Literature DB >> 29287875

Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy.

Chris Mularczyk1, David L Walner2, Katherine K Hamming3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast coblation and microdebrider with touch-up electrocautery (ME) for adenoidectomy in children.
METHODS: Patients <18 years old undergoing adenoidectomy without tonsillectomy were selected for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Participants were enrolled into one of two groups based on birth date: coblation or ME. The surgeons completed a standard survey about intraoperative factors for each method. Recovery nurses filled out a standardized survey postoperatively. A third standardized survey was completed via a phone interview with the parent or patient caregiver on postoperative day 3 to assess procedure outcomes. The survey results were then compared using ANOVA statistical analysis.
RESULTS: 50 patients were enrolled in the coblation group and 51 were enrolled in the ME group. There was no significant difference in mean age between the coblation (4.96 years) and ME groups (4.58 years) (p = 0.525). The mean time (in minutes) for coblation (5.50) was significantly lower than ME (9.47) when controlling for the confounder: surgical site exposure (p < 0.001). The surgical time was significantly influenced by the quality of exposure/visualization (p = 0.037). The coblator method had significantly less intraoperative blood loss compared to ME (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between coblation (1.53) and ME (2.05) for days of pain (p = 0.045) when controlling for the confounder adenoid size.
CONCLUSION: In our study we found that coblation demonstrated significantly less intraoperative time and less blood loss, as well as a shorter duration of postoperative pain, when compared to ME for adenoidectomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coblation; Instruments; Microdebrider; Nasopharynx; Pediatric adenoidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29287875     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  2 in total

1.  Use of Radiofrequency Technology in Endonasal Skull Base and Transcranial Procedures.

Authors:  Shahed Tish; Ghaith Habboub; Hamid Borghei-Razavi; Troy D Woodard; Raj Sindwani; Varun R Kshettry; Pablo F Recinos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-09

2.  Intrapatient Comparison of Coblation versus Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kyu Young Choi; Jae-Cheul Ahn; Chae-Seo Rhee; Doo Hee Han
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.