012 in Nepal.

Setting

Nepal, with a population of 27 million, is a low-income, beautiful landlocked country in Southeast Asia.20 It shares borders with China in the north and India to the south, east and west. Nepal is divided into 75 districts and consists of a Himalayan mountainous region in the north and open terrain (Terai in local language) in the south. The HTC service was first started in Nepal in 1995 by the National Programme for AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Disease. There are over 235 HTC service sites in Nepal as of July 2016.

HTC in Nepal

In Nepal, HTC is the entry point for HIV prevention and treatment services, the primary aim of which is to identify people living with HIV and link them to treatment. It is voluntary and provided free of cost. Health facilitators should maintain confidentiality and obtain informed consent during pre-test and post-test counselling. According to national guidelines, key populations are expected to visit HTC every 6–12 months.5 Besides that, community-based interventions are also prioritised in which peer educators and outreach workers are mobilised in the community. Peer educators are volunteers who convey crucial information (proper condom use, HIV testing, etc) to key populations in informal (cruising areas like bus parks or public parks) and formal settings (drop-in centres). They also distribute condoms, safe needles/syringes or make them aware about available treatment, care and support services.

IBBS 2012 survey, Nepal

The National Centre for AIDS and STD Control (NCASC), Nepal conducted two separate cross-sectional IBBS surveys between September and November 2012 for FSWs and MSM/TG, respectively. FSWs were defined as ‘women aged 16 years and above reporting to have been paid in cash or kind for sex with a male within the last 6 months’. MSM/TG were defined as ‘men aged 16 years or above who have had sexual relations (either oral or anal) with another male in the 12 months preceding the survey’.7 A survey among FSWs was conducted in 22 Terai highway districts and for MSM/TG in three districts of Kathmandu valley (Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur)figure 1.

Figure 1

Study districts included in the integrated biological and behavioural surveillance (IBBS) survey 2012, Nepal. FSW – female sex workers; MSM/TG – men who have sex with men/transgender.

Study population and sampling

The FSWs were recruited using two-stage cluster sampling: stage one was the selection of clusters, and stage two was the random selection of an equal number of participants from each selected cluster to ensure a self-weighted sample. A cluster was defined as having at least 30 sex workers in that area; those with fewer than 30 sex workers were merged with nearby locations to form a cluster. To identify clusters, mapping was performed with the support of local non-governmental organisations to determine areas where sex work is common and noting the estimated number of possible survey participants in each area. Seventy clusters out of a total of 401 clusters were selected based on probability proportionate to size (PPS).

The MSM were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (RDS)20 in three districts of Kathmandu valley. To begin with, a total of eight MSM/TG were recruited as seeds. Those seeds were informed about survey protocols and procedures, and were encouraged to randomly recruit other eligible individuals from their social networks to participate in the survey. These initial seeds were provided with three coupons to pass to their peers who were eligible to participate in the survey.

Detailed methodology and sampling strategies for IBBS surveys have been described previously.10 13–15

Data variables for the present study

The IBBS survey included information on behavioural factors like uptake of interventions for HIV, demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural variables.10 13 14 Structural factors included environmental/context conditions which were outside the control of the individual, but which could influence his/her perceptions, behaviour and health.21 Psychosocial variables (social support and depression) were assessed using the Social Support Questionnaire Short form (SSQS) and the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, respectively. The CES-D tool showed high reliability and validity in assessing depression in diverse groups such as PLHIV, women and MSM, with Cronbach’s α≥0.85 and comparative fit indices more than 0.90.22 The CES-D is an extensively normed and validated tool.23 Similarly the reliability and construct validity of the SSQS has been reported as high (>0.90) in different studies.24 25

A median score of <5 in theSSQS scale was interpreted as ‘dissatisfied with available social support’. CES-D scores of 16–21 and ≥22 were classified as distress and depression, respectively. We also assessed suicidality under psychosocial-related variables. Prevalence of demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors is summarised in supplementary web-only tables 1 and 2.

A self-reported visit to an HTC facility in the past year by FSWs and MSM/TG was chosen as the outcome variable. The outcome variable was assessed by asking ‘Have you visited (yes vs no) any HTC centres in the last 12 months?’ (Reasons for visiting: pre–post HIV/AIDS test counselling, information on HIV/AIDS window period, HIV test result, counselling on using condom correctly in each sexual intercourse). In addition to reasons above, discussion on safe injecting behaviour was also one of the self-reported reasons among people who inject drugs (PWID) for visiting HTC. The independent variables (demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural risk variables) selected in this study have been described in online supplementary web-only box 1.

Analysis and statistics

Data analysis was done separately for FSWs and MSM/TG. Data were analysed using STATA (version 12.1, STATA Corp., College Station, Teas, USA). Categorical variables were described using frequency and proportions. The unadjusted and adjusted analysis was performed separately for FSWs and MSM/TG to assess the association of factors with the outcome variable (not utilising HTC in last  year). All the RDS-related descriptive outputs were adjusted to represent the structure of the study population (MSM/TG), which was based on information regarding who recruited whom, and the relative size of the respondent’s network using the Volz–Heckathorn estimator (RDS II).(20) To assess the network size among MSM/TG, the following question was asked: ’How many other MSM/TG do you know who also know you well? (Knowing someone is defined as being able to contact them and having had contact with them in the past 12 months)'. RDS-adjusted values are presented in the supplementary material (supplementary web-only tables 1 and 2). A convergence plot for outcome variables is also shown in the supplementary material (supplementary file web only figure 1). Adjustment for clustering of two-stage cluster sampling was not required for FSW data as it was a self-weighted sample.

Bivariate associations between each independent variable and non-utilisation of HTC were calculated using a variance inflation factor after assessment for multicollinearity. Variables with a p value <0.2 in the bivariate analysis were included in the regression model (enter method). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by fitting a Poisson regression with robust variance estimates. The variables included in the multivariate model (aPR) for FSWs were age group, educational status, condom use at last sex, ever inject drugs, ever participated in HIV awareness programme, physical assault in last year, forced sex in last year, having dependents, police detention in last 6 months, stigma towards HIV and distress/depression. The variables included in the aPR for MSM/TG were age group, condom use at last sex, drinking alcohol, ever participated in HIV awareness programme, physical assault in last year, forced sex in last year, and discrimination in job and suicidal thought ‘ever’.

Initially, we used the log-binomial model to assess the association between independent and outcome variables of interest. However, the log-binomial model failed to converge. To overcome the effects of failed convergence, we used Poisson regression with robust variance estimates as recommended by Tyler et al.26 Poisson regression with robust variance can be used as an alternative to logistic regression and also provides accurate estimates in the cross-sectional study with a binary outcome of interest.27 We calculated the prevalence ratio because it was easier to interpret than the odds ratio. We also assessed associations between outcome and independent variables via the Poisson model using individualised RDS weights (online supplementary web-only table 3).

Ethical considerations

Ethics approval for the IBBS survey 2012 was given by the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), Kathmandu, Nepal. Approval for the analysis of secondary data for this study was obtained in 2016 from the Ethics Advisory Group, the International UnionAgainst Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France. Administrative approval was also received from NCASC and Public Health and Environment Research Centre (PERC) Nepal. Waiver of informed consent was sought and approved by the ethics committee as this study involved analysis of secondary data.

Results

The IBBS survey 2012 included 610 FSWs with a response rate of 88.9%. The non-responders were replaced by other randomly selected FSWs of the same cluster. The HIV prevalence was 1% among FSWs. The proportion of FSWs in the age group 16–19 was 13.9%. The prevalence of non-utilisation of HTC in last year was 54% among FSWs. More than half of FSWs (59%) were married, 24% of them were divorced or separated. Two-thirds of FSWs (68%) were literate (table 1 and online supplementary web-only table 2).

Table 1

Factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) centres among female sex workers surveyed under the integrated biological and behavioural surveillance survey, 2012, Nepal

Variables	Total	HTC not utilised†	Adj. PR‡
	N	n (%)
Total	610	330 (54)
Demographic
Age in years
16–19	85	51 (60)	1.0 (0.8 to 1.2)
20–24	130	73 (56)	1.0 (0.7 to 1.2)
>25	395	206 (52)	Ref.
Educational status
Illiterate	196	98 (50)	0.9 (0.7 to 1.0)
Literate	414	232 (56)	Ref.
Marital status
Married	360	197 (55)	Ref.
Unmarried	102	60 (59)	–
Separated/divorced	148	73 (49)	–
Having dependents
Yes	341	169 (50)	Ref.
No	269	161 (60)	1.1 (1.0 to 1.3)*
Behavioural
Condom use at last sex
Yes	461	256 (56)	Ref.
No	149	74 (32)	0.9 (0.7 to 1.0)
Ever inject drugs
Yes	40	29 (73)	1.4 (1.1 to 1.8)*
No	570	301 (53)	Ref.
Structural
Ever participated in HIV awareness programme
Yes	169	102 (52)	1.2 (1.0 to 1.4)*
No	441	228 (60)	Ref.
Physical assault in last year
Yes	81	36 (44)	0.8 (0.6 to 1.0)
No	529	294 (56)	Ref.
Housing instability
Homeless	15	6 (40)	–
Own home	320	169 (53)	–
Rented	275	155 (56)
Forced sex in last year
Yes	125	84 (67)	1.1 (1.0 to 1.3)*
No	485	246 (51)	Ref.
Police detention in last 6 months
Yes	81	37 (46)	0.8 (0.6 to 1.0)
No	529	293 (55)	Ref.
Client refusal to pay in last year
Yes	153	89 (58)	–
No	457	241 (53)	–
Psychosocial
Stigma towards HIV
Yes	295	168 (57)	1.0 (0.9 to 1.2)
No	315	162 (51)	Ref.
Suicidal thoughts (ever)
Yes	210	117 (56)	–
No	399	212 (53)	–
Depression§
Euthymic	342	159 (46)	Ref.
Distressed	156	100 (64)	1.4 (1.1 to 1.5)*
Depressed	112	71 (63)	1.4 (1.1 to 1.6)*
SSQS
Satisfied	530	289 (55)	–
Dissatisfied	80	41 (51)	–

*P<0.05.

†Not utilised in last 1 year.

‡Adjusted prevalence ratio (Adj. PR) using Poisson regression with robust variance estimates (enter method); factors with unadjusted PR with P<0.2 included in the model and collinearity checked.

§Depression measured using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale.

Ref., Reference category; SSQS, Social Support Questionnaire Short form.

The IBBS survey 2012 included 400 MSM/TG, and we did not record non-response among MSM/TG because of the nature of the sampling technique; that is, study participants enrol the other possible participants in the study. The HIV prevalence was 3.3% among MSM/TG. The proportion of MSM/TG in the age group 16–19 was 17.2%. Non-utilisation of HTC in last  year was 55% for MSM/TG. The majority of MSM/TG were unmarried (72%) whereas very few of them were illiterate (3%). Other characteristics of the FSWs and MSM/TG are presented in online supplementary web-only tables 1 and 2.

The factors associated with non-utilisation of HTC in last year among FSWs and MSM/TG are summarised in table 1 and table 2, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, the association between non-utilisation of HTC and distress/depression remained significant. FSWs experiencing distress (aPR 1.4; 95% C 1.1 to 1.5) and depression (aPR 1.4; 95% C 1.1 to 1.6) were more likely not to use HTC in the past year. Similarly, FSWs who were injecting drugs (ever) (aPR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.8), ever participated in HIV awareness programmes (aPR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), or had no dependents in the family (aPR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) were more likely not to use HTC. FSWs who experienced forced sex (aPR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) in the last 12 months were also more likely not to use HTC (table 1).

Table 2

Factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) centres among men having sex with men/transgender surveyed under the integrated biological and behavioural surveillance survey, 2012, Nepal

Variables	N	HTC not utilised†	Adj. PR‡
		n (%)§
Total	400	221 (55)
Demographic factors
Age in years
16–19	69	54 (78)	1.4 (1.1 to 1.7)*
20–24	129	73 (57)	1.1 (0.9 to 1.4)
>25	202	94 (47)	Ref.
Educational status
Illiterate	13	7 (54)	–
Literate	387	214 (55)	–
Marital status
Unmarried	289	163 (56)	–
Married	111	58 (52)	–
Behavioural
Condom use at last sex
Yes	339	177 (72)	Ref.
No	61	44 (52)	1.2 (1.0 to 1.4)*
Drinking alcohol
Yes	323	186 (58)	1.2 (0.9 to 1.5)
No	77	35 (45)	Ref.
Structural
Ever participated in HIV awareness programme
Yes	185	62 (34)	1.6 (1.3 to 2.0)*
No	215	159 (74)	Ref.
Physical assault in last year
Yes	57	10 (18)	1.8 (1.0 to 3.1)*
No	343	211 (62)	Ref.
Housing instability
Homeless	8	4 (50)	–
Own home	75	42 (56)	–
Rented	317	175 (55)	–
Forced sex in last year
Yes	52	10 (19)	0.5 (0.3 to 0.9)*
No	348	211 (61)	Ref.
Discrimination in job
Yes	79	17 (22)	Ref.
No	321	204 (64)	1.3 (0.8 to 2.2)
Psychosocial factors
Stigma towards HIV
Yes	253	138 (54)	–
No	147	83 (56)	–
Suicidal thought ever
Yes	107	33 (31)	0.7 (0.5 to 1.0)
No	293	188(64)	Ref.
Depression¶
Euthymic	220	121 (59)	–
Distressed	83	49 (53)	–
Depressed	97	51 (55)	–
SSQS
Satisfied	390	216 (55)	–
Dissatisfied	10	5 (50)	–

*P<0.05.

†Not utilised in last 1 year.

‡Adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) using Poisson regression with robust variance estimates (enter method); factors with unadjusted PR with P<0.2 included in model and collinearity checked.

§Unweighted descriptive statistics for RDS-weighted estimates, refer to online supplementary web-only table 3

¶Depression measured using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale.

RDS, respondent-driven sampling; SSQS, Social Support Questionnaire Short form.

MSM/TG who were adolescents aged 16–19 years (aPR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) and experienced physical assault (aPR 1.8; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.1) were more likely not to use HTC. However, MSM/TG who experienced forced sex (aPR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.9) were less likely not to use HTC. MSM/TG who did not use a condom during their last sex (aPR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4) or participated in an HIV awareness programme (aPR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) were more likely not to use HTC (table 2).

We also assessed the association between independent variables and outcome variable via a Poisson model using individualised RDS weights. However, not much variation was observed in the results of the weighted and unweighted analysis (online supplementary web-only table 3).

Discussion

In the IBBS 2012 survey, in addition to individual-level variables, psychosocial and structural factors were added. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the relation between psychosocial and structural factors with HTC non-utilisation among FSWs and MSM/TG in Nepal. The uptake of HTC was low (around 55%) among MSM/TG in Nepal, which is consistent with the findings of studies conducted in Assam and Andra Pradesh, India; Zhejiang province, China; and Bangkok, Thailand.28–31Our study also demonstrates a low level of uptake of HTC among key population in Nepal, which is even lower (33%) among key population of Manipur and Nagaland in India.32 The current scenario suggests that the low uptake of HTC among MSM/TG and FSWs not only challenges timely identification and referring them for treatment to improve their health, but also increases the risk of secondary transmission from HIV-infected MSM/TG and FSWs to their partners. Community-based HTC with different approaches (mobile testing and door-to-door testing, etc) that was found to be effective in increasing uptake of HTC and linking people to HIV care among MSM/TG and FSWs in other settings33 needs to be evaluated in the context of Nepal. Otherwise, the 90-90-90 targets prioritised to improve health and prevention of secondary HIV transmission will not be possible in Nepal. This study also found different risk factors for non-utilisation of HTC in the last year among FSWs and MSM/TG. They were demographic: late adolescents (MSM/TG), absence of dependent members (FSWs); behavioural: injectable drug abuse (FSWs) and no condom use at last sex (MSM/TG); structural: participation in HIV awareness programmes (FSWs and MSM/TG), forced sex in last year (risk factor among FSWs and protective factor among MSM/TG), physical assault in last year (MSM/TG); and psychosocial: being distressed/depressed (FSWs).

Psychosocial factors play an important role in health services utilisation.16 FSWs who were distressed or had depression (4 out of every 10) had a higher prevalence of non-utilisation of HTC. This could have resulted in disempowerment and resulted in not accessing HTC services when needed.13 14 Studies have found that FSWs used alcohol and drugs to reduce stress and to help them cope with their work.17 34 A Gambian study showed that women who experienced forced sex reported severe depression.35 A study conducted among FSWs working outside of the capital city (Kathmandu) found a very high prevalence of depression, and the experience of any form of violence (verbal, physical or sexual) was also common and associated with depression.36 Currently, there are no targeted programmes to address the mental health problems of FSWs in Nepal and the lack of laws that protect the rights of sex workers also exacerbates the experience of violence among them. Efforts to address violence and its consequences (depression) among FSWs are essential in Nepal otherwise it will be difficult to increase uptake of HTC among them.

According to the IBBS survey of 2012, older MSM/TG were found to use condoms more often compared with younger MSM/TG. Similarly, the median age of first sexual intercourse being 16 years and the fact that older adolescent MSM/TG (16–19 years) did not significantly access HTC are causes of concern.10 13 The risk-taking behaviour in adolescents can compound their risk of acquiring HIV, and therefore this group needs to be targeted. In Nepal, the blanket approach to implementing interventions (HTC) without considering the specific needs of adolescents or young people belonging to key populations might have an impact on the low uptake of HTC. Evidence from China suggests that the use of a peer-led community-based rapid HIV test increases the uptake of HIV testing among young MSM.37

Not visiting an HTC facility was also associated with not using a condom during last sex among MSM/TG. FSWs who were injecting drugs were also less likely to use HTC in the last 12 months. Our study findings are consistent with the study conducted among FSWs in Vietnam where unprotected sex and injecting drug use were associated with a lower likelihood of having a voluntary HIV test.38 The findings suggest that we are failing to reach those FSWs who are at increased risk of HIV due to their dual risky behaviours, such as unprotected sex or injecting drugs.

Some factors affecting utilisation of HTC by MSM/TG were different from those of FSWs. Events like forced sex in the last year among FSW reduced the utilisation of HTC among FSWs. Among MSM/TG, the experience of forced sex led to the utilisation of HTC. The difference might be due to the fact that MSM/TG are a more highly networked population than FSWs39; most of them are directly or indirectly associated with their community organisations (Blue Diamond Society), which work for the rights of gender and sexuality minorities in Nepal. That may have resulted in MSM/TG seeking available services after experiencing sexual abuse.

Participation in HIV awareness programmes by key populations has shown a decreasing trend over the years.10 13 Participation as a risk factor for non-utilisation of HTC for both FSWs and MSM/TG is intriguing. The activities which enlisted more participation were short duration events like condom/AIDS day celebration compared with effective training methods like demonstration classes, workshops, and so on (online supplementary web only table 2). These aforementioned short-term awareness activities might not affect the knowledge levels of FSWs and MSM/TG about the importance of HTC. The other explanation for this could be the cross-sectional nature of the data. Those who had visited HTC in the last year might not have felt the need for attending HIV awareness programmes.

Despite being limited by a cross-sectional design, the findings of this study bring out three significant policy implications. First, the intervention to address the burden of depression needs to be an integral part of programmes for FSWs and MSM/TG at all levels. Second, HTC should be developed as an empowerment centre or training to improve the skills that help FSWs and MSM/TG to tackle physical and sexual abuse. Third, specific prevention programmes should be rolled out to reach adolescent FSWs and MSM/TG, and FSWs who are practising dual risk behaviours such as inconsistent condom use or injecting drug use. The HTC centre should also consider the specific needs of adolescent FSWs or MSM/TG.

Our study adhered to STROBE guidelines for conduct and reporting of the study.40 The findings are generalisable to FSWs and MSM/TG of Nepal as a standard sampling strategy was followed for the IBBS survey.10 13–15 The present study had inherent limitations of analysing secondary data. Certain pertinent variables (for example, injectable drug abuse in the last 12 months among MSM/TG) could not be included in the analysis due to missing data. The limitations of the original survey like social desirability bias and recall bias due to the assessment of past exposures might have influenced the self-reported variables. The cross-sectional design may result in difficulties in ascertaining temporality between various factors studied and non-utilisation of HTC.

Conclusion

To conclude, psychosocial and structural factors are influencing the utilisation of HIV testing and counselling centres among FSWs and MSM/TG in Nepal. In addition to focusing on these risk factors, there is a need to improve HTC to provide psychosocial support or to address the needs of specific adolescent FSWs and MSM/TG or FSWs who also inject drugs. Creative behaviour change and communication strategies or interventions to improve the skills to tackle physical and sexual abuse should be implemented to overcome the limitations of current programmes for key populations in Nepal.